b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 1 Pompeo accused Chinese company doing business in China of violating American
law...Let that sink for a second |
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 2 Its amazing to me how the USA feels it can globally sanction people and
firms with no connection to the USA, doing legal business outside the USA. |
p*a
发帖数: 7676 | 3 这是美国主权。美国有权禁止任何公司进入美国市场。
American
【在 b*********3 的大作中提到】
: Pompeo accused Chinese company doing business in China of violating American
: law...Let that sink for a second
|
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 4 Again, how does trade between China and Iran violate US law? Isn't this a
slippery slope where one country imposes a "law" and expects all other
countries to abide by it?
【在 p*a 的大作中提到】
: 这是美国主权。美国有权禁止任何公司进入美国市场。
:
: American
|
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 5 Would that be the law of the Universe？ |
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 6 "If the God exist, he's an American" |
r**m
发帖数: 446 | 7 依据美国的国内法，长臂管辖。
【在 b*********3 的大作中提到】
: Again, how does trade between China and Iran violate US law? Isn't this a
: slippery slope where one country imposes a "law" and expects all other
: countries to abide by it?
|
m*******n
发帖数: 4186 | 8 你不用美元不用美国的金融体系，在投票制裁决议时投反对票, 你随便和伊朗做生意。
American
【在 b*********3 的大作中提到】
: Pompeo accused Chinese company doing business in China of violating American
: law...Let that sink for a second
|
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 9 “Chinese company Zhuhai Zhenrong and one of its executives knowingly
violated U.S. law barring the import of Iranian crude oil.”
Hundredth time and still makes no sense. I guess the US is trying to
demonstrate its power by showing it can enforce the utterly absurd. |
p*a
发帖数: 7676 | 10 请再念一遍“美国有权禁止任何公司进入美国市场”。
注意是任何公司。当然包括中国或者伊朗的公司。还要注意的是“美国有权禁止”，是
美国有权，没有任何其他限制，想禁止谁就可以禁止谁。
【在 b*********3 的大作中提到】
: Again, how does trade between China and Iran violate US law? Isn't this a
: slippery slope where one country imposes a "law" and expects all other
: countries to abide by it?
|
|
|
v**o
发帖数: 4956 | |
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 12 “Pompeo said while addressing reporters in Florida, “We’ve said that we
will sanction any sanctionable behavior and we mean it.”
Pompeo’s Yankee education on full display.
It is clear that Pompeo doesn’t seem to understand that China will not just
standby. US companies and individuals will be sanctioned by China, in
retaliation. China is already very angry at the US for army Taiwan, playing
military war game in the South China Sea and creating a color revolution in
Hong Kong.
US laws are not the law of the world and these illegal US sanctions are not
recognized by the UN and other true nation.
Since Pompeo lies on a minute to minute bases, does that mean he has to run
to church for forgiveness on a minute to minute bases?
【在 p*a 的大作中提到】
: 请再念一遍“美国有权禁止任何公司进入美国市场”。
: 注意是任何公司。当然包括中国或者伊朗的公司。还要注意的是“美国有权禁止”，是
: 美国有权，没有任何其他限制，想禁止谁就可以禁止谁。
|
r**m
发帖数: 446 | |
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 14 Remind me, what is the international legal basis for the sanctions? |
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 15 Trump hit the stupid wall again...
US debt to GDP 109.45%
China debt to GDP 54.44%
Japan 234.18%
Trump has really burned the cash... Highest debt to GDP in US history was
126% in 1946. Trump will likely get there just before he is ousted in 2020.
Sanction enough countries and nobody will buy US Debt. Not even the mob. |
c********i
发帖数: 942 | 16 联合国对伊朗的制裁在2015年左右就撤销了吧，后面的只是美国的制裁
使用美元就要受美国管辖，这可太牛逼了，看来全世界所有国家的贸易都要受美国管辖
了。别人赚了美元，原来只赚到了有限的使用权，而美元的管辖权和司法权还在美国手
里，有国际条约这么规定吗？
现在中国制造在世界上到处都是，如果这些中国制造物品的管辖权和司法权也在中国手
里，用途和使用方式都必须中国同意并符合中国法律，那中国就老牛逼了 |
r**m
发帖数: 446 | 17 美国就是这么牛叉，服不服。不用美元也一样管你，只要用了美国的产品，服务，和美
国公司，美国人搭上一点关系都可以管。
【在 c********i 的大作中提到】
: 联合国对伊朗的制裁在2015年左右就撤销了吧，后面的只是美国的制裁
: 使用美元就要受美国管辖，这可太牛逼了，看来全世界所有国家的贸易都要受美国管辖
: 了。别人赚了美元，原来只赚到了有限的使用权，而美元的管辖权和司法权还在美国手
: 里，有国际条约这么规定吗？
: 现在中国制造在世界上到处都是，如果这些中国制造物品的管辖权和司法权也在中国手
: 里，用途和使用方式都必须中国同意并符合中国法律，那中国就老牛逼了
|
c********i
发帖数: 942 | 18 你牛你别印美元给人用啊
别人可没强迫美国印美元给人用 |
