W*******n
发帖数: 4140 | 1 Limin Wang
136-09 59th Ave
Flushing, NY 11355
Oct. 1, 2019, Tue
State of New York
Workers’ Compensation Board
PO Box 5205
Binghamton, NY 13902-5205
WCB Case #: G2029240
WC Insurance Carrier Case #: 18D48F512440
Date of Injuries: Jan. 16, 2018
Employer: B.Q. Wide Auto Body Parts Supply, Inc.; KSI Trading Corp; TriNet/
Strategic Outsourcing Inc.
Stated Insurance Carrier: Indemnity Insurance (Co) of North America
Third Party Administrator: Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. (CCMSI)
Re: Rebut the Sept. 19, 2019 IME report of Dr. Robert S. April’s
Dear WCB, WCLJ, CCMSI adjuster Ms. Lisa White,
From the claimant’s party only, I represent myself to have to frankly and
strongly disagree the “objective” findings by Dr. Robert S. April’s “
Independent Medical Examination.”
Dr.RS April’s report attempts to not only justify the denial of Dr. Mehrdad
Golzad’s prescription of “additional balance and vestibular therapy”,
but also to clearly state the rejection of the diagnosis of “cerebral
concussion” (Dr. RSA’s phrase) or of “postconcussion syndrome”, “PCS”,
“traumatic brain injury”, etc, in Dr. M Golzad’s reports. Dr. M Golzad
prescribed “physical & balance therapy” on Aug. 15, 2018, after the
physical therapy was abruptly stopped by another clinic, New York Medical &
Diagnostic Center, in around early May, 2018. Since that abrupt moment to
today, I have not been specifically instructed by any party, any person,
that “physical therapy” has been prescribed by any other physician or has
been authorized by any party. What’s the point of the word “additional”?
because the Aug 06, 2019 prescription by Dr. M Golzad does not include “
physical therapy”, and I have been answered numerous times by Dr. M Golzad
’s office that his office does not treat spine injury and related symptoms.
Later, opposing parties may falsely blame me again without my knowledge for
not going for “authorized” “physical therapy”, since such false
accusation of the “authorized” “physical therapy” upon NYMDC’s request
was exposed from a Jun. 28, 2018 IME report by Dr. Julio V. Westerband. Also
, I believe this IME is just another attempt to delay the so-told-required
authorizations to proper diagnosis like MRI, proper treatment, compensation,
reimbursement, and the pursue of justice.
Beyond these, some expressions in this IME bothered me, such as “There is
no evidence from the data I have reviewed that this claimant suffered
objective loss of consciousness, posttraumatic amnesia, or persistent,
objective problems with balance.”, “In the case of this claimant, the only
significant objective finding reported was a positive Romberg in the tandem
position.” While Dr. RS April attempts to explore other possible causes to
blame, he somehow confirmed some “concussion” symptoms, by stating “
There are many other causes of the subjective symptoms associated with
concussion ------ namely, headache, inability to concentrate, depression,
and subjective dizziness.”
It bothers me. What makes Dr. RS April’s expression/opinion “objective”
and my medical complaints, which were often neglected or changed by other
parties, “subjective”? There had been some tests involved with machines,
which were not easily understood by lay people how they were manipulated. Dr
. John M. Caridi’s review of the April 12, 2018 MRI digital images of my
cervical spine included such statement, “significant central canal stenosis
, spinal cord compression and evidence of signal change in the parenchyma of
the spinal cord”, should this be considered another “objective” finding
by a right specialist physician? Dr. RS April stated to have reviewed, “
Reports dated April 4, 5 and 8, 2019 by Dr. John Caridi were noted”. Why it
is stated as such? There was only one visit from me to Dr. JM Caridi, and
it’s on April 4, 2019. If Dr. RS April had really reviewed the medical
files, why he selectively does not take other neurologist’s opinion as “
objective” about MRI digital images? I do not know why there are five
editions of the C-4.2 & narrative reports in the WCB case folder about that
April 4, 2019 visit, and I do not get the answer why the later editions even
deleted the MRI referral for my spine. IT IS BECAUSE THE INTENTIONAL AND
COORDINATED COVER-UP OF MY HEAD AND SPINE INJURIES MAY BE EXPOSED BY REALLY
OBJECTIVE HIGH-QUALITY MRI. Simply go to the other extreme of diagnosis.
Manual tests when performed simply but properly may or may not be understood
by lay people too. The following sentence in Dr. M Golzad’s Feb. 14, 2018
report, “Plantar reflexes were flexor bilaterally,” is another negligible
“objective” finding to Dr. RS April?
The Dr. RS April report goes to educate about “concussion”, stating one of
its “accepted diagnostic criteria” is “the absence of intracranial
abnormalities on conventional imaging.” The interpretation is that by X-ray
radiation, if abnormalities inside the skull are detected, then the brain
trauma should be evaluated severer than “concussion”; If absent, X-ray
itself can not exclude “concussion”, because X-ray radiology is not
sensitive enough for soft tissues like brain. However, X-ray is an ionizing
radiation, a serious risk to health which may lead to cancer. I was never
told by physicians about risks and side effects. When I brought up the risks
and side effects, I didn’t see others’ share of responsibility. Also,
what if intentional? Why practically impossible to be intentional? X-ray
radiology is cheaper to the employer/insurance, and mainly on bones. A
negative finding by a low-resolution technique X-ray on bones does not mean
a negative finding on the crucial and delicate brain and spinal cord and
nerves.
Also, I have trouble with NUMEROUS specifics stated on the listed medical
files (in a little less than a page in Dr. RS April’s report) which Dr. RS
April reportedly had reviewed. I would name some here. Simple fact such as
date of service (DOS) of many medical reports is even listed wrong or signs
serious problems. There was no visit from me to NYMDC on Jan. 06, 2019; the
actual medical visits to NYMDC were on Jan. 16, and 29, 2019. The NYMDC
report wrote only about Jan. 16, 2019. Why reports by Dr. Mehrdad Golzad
from only February 14 to March 05, 2018 were reviewed? Another IME by Dr. JV
Westerband requested by employer/insurance was generally introduced as “
narrative report”? Although I requested multiple times for a second MRI on
head, I have not been provided such a referral and have not done a such. How
there is a head MRI on Feb. 15, 2019 as listed in Dr. RS April’s report?
Also, the 1st cervical spine MRI without contrast was done on April 12, 2018
, not Feb. 15, 2018. While there are some MRI and X-ray digital images
available at the radiology services, why only some “photocopies” of MRI
images were reviewed to reach an “objective” opinion to disserve the
patient? What are the discernable features on these MRI “photocopies”?
May I have an exact same copy to check their content and quality? Because
the scanned images in the WCB eCase folder are unrecognizable for
information. Why the report stated as “persistent residual headaches”
while my written and spoken complaints include “constant, moderate to
severe, headache”? My written statements about the fall from the 8-ft
broken stepladder (which must had been meticulously tampered by perpetrators
) and my symptoms in recent months have been in the WCB case folder since
June 2019, and more recent versions were provided to some physicians. Why
such statements directly from the injured worker without the restraint of a
prefixed form were not included in this “independent medical examination”
of files only? Why is not the “independent” so subjectively biased against
the injured worker and selectively based on some physicians’ “impression
”?
I have started to state openly that this is a premeditated and coordinated
murder attempt veiled as a work accident to me. It’s so difficult for me to
have the proper diagnosis and treatment since the date of injury. The
obstacles come from so many parties and exist at almost every step. For just
one example, it took me great effort to find a physician, Dr. John M.
Caridi, to provide me a referral for MRI’s on C-, T-, and L-spine, but the
consistent resistance from so many parties to possible objective findings by
an honestly run MRI machine and an honest professional is so subjectively
tremendous. They have been preying on the victim’s immigrant background and
no good familiarity with the law, culture, and medicine. For the sake of
space, by now I would leave many specifics wrapped. But I am determined to
fight with my residual strength for justice, health maintenance, and
compensation, against whatever levels of powers, because they deliberately
want me to suffer and to die.
I have sustained severe head and spine injury due to that fall on January 16
, 2018 at work. Dr. Mehrdad Golzad’s office has been dealing with the head
trauma only, while physicians from New York Medical & Diagnostic Center did
treatment on the whole spine but had not reported as spinal cord and nerves
injuries. The traumatic situations have indeed deteriorated, and if I am
forced with no choice but to help myself only by myself, I must rise up to
my ultimate limit for the challenges.
For the Oct. 03, 2019 hearing, I plea for a referral note and said required
“authorization” of MRI on head, cervical and thoracic spine. The Aug. 15,
2019 C-Spine MRI without contrast was not done to its reachable quality on a
3 Telsa Siemens machine and the axial series did not cover the immediate
adjacent occipital condyles in the crucial craniocervical junction area,
where must have serious trauma. There is evidence that my thoracic spine has
been seriously injured too.
Very Truly,
Limin Wang
Injured Worker&Claimant
P.S. I don’t know why the Robert S. April was also sent to my former
Workers’ Compensation lawyer’s law firm, Bangel, Cohen & Falconetti, LLP.
Would BCF deal with the medical issues now? If BCF has interest in
representing me the injured worker and claimant for my recovery and
interests, I hope that they please address many serious issues for me,
specifically, others’ intentional cause to my fall, the many obstacles to
proper medical diagnosis and treatment immediately since my fall, the more
than 8 months of no compensation of whatsoever, the long-term proper medical
care, the compensation about the permanent damages, and the possible future
vocational rehabilitation and assistance, the said unpaid medical bills,
etc, for the workers’ compensation case. | k**********4
发帖数: 16092 | 2 老王我建议你找个人给你润色一下，现在看起来有点费劲
【在 W*******n 的大作中提到】
: Limin Wang
: 136-09 59th Ave
: Flushing, NY 11355
: Oct. 1, 2019, Tue
: State of New York
: Workers’ Compensation Board
: PO Box 5205
: Binghamton, NY 13902-5205
: WCB Case #: G2029240
: WC Insurance Carrier Case #: 18D48F512440
| W*******n
发帖数: 4140 | 3 润格几把色，你知道我是在如何忍受各方官商来的欺压和煎熬，还要每天忍受严重伤痛
等等。
【在 k**********4 的大作中提到】
: 老王我建议你找个人给你润色一下，现在看起来有点费劲
| W*******n
发帖数: 4140 | 4 不管别人出于何种目的，谁都可以转载、传播我在网上公开的这些实际遭遇。
【在 W*******n 的大作中提到】
: Limin Wang
: 136-09 59th Ave
: Flushing, NY 11355
: Oct. 1, 2019, Tue
: State of New York
: Workers’ Compensation Board
: PO Box 5205
: Binghamton, NY 13902-5205
: WCB Case #: G2029240
: WC Insurance Carrier Case #: 18D48F512440
| W*******n
发帖数: 4140 | 5 那些懂工伤及人身伤害案件的，或自己经历过的，应该读得很容易懂。
【在 W*******n 的大作中提到】
: Limin Wang
: 136-09 59th Ave
: Flushing, NY 11355
: Oct. 1, 2019, Tue
: State of New York
: Workers’ Compensation Board
: PO Box 5205
: Binghamton, NY 13902-5205
: WCB Case #: G2029240
: WC Insurance Carrier Case #: 18D48F512440
| W*******n
发帖数: 4140 | 6 On today's hearing, they changed the play once more, not going for the "
depositions" from my "treating" physicians since the April 05, 2019 hearing,
they are going to send me for another IME to wash their liability off. When
I wanted to even bring up a fact in the case, the WCLJ interrupted me from
saying out. When I said it out that the list of established sites has never
been sent to me by any party in any form, but I found the list in a wrongly
named file in the NYS WCB eCase, the judge played the angry role. That piece
of fact is, the established sites include Neck in an eCase folder file in
2018, but a file in Sept 2019 from the insurance/IME consultant simply took
"Neck" off the list of established sites. What justice I can expect from
such hearings? On the way out of the building back to the street, there were
some people so not American coming within a few inches to me while I was
waiting for a white crossing sign. I will play my own hero.
I, LIMIN WANG, WILL NEVER COMMIT SUICIDE. THEY WANT TO KILL ME ONE WAY OR
ANOTHER NOW TO COVER UP THIS FAKE BUT CORRUPT SYSTEM. I WANT TO EXPOSE THE
TRUTH OF THE AMERICAN SYSTEM I HAVE EXPERIENCED.
【在 W*******n 的大作中提到】
: Limin Wang
: 136-09 59th Ave
: Flushing, NY 11355
: Oct. 1, 2019, Tue
: State of New York
: Workers’ Compensation Board
: PO Box 5205
: Binghamton, NY 13902-5205
: WCB Case #: G2029240
: WC Insurance Carrier Case #: 18D48F512440
|
|
