由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 蓝皮抽私又一重大利好
相关主题
中国人喜欢看戏,看drama,但trump真的上台是很危险的现在流行这个游戏 (转载)
F-1 Students: Tell DHS to Fix the 2008 OPT STEM Extension三哥要载人登月了!
CPT Game Over当年基辛格把周相都忽悠了
古狗装啥孙子啊,难道美国没有censorship?看看乌克兰傻叉94年被忽悠放弃核武器
泰国交通部长:中泰高铁2011年将按时开工!!安理会紧急开会:俄称亚努科维奇请普京出兵
惊奇:普世欧盟竟有如此税种——“视频税”!!乌请求美英保其领土
谁在鼓吹社会达尔文主义中国在WTO又输了一城ZT
暴发户茅于轼鼓吹以学历分类剥夺“垃圾人”的生育权地球人口太多是个谎言
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: evidence话题: september话题: uscis话题: filings话题: request
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c****x
发帖数: 6601
1
New USCIS Policy Guidance Gives Adjudicators Full Discretion to Deny Without
First Issuing an RFE or a NOID
By ImmigrationGirl July 13, 2018
Effective September 11, 2018, a new Policy Memorandum from USCIS allows
immigration filings to be denied without first issuing a Request for
Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny. The “good” news is that this will
not be applied retroactively, meaning it will only be applied to cases filed
after September 11, 2018.
The memo rescinds a prior memo issued in 2013 which had required RFEs to be
issued unless there was no possibility that additional documents or
information could cure a deficiency.
Instead, new filings lacking required initial evidence can be denied without
first sending a Request for Evidence.
According to the memo, this policy is “intended to discourage frivolous or
substantially incomplete filings used as “placeholder” filings and
encourage applicants, petitioners, and requestors to be diligent in
collecting and submitting required evidence. It is not intended to penalize
filers for innocent mistakes or misunderstandings of evidentiary
requirements.”
For cases filed after September 11, 2018, if all required initial evidence
is not submitted with the benefit request, USCIS in its discretion may deny
the benefit request for failure to establish eligibility based on lack of
required initial evidence.
Cases can be denied without RFE where the regulations, the statute, or form
instructions require the submission of particular evidence establishing
eligibility at the time of filing and there is no submission of the required
evidence.
Furthermore, apart from RFEs, officers have the discretion to validate
assertions or corroborate evidence and information by consulting USCIS or
other governmental files, systems, and databases, or by obtaining publicly
available information that is readily accessible. For example, an officer
may, in the exercise of discretion, verify information relating to a
petitioner’s corporate
structure by consulting a publicly available state business website. As
another example, an officer may attempt to corroborate evidence relating to
an individual’s history of nonimmigrant stays in the United States by
searching a nonpublic, U.S. government database.
What does this mean for filings beginning September 11th? Be sure that all
required evidence is submitted with the filing. Employers should ensure that
all necessary documents for approval are submitted with the application and
should not expect a later opportunity to submit them by waiting for an RFE.
If you are looking for a silver lining in this memo, maybe, just maybe it
will help reduce the long processing times for various employment-based
applications because there won’t be as much back and forth waiting for
responses to RFEs.
This will certainly make FY2020 H-1B cap filing season more interesting&#
8230;
1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
地球人口太多是个谎言泰国交通部长:中泰高铁2011年将按时开工!!
有没人和我一样,一想到人口就对未来没信心了惊奇:普世欧盟竟有如此税种——“视频税”!!
有孩的H1B这次爽了谁在鼓吹社会达尔文主义
忽悠老中多生的不如忽悠政府把生育指标和纳税挂钩暴发户茅于轼鼓吹以学历分类剥夺“垃圾人”的生育权
中国人喜欢看戏,看drama,但trump真的上台是很危险的现在流行这个游戏 (转载)
F-1 Students: Tell DHS to Fix the 2008 OPT STEM Extension三哥要载人登月了!
CPT Game Over当年基辛格把周相都忽悠了
古狗装啥孙子啊,难道美国没有censorship?看看乌克兰傻叉94年被忽悠放弃核武器
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: evidence话题: september话题: uscis话题: filings话题: request