b******t
发帖数: 965 | 1 invasion 没啥大不了
维基上有
美国入侵格林纳达
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Grenada
美国入侵阿富汗 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_
Afghanistan
美国入侵巴拿马 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_
Panama
里面还有 美国 自己 找得 legal defense 怎么不违法国际法
The US government invoked self-defense as a legal justification for its
invasion of Panama.[28] Several scholars and observers have opined that the
invasion was illegal under international law. They argue that the
justifications for the invasion which were given by the U.S. were, according
to these sources, factually groundless, and moreover, even if they had been
true they would have provided inadequate support for the invasion under
international law.[55] Article 2 of the United Nations Charter, a
cornerstone of international law, prohibits the use of force by member
states to settle disputes except in self-defense or when authorized by the
United Nations Security Council. Articles 18 and 20 of the Charter of the
Organization of American States, written in part in reaction to the history
of US military interventions in Central America, also explicitly prohibit
the use of force by member states: "[n]o state or group of states has the
right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the
internal affairs of any other state." (Charter of the Organization of
American States (OAS), Article 18.) Article 20 of the OAS Charter states
that "the territory of a states is inviolable; it may not be the object,
even temporarily, of military occupation or of other measures of force taken
by another state, directly or indirectly, on any grounds whatever."[56] The
US has ratified the UN Charter and the OAS Charter and therefore they are
among the highest law of the land in the US under the Supremacy Clause of
the US Constitution. Other international law experts who have examined the
legal justification of the US invasion have concluded that it was a "gross
violation" of international law.[57] |
