g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | |
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 2 rutgers啊
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: if Maryland join BIG
|
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 3 thought Rutgers and GT are in the mix
Did they vote already?
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: rutgers啊
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 4 GT? i don't think so. Rutgers' invitation is conditional on Maryland accepta
nce i think so it won't be today
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: thought Rutgers and GT are in the mix
: Did they vote already?
|
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 5 why maryland? just for DC market?
accepta
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: GT? i don't think so. Rutgers' invitation is conditional on Maryland accepta
: nce i think so it won't be today
|
j***4
发帖数: 3119 | 6 Maryland board of regents already voted in favor of the move.
http://www.freep.com/article/20121119/SPORTS08/121119023/maryla |
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 7 i'm really underwhelmed by these moves. rutgers and maryland do reside in bi
g markets but these markets are dominated by pro teams not ncaa teams
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: why maryland? just for DC market?
:
: accepta
|
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 8 agree, why not some team like VT/FSU etc etc
bi
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: i'm really underwhelmed by these moves. rutgers and maryland do reside in bi
: g markets but these markets are dominated by pro teams not ncaa teams
|
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 9 太远了。fsu也不符合"academics"的遮羞布需要
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: agree, why not some team like VT/FSU etc etc
:
: bi
|
c**********o
发帖数: 1941 | 10 VT 还不错
要面子有面子，腰里子有里子
但VT肯定不会走的 |
