i**r
发帖数: 998 | 1 This offense has not won one single game when the opponent has a good
running defense since R2 took over. |
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 2 i kinda sorta agree with you!
we will not have chance until 2013. |
i**r
发帖数: 998 | 3 don't blame the defense.. This offense was way over rated since 3 yrs ago.
they are good at piling high numbers when play bad d-teams or in garbage
time .. |
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 4 我同意，不过我认为关键在OL胖子，我们胖子不行。 |
s*******s
发帖数: 9489 | |
i**r
发帖数: 998 | 6 Passing game sucks ...
DR is good at running against bad D and is not very useful when the opponent
D is fast and disciplined. The defense plan is very simple:
1). Overload the box to stop the run
2). One on one on receivers and take interceptions.
= a lot of 3 and out
= 2 or 3 TOs a game
【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: 我同意，不过我认为关键在OL胖子，我们胖子不行。
|
i**r
发帖数: 998 | 7 I am pandagao
【在 s*******s 的大作中提到】
: 偶很健忘，iper是大素还是微风或者金石头哈？
|
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 8 如果胖子行，RB就随便怎么跑也能搞个3-5yard，传球的时候也不用被穿透。DR时间多
的时候传球还可以，就像对IOWA最后2个drive。IOWA一贯作风，防守在领先后，第四节
就搞cover 2，就靠几个DL pressure QB,DR时间多，传球也好不少。 |
J********l
发帖数: 988 | 9 sadly true. But I think this game is half half. OSU don't have passing game
either. OSU basically is a triple option team. UM can also load the box to
try to stop the opponents and do a better job than Indiana.
The battle will be won/lose based on front 7. Home field advantage is also a
consideration.
Were this game played at a neutral zone, i'd say UM has less than half
chance to win. At big house, I'd take 50/50 and early score is the key to
win.
【在 i**r 的大作中提到】
: This offense has not won one single game when the opponent has a good
: running defense since R2 took over.
|
i**r
发帖数: 998 | 10 DR will not be able to score any early points against OSU's D. There is just
no chance!
Our D is getting much better but we had not been able to shut down Iowa and
MSU's running game either.
game
a
【在 J********l 的大作中提到】
: sadly true. But I think this game is half half. OSU don't have passing game
: either. OSU basically is a triple option team. UM can also load the box to
: try to stop the opponents and do a better job than Indiana.
: The battle will be won/lose based on front 7. Home field advantage is also a
: consideration.
: Were this game played at a neutral zone, i'd say UM has less than half
: chance to win. At big house, I'd take 50/50 and early score is the key to
: win.
|
|
|
l********e
发帖数: 2499 | 11 OSU那个posey最后一场是不是能打？他们QB传球也没那么不堪，说实话我觉得发展1年
很可能比DR要提高得快，而且running threat真不比DR差。 |
d********g
发帖数: 11948 | 12
pandagao不是psu的怎么跑到它密去了？
【在 i**r 的大作中提到】
: I am pandagao
|
J********l
发帖数: 988 | 13 IOWA/MSU both have good QB can provide reasonable threat for secondary.
To play OSU, Michigan need to play good D, particularly gap sound D.
just
and
【在 i**r 的大作中提到】
: DR will not be able to score any early points against OSU's D. There is just
: no chance!
: Our D is getting much better but we had not been able to shut down Iowa and
: MSU's running game either.
:
: game
: a
|
m********t
发帖数: 9426 | 14 你不是海归了吗
【在 i**r 的大作中提到】
: I am pandagao
|
G****e
发帖数: 11198 | 15 There too many can be Ifs if Michigan could play a little better, make fewer
mistakes, cause defensively more turnovers. Offensively, the team is still
not tough enough to win game out easily. Therefore, good luck or bad luck
stands when competing with the hard situations. If there is someone to blame
, it definitely is Al Borges and the offense coaching team. Their coaching
performance is not tough, nor accountable. Their play calls are messy up and
have made the offense ugly to a worse extent. |
