c****h
发帖数: 4968 | 1 逛了几个主要媒体网站。基本都很neutral，下面几个给了差评
CNBC：
GLOBAL INVESTING HOT SPOTS Why China 'holds all the aces' in a full-blown US
-China trade war
偏左的WaPo:
Trump’s tariffs are already backfiring
极左的NYT：
Chinese Tariffs Are Already Hitting Trump Voters | a******9
发帖数: 20431 | 2 左媒不管川普干什么都会反
只能看WSJ和fox
：逛了几个主要媒体网站。基本都很neutral，下面几个给了差评
：CNBC： | P**T
发帖数: 2274 | 3 中美这种级别的较量，要开战肯定是全面大打出手了，不可能小打小闹
建制派最怕疮总这个纨绔子弟到了关键时刻要掉链子 | c****h
发帖数: 4968 | 4 WSJ还行，FOXNews只能当笑料看看。NBC也还好.NBC下面这段分析的很好。中美间巨额
逆差被高估了，而且逆差里很难说谁吃亏了。
But before evaluating the policy prescriptions for this problem, we must
first consider the starting point, which is flawed. The current $370 billion
deficit estimate does not account for value-added. When looking at the
value-added content of Chinese exports, the U.S. deficit with China is
actually only half of what it seems. And if we then add back the U.S.
surplus in "invisibles" and how much money the United States brings back
from investments in China, the U.S.–China deficit shrinks from 2 percent of
U.S. GDP to 0.8 percent, a report from Oxford Economics revealed.
In the case of the Apple iPhone, this means that China's exports balance
accounts for the full $500 iPhone value, when China adds only approximately
$15 to $30 of the value to the phone. Most of the iPhone value accretes to
Samsung in Korea ($150) and to Apple — the brand owner and engineer. This
highlights how the normal accounting of trade flows is inherently distorted
under the current trade-deficit estimates. So maybe the deck has only 25 not
52 cards.
【在 a******9 的大作中提到】
: 左媒不管川普干什么都会反
: 只能看WSJ和fox
:
: ：逛了几个主要媒体网站。基本都很neutral，下面几个给了差评
: ：CNBC：
| a******d
发帖数: 955 | 5 不光是逆差，这次是打知识产权问题
billion
of
【在 c****h 的大作中提到】
: WSJ还行，FOXNews只能当笑料看看。NBC也还好.NBC下面这段分析的很好。中美间巨额
: 逆差被高估了，而且逆差里很难说谁吃亏了。
: But before evaluating the policy prescriptions for this problem, we must
: first consider the starting point, which is flawed. The current $370 billion
: deficit estimate does not account for value-added. When looking at the
: value-added content of Chinese exports, the U.S. deficit with China is
: actually only half of what it seems. And if we then add back the U.S.
: surplus in "invisibles" and how much money the United States brings back
: from investments in China, the U.S.–China deficit shrinks from 2 percent of
: U.S. GDP to 0.8 percent, a report from Oxford Economics revealed.
|
|
