s**********x
发帖数: 4593 | 1 Unbeaten team A beat one top 25 team #9(Coaches Poll)
unbeaten team B beaten #'s 6, 14, 18 and 22
unbeaten team C has beaten number 15
unbeaten team D has beaten #17.
Anyone want to explain why team A has 50 first place votes to team B's
4? |
c********t
发帖数: 2276 | 2 coz team B gets no respect,according to some american fans on the message
board of rivals.
【在 s**********x 的大作中提到】
: Unbeaten team A beat one top 25 team #9(Coaches Poll)
: unbeaten team B beaten #'s 6, 14, 18 and 22
: unbeaten team C has beaten number 15
: unbeaten team D has beaten #17.
: Anyone want to explain why team A has 50 first place votes to team B's
: 4?
|
i***d
发帖数: 1077 | 3 是啊，比不上Bama饭理性，和气，不挖苦别人，不打压,不主动挑衅别的
fans是大家有目共睹的。尤其是你chevrollett更是BAMA饭的模范代表。
怪不得BAMA输球都涨分呢。
【在 c********t 的大作中提到】
: coz team B gets no respect,according to some american fans on the message
: board of rivals.
|
z*****a
发帖数: 3809 | 4 Team A has convincingly beaten all its oppoents, including the BCS #6 team.
Team B has 6 close escapes that could all have easily been losses. Team B
was down or tied in the 4th quarter in 5 games, and barely held on for a 3
point win in another.
【在 s**********x 的大作中提到】
: Unbeaten team A beat one top 25 team #9(Coaches Poll)
: unbeaten team B beaten #'s 6, 14, 18 and 22
: unbeaten team C has beaten number 15
: unbeaten team D has beaten #17.
: Anyone want to explain why team A has 50 first place votes to team B's
: 4?
|
i***d
发帖数: 1077 | 5 1. 这个结果是人工Poll的潜规则，BCS球会同是赢球位置基本不会变的。和对手强弱
怎么赢的没有关系。
2. 竞技体育本来就是看结果的
3. 没看过的比赛少评论，“6 close escapes that could all have easily been
losses.”除了clemson那场确实悬，很有些运气。其他几场都是有惊无险。你倒是说说
你看了那场比赛，觉得是“easily been loss”？还"all"？
【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】
: Team A has convincingly beaten all its oppoents, including the BCS #6 team.
: Team B has 6 close escapes that could all have easily been losses. Team B
: was down or tied in the 4th quarter in 5 games, and barely held on for a 3
: point win in another.
|
s******y
发帖数: 1547 | 6 Just no respect.
If AU wants respect, just win next 3 games. |
c********t
发帖数: 2276 | 7 靠，又不是我说的，人老美球迷的看法和电子计算机的算法都这样，跟我有什么关系
，ft，
【在 i***d 的大作中提到】
: 是啊，比不上Bama饭理性，和气，不挖苦别人，不打压,不主动挑衅别的
: fans是大家有目共睹的。尤其是你chevrollett更是BAMA饭的模范代表。
: 怪不得BAMA输球都涨分呢。
|
i***d
发帖数: 1077 | 8 和respect有什么关系？
就是受人尊敬的BAMA同样情况也过不了Oregon。人工Poll的惯例罢了。
当然”If AU wants respect, just win next 3 games."是对的。
Auburn比不了BAMA输了两场还是那么受人最终。差距太大了。
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: Just no respect.
: If AU wants respect, just win next 3 games.
|
c********t
发帖数: 2276 | 9 谁叫你们都主动，准时，热情地第一时间跳出来为我们claim moral victory呢，惭愧阿
【在 i***d 的大作中提到】
: 和respect有什么关系？
: 就是受人尊敬的BAMA同样情况也过不了Oregon。人工Poll的惯例罢了。
: 当然”If AU wants respect, just win next 3 games."是对的。
: Auburn比不了BAMA输了两场还是那么受人最终。差距太大了。
|
p*******e
发帖数: 2310 | 10 You are trying to attack the flaws in ranking system, by using the wins
against "ranked" teams. Think twice before you post.
SEC is a very good conference. But take time to look at their schedules.
Their teams home game to away game ratio is close to 2:1. In college games,
you know how home game is important and sometimes blindly biased to hosting
team because of officiating. For example, Auburn has 8 home games, and their
quality wins, like against LSU, Arkansas, S. Carolina are all from home. If
you don't believe me, look at those key matchups in SEC. Most of them
ending with host team wins. Same happening in other conferences. But SEC
take advantage of scheduling home games against OOC components so that they
have more wins to boost their overall conference rankings.
Anyway, I can't see Auburn win at Alabama. Another key matchup that will
favor the home team. Hope auburn don't get destroyed by the Tide. |
|
|
i***d
发帖数: 1077 | 11 正常来说主场确实有优势。不过铁碗已经有点超越主客场优势了。主队球迷的干扰和
羞辱更是客队的优势。这场确实结果难说，但是和主客场关系不大。Auburn在Bama
的主场战绩可是6胜一负。
,
hosting
their
If
they
【在 p*******e 的大作中提到】
: You are trying to attack the flaws in ranking system, by using the wins
: against "ranked" teams. Think twice before you post.
: SEC is a very good conference. But take time to look at their schedules.
: Their teams home game to away game ratio is close to 2:1. In college games,
: you know how home game is important and sometimes blindly biased to hosting
: team because of officiating. For example, Auburn has 8 home games, and their
: quality wins, like against LSU, Arkansas, S. Carolina are all from home. If
: you don't believe me, look at those key matchups in SEC. Most of them
: ending with host team wins. Same happening in other conferences. But SEC
: take advantage of scheduling home games against OOC components so that they
|
s**********n
发帖数: 1019 | 12 The key is the preseason ranking. Style points are useless in most cases.
Plus, I would prefer Auburn to fly under radar until January.
BCS number 2 is perfect spot right now. But I do think Auburn will take over
#1 from Oregon after Nov. 28. |
n******u
发帖数: 332 | 13 原来这么回事。8主4客。怪不得SEC强，这方面更强啊！
,
hosting
their
If
they
【在 p*******e 的大作中提到】
: You are trying to attack the flaws in ranking system, by using the wins
: against "ranked" teams. Think twice before you post.
: SEC is a very good conference. But take time to look at their schedules.
: Their teams home game to away game ratio is close to 2:1. In college games,
: you know how home game is important and sometimes blindly biased to hosting
: team because of officiating. For example, Auburn has 8 home games, and their
: quality wins, like against LSU, Arkansas, S. Carolina are all from home. If
: you don't believe me, look at those key matchups in SEC. Most of them
: ending with host team wins. Same happening in other conferences. But SEC
: take advantage of scheduling home games against OOC components so that they
|
u***d
发帖数: 851 | 14 别酸了
有本事schedule几个sec的打打
【在 n******u 的大作中提到】
: 原来这么回事。8主4客。怪不得SEC强，这方面更强啊！
:
: ,
: hosting
: their
: If
: they
|
n******u
发帖数: 332 | 15 如果BSU有这么SCHEDULE，不WIN OUT就再不要积极歪歪NCG了。
【在 n******u 的大作中提到】
: 原来这么回事。8主4客。怪不得SEC强，这方面更强啊！
:
: ,
: hosting
: their
: If
: they
|
s**********n
发帖数: 1019 | 16 原来是一BSU黑...
【在 n******u 的大作中提到】
: 如果BSU有这么SCHEDULE，不WIN OUT就再不要积极歪歪NCG了。
|
z*****a
发帖数: 3809 | 17 1. Not true. LSU jumped over Nebraska and Ohio State this week in all three
human polls. Stanford also jumped over Nebraska and Ohio State in the AP.
There are lots of other examples in prior weeks.
2. Yes, and the score is a big part of 结果.
3. If you only win after being behind or tied in the fourth quarter, it's a
close win. The smallest lead Oregon had at any time in the 4th quarter this
year was a 7-point lead against the #6 team in the country (and it was only
that close for the first 5 seconds of the 4th quarter).
【在 i***d 的大作中提到】
: 1. 这个结果是人工Poll的潜规则，BCS球会同是赢球位置基本不会变的。和对手强弱
: 怎么赢的没有关系。
: 2. 竞技体育本来就是看结果的
: 3. 没看过的比赛少评论，“6 close escapes that could all have easily been
: losses.”除了clemson那场确实悬，很有些运气。其他几场都是有惊无险。你倒是说说
: 你看了那场比赛，觉得是“easily been loss”？还"all"？
|
i***d
发帖数: 1077 | 18
three
.
这个我没说清楚，我要说的是全胜的BCS球队之间。你要是找到了跳过的例子那最好。
正好回给那些为小球队鸣冤的。
首先感谢你赞同了我的观点。至于是输赢是"big part of 结果呢"
还是"score is a big part of 结果."还是什么SOS，主客场，球员伤病这类。
大家各持观点吧
a
this
only
我承认都是close game。但你的原文可是“all easily been losses”，这个可是比
close
game强多了。也是你最强的观点。另外劝你不要老把#6 Stanford单列出来。Oregon赢的
剩下的球队的排名还有Auburn赢的球队的排名大家都清楚我就不列了。
最后Auburn的球迷都对现在的排名没什么问题，接受现有系统嘛。倒是TCU/BSU的球迷
很觉得冤的慌。你还是好好和他们解释解释同样的大胜，为什么Oregon能跳过那两个。
那两个的Defence排名可是高很多的哦。
【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】
: 1. Not true. LSU jumped over Nebraska and Ohio State this week in all three
: human polls. Stanford also jumped over Nebraska and Ohio State in the AP.
: There are lots of other examples in prior weeks.
: 2. Yes, and the score is a big part of 结果.
: 3. If you only win after being behind or tied in the fourth quarter, it's a
: close win. The smallest lead Oregon had at any time in the 4th quarter this
: year was a 7-point lead against the #6 team in the country (and it was only
: that close for the first 5 seconds of the 4th quarter).
|
w*****2
发帖数: 1458 | 19 BS. Some SEC teams like to play more home games because of "Money". Those
teams really don't mind to play home-to-home with some big name schools,
such as SC, OU, Ohio State, Penn State, etc. However, what the hell you
think they can play in a packed 90,000 home stadium and trade to play in a
25000 house away instead.
In last 10 years, a SEC team came in Pac-10 territory 5 times and every time
came up as a winner.
,
hosting
their
If
they
【在 p*******e 的大作中提到】
: You are trying to attack the flaws in ranking system, by using the wins
: against "ranked" teams. Think twice before you post.
: SEC is a very good conference. But take time to look at their schedules.
: Their teams home game to away game ratio is close to 2:1. In college games,
: you know how home game is important and sometimes blindly biased to hosting
: team because of officiating. For example, Auburn has 8 home games, and their
: quality wins, like against LSU, Arkansas, S. Carolina are all from home. If
: you don't believe me, look at those key matchups in SEC. Most of them
: ending with host team wins. Same happening in other conferences. But SEC
: take advantage of scheduling home games against OOC components so that they
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 20 吹牛不上税啊。2007 Tenn @ Cal 31-45 这是赢了输了？2005 Arkansas @ USC 17 -
70
time
【在 w*****2 的大作中提到】
: BS. Some SEC teams like to play more home games because of "Money". Those
: teams really don't mind to play home-to-home with some big name schools,
: such as SC, OU, Ohio State, Penn State, etc. However, what the hell you
: think they can play in a packed 90,000 home stadium and trade to play in a
: 25000 house away instead.
: In last 10 years, a SEC team came in Pac-10 territory 5 times and every time
: came up as a winner.
:
: ,
: hosting
|
|
|
n******u
发帖数: 332 | 21 USC beat ARK
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: 吹牛不上税啊。2007 Tenn @ Cal 31-45 这是赢了输了？2005 Arkansas @ USC 17 -
: 70
:
: time
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 22 oh yeah. 2005 usc 70 - arkansas 17
【在 n******u 的大作中提到】
: USC beat ARK
|
j*********e
发帖数: 117 | 23
同意神仙，说这话的人明显只看比分，不看比赛……估计他认为team b赢LSU的比赛很
惊现——因为比分
很接近……
【在 i***d 的大作中提到】
: 1. 这个结果是人工Poll的潜规则，BCS球会同是赢球位置基本不会变的。和对手强弱
: 怎么赢的没有关系。
: 2. 竞技体育本来就是看结果的
: 3. 没看过的比赛少评论，“6 close escapes that could all have easily been
: losses.”除了clemson那场确实悬，很有些运气。其他几场都是有惊无险。你倒是说说
: 你看了那场比赛，觉得是“easily been loss”？还"all"？
|
I**********y
发帖数: 584 | 24 Preseason ranking is a joke. Auburn could not go to NCG in 2004 due to low
preseason ranking. This year, Auburn is in good position now as long as
Auburn wins out.
over
【在 s**********n 的大作中提到】
: The key is the preseason ranking. Style points are useless in most cases.
: Plus, I would prefer Auburn to fly under radar until January.
: BCS number 2 is perfect spot right now. But I do think Auburn will take over
: #1 from Oregon after Nov. 28.
|
H*****r
发帖数: 764 | 25 USC-Auburn 23:0, USC: ARK: 50+ vs 10+, in SEC territory
Auburn was preseason top 10, highest pre-season ranked SEC team that year,
ARK was SEC division champ that year
time
【在 w*****2 的大作中提到】
: BS. Some SEC teams like to play more home games because of "Money". Those
: teams really don't mind to play home-to-home with some big name schools,
: such as SC, OU, Ohio State, Penn State, etc. However, what the hell you
: think they can play in a packed 90,000 home stadium and trade to play in a
: 25000 house away instead.
: In last 10 years, a SEC team came in Pac-10 territory 5 times and every time
: came up as a winner.
:
: ,
: hosting
|
H*****r
发帖数: 764 | 26 Oregon beat Stanford, the best one-loss team,
Oregon beat USC in LA, this crappy USC team can still beat most SEC teams
this year because of their offense
【在 s**********x 的大作中提到】
: Unbeaten team A beat one top 25 team #9(Coaches Poll)
: unbeaten team B beaten #'s 6, 14, 18 and 22
: unbeaten team C has beaten number 15
: unbeaten team D has beaten #17.
: Anyone want to explain why team A has 50 first place votes to team B's
: 4?
|
u***d
发帖数: 851 | 27 lsu is the best one loss team
【在 H*****r 的大作中提到】
: Oregon beat Stanford, the best one-loss team,
: Oregon beat USC in LA, this crappy USC team can still beat most SEC teams
: this year because of their offense
|
H*****r
发帖数: 764 | 28 Stanford is better with a potentail NFL #1 pick QB. LSU has better luck
【在 u***d 的大作中提到】
: lsu is the best one loss team
|
a*****b
发帖数: 1483 | 29 把你们改成他
愧阿
【在 c********t 的大作中提到】
: 谁叫你们都主动，准时，热情地第一时间跳出来为我们claim moral victory呢，惭愧阿
|
n******u
发帖数: 332 | 30 请教一个问题,象WILL222这个贴子,WILL222是随便说说,还是他/她真是人为SEC就是有
这么牛. 反正我人为是偏见.
【在 H*****r 的大作中提到】
: USC-Auburn 23:0, USC: ARK: 50+ vs 10+, in SEC territory
: Auburn was preseason top 10, highest pre-season ranked SEC team that year,
: ARK was SEC division champ that year
:
: time
|
|
|
H*****r
发帖数: 764 | 31 and that crappy UCLA team beat Tenn twice, in both pac-10 and SEC
territories
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: 吹牛不上税啊。2007 Tenn @ Cal 31-45 这是赢了输了？2005 Arkansas @ USC 17 -
: 70
:
: time
|
s**********x
发帖数: 4593 | 32
poor UTK
【在 H*****r 的大作中提到】
: and that crappy UCLA team beat Tenn twice, in both pac-10 and SEC
: territories
|
