b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 1 "we are going to have to dump all those emails"
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/new-leaks
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841
“On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have
to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later"
In this email, John Podesta writes to Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that "we are
going to have to dump all those emails" RIGHT after the famous New York
Times story broke about Hillary's private email server. They realized they'd
have to destroy evidence as it had been made public. The congressional
subpoena came two days later.
They discussed the destruction of evidence in this email prior to the
official subpoena orders, due to the fact that now that their secret was
exposed, they knew they would be subpoenaed shortly, which turned out to be
the next day. They hadn't got the order yet, but they saw the writing on the
wall.
However, this is still illegal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) and 18 U.S. Code
§ 1519.
It's called Spoliation, which means if you don't have a subpoena in hand but
its reasonable to assume one is incoming, it is still illegal to destroy
evidence.
It is unclear who "Lanny" is referring to. According to Zerohedge, Lanny
could be "the infamous former DOJ staffer Lanny Breuer who quit in January
2013 after telling Frontline that some banks are too big to fail, or, more
likely Lanny Davis, special counsel to President Bill Clinton, and
spokesperson for the President and the White House on matters concerning
campaign-finance investigations and other legal issues."
This email exchange almost assuredly signals that there was intent to
mislead and delete incriminating emails, something the Clinton campaign has
been trying to deny for quite some time. |
|
