G*******n
发帖数: 6889 | 1 不是一个层次的。前者是那年代标准留米小留的基本土著水平，后者是非英语国家外教
出的top 20% percentile的水平，单字单句听上去字正腔圆，但连起来听，缺乏语感和
连贯性。
说她俩英语“一般”或“不怎么样”的都是睁眼说瞎话的扯淡。
想不到这个都能有争议。 |
z**********e
发帖数: 22064 | 2 宋美龄10岁赴美20岁回国，学语言最好的年龄都在美国度过。
有人说，与其夸她“英文说得好”，不如夸她“会说中文”更合适。 |
s*******1
发帖数: 16479 | 3 Re这个。宋英文好应该的
【在 z**********e 的大作中提到】
: 宋美龄10岁赴美20岁回国，学语言最好的年龄都在美国度过。
: 有人说，与其夸她“英文说得好”，不如夸她“会说中文”更合适。
|
q***i
发帖数: 627 | 4 她和他姐的国语发音估计连锁男的英语都不如！不如小蒋和老蒋的 |
h*****7
发帖数: 3192 | 5 宋的上海普通话还是蛮好的，比她老公的话好懂。
【在 q***i 的大作中提到】
: 她和他姐的国语发音估计连锁男的英语都不如！不如小蒋和老蒋的
|
Y**W
发帖数: 100 | 6 这个比较没有意义。宋在美国受教育，英语好时理所当然的。如果比英语是不是也可以
比比唱歌？ |
xt
发帖数: 17532 | 7 这倒是真的。连她自己都说自己除了皮肤是黄的其他都不亚洲。
【在 z**********e 的大作中提到】
: 宋美龄10岁赴美20岁回国，学语言最好的年龄都在美国度过。
: 有人说，与其夸她“英文说得好”，不如夸她“会说中文”更合适。
|
x****o
发帖数: 21566 | 8 这有什么想不到的，整个廊坊都通知过了
【在 G*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不是一个层次的。前者是那年代标准留米小留的基本土著水平，后者是非英语国家外教
: 出的top 20% percentile的水平，单字单句听上去字正腔圆，但连起来听，缺乏语感和
: 连贯性。
: 说她俩英语“一般”或“不怎么样”的都是睁眼说瞎话的扯淡。
: 想不到这个都能有争议。
|
s*********e
发帖数: 5245 | 9 口语只是微不足道的一点，宋最牛的是整个演讲的节奏和气势，可以说前无古人，后无
来者。就是美国女流，都无出其右者。看她是如何结束的。
宋美龄1943年2月18日对美国参众两院的演说 完全原始录音
http://media.nara.gov/mopix/audio/ww2/12-11.mp3
向民族主义世纪伟人敬礼！
英文稿
Mr. Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives of the United States:
At any time it would be a privilege for me to address Congress, more
especially this present august body which will have so much to do in shaping
the destiny of the world. In speaking to Congress I am literally speaking
to the American people. The Seventy-seventh Congress, as their
representatives, fulfilled the obligations and responsibilities of its trust
by declaring war on the aggressors. That part of the duty of the people’s
representatives was discharged in 1941. The task now confronting you is to
help win the war and to create and uphold a lasting peace which will justify
the sacrifices and sufferings of the victims of aggression.
Before enlarging on this subject, I should like to tell you a little about
my long and vividly interesting trip to your country from my own land which
has bled and borne unflinchingly the burden of war for more than 5 1/2 years
. I shall not dwell, however, upon the part China has played in our united
effort to free mankind from brutality and violence. I shall try to convey to
you, however imperfectly, the impressions gained during the trip.
First of all, I want to assure you that the American people have every right
to be proud of their fighting men in so many parts of the world. I am
particularly thinking of those of your boys in the far-flung, ut-of-the-way
stations and areas where life is attended by dreary drabness—this because
their duty is not one of spectacular performance and they are not buoyed up
by excitement of battle. They are called upon, day after colorless day, to
perform routine duties such as safeguarding defenses and preparing for
possible enemy action. It has been said, and I find it true from personal
experience, that it is easier to risk one’s life on the battlefield than it
is to perform customary humble and humdrum duties which, however, are just
as necessary to winning the war. Some of your troops are stationed in
isolated spots quite out of reach of ordinary communications. Some of your
boys have had to fly hundreds of hours over the sea from an improvised
airfield in quests often disappointingly fruitless, of enemy submarines.
They, and others, have to stand the monotony of waiting—just waiting. But,
as I told them, true patriotism lies in possessing the morale and physical
stamina to perform faithfully and conscientiously the daily tasks so that in
the sum total the weakest link is the strongest.
Your soldiers have shown conclusively that they are able stoically to endure
homesickness, the glaring dryness, and scorching heat of the Tropics, and
keep themselves fit and in excellent fighting trim. They are amongst the
unsung heroes of this war, and everything possible to lighten their tedium
and buoy up their morale should be done. That sacred duty is yours. The
American Army is better fed than any army in the world. This does not mean,
however, that they can live indefinitely on canned food without having the
effects tell on them. These admittedly are the minor hardships of war,
especially when we pause to consider that in many parts of the world,
starvation prevails. But peculiarly enough, oftentimes it is not the major
problems of existence which irk a man’s soul; it is rather the pin pricks,
especially those incidental to a life of deadly sameness, with tempers
frayed out and nervous systems torn to shreds.
The second impression of my trip is that America is not only the cauldron of
democracy, but the incubator of democratic principles. At some of the
places I visited, I met the crews of your air bases. There I found first
generation Germans, Italians, Frenchmen, Poles, Czechoslovakians, and other
nationals. Some of them had accents so thick that, if such a thing were
possible, one could not cut them with a butter knife. But there they were—
all Americans, all devoted to the same ideals, all working for the same
cause and united by the same high purpose. No suspicion or rivalry existed
between them. This increased my belief and faith that devotion to common
principles eliminates differences in race, and that identity of ideals is
the strongest possible solvent of racial dissimilarities.
I have reached your country, therefore, with no misgivings, but with my
belief that the American people are building and carrying out a true pattern
of the Nation conceived by your forebears, strengthened and confirmed. You,
as epresentatives of the American people, have before you the glorious
opportunity of carrying on the pioneer work of your ancestors, beyond the
frontiers of physical and geographical limitations. Their brawn and thews
braved undauntedly almost unbelievable hardships to open up a new continent.
The modern world lauds them for their vigor and intensity of purpose, and
for their accomplishment. Your have today before you the immeasurably
greater opportunity to implement these same ideals and to help bring about
the liberation of man’s spirit in every part of the world. In order to
accomplish this purpose, we of the United Nations must now so prosecute the
war that victory will be ours decisively and with all good speed.
Sun-tse, the well-known Chinese strategist said, “In order to win, know
thyself and thy enemy.” We have also the saying: “It takes little effort
to watch the other fellow carry the load.”
In spite of these teachings from a wise old past, which are shared by every
nation, there has been a tendency to belittle the strength of our opponents.
When Japan thrust total war on China in 1937 military experts of every
nation did not give China even a ghost of a chance. But when Japan failed to
bring China cringing to her knees as she vaunted, the world took solace in
this phenomenon by declaring that they had overestimated Japan’s military
might.
Nevertheless, when the greedy flames of war inexorably spread in the Pacific
following the perfidious attack on Pearl Harbor, Malaya, and lands in and
around the China Sea, and one after another of these places fell, the
pendulum swung to the other extreme. Doubts and fears lifted their ugly
heads and the world began to think that the Japanese were Nietzschean
supermen, superior in intellect and physical prowess, a belief which the
Gobineaus and the Houston Chamberlains and their apt pupils, the Nazi
racists, had propounded about the Nordics.
Again, now the prevailing opinion seems to consider the defeat of the
Japanese as of relative unimportance and that Hitler is our first concern.
This is not borne out by actual facts, nor is it to the interests of the
United Nations as a whole to allow Japan to continue not only as a vital
potential threat but as a waiting sword of Damocles, ready to descend at a
moment’s notice.
Let us not forget that Japan in her occupied areas today has greater
resources at her command than Germany.
Let us not forget that the longer Japan is left in undisputed possession of
these resources, the stronger she must become. Each passing day takes more
toll in lives of both Americans and Chinese.
Let us not forget that the Japanese are an intransigent people.
Let us not forget that during the first 4 1/2 years of total aggression
China has borne Japan’s sadistic fury unaided and alone.
The victories won by the United Sates Navy at Midway and the Coral Sea are
doubtless steps in the right direction—they are merely steps in the right
direction—for the magnificent fight that was waged at Guadalcanal during
the past 6 months attests to the fact that the defeat of the forces of evil
though long and arduous will finally come to pass. For have we not on the
side of righteousness and justice staunch allies in Great Britain, Russia,
and other brave and indomitable peoples? Meanwhile the peril of the Japanese
juggernaut remains. Japanese military might must be decimated as a fighting
force before its threat to civilization is removed.
When the Seventy-seventh Congress declared war against Japan, Germany, and
Italy, Congress for the moment had done its work. It now remains for you,
the present Representatives of the American people, to point the way to win
the war, to help construct a world in which all peoples may henceforth live
in harmony and peace.
May I not hope that it is the resolve of Congress to devote itself to the
creation of the post-war world? To dedicate itself to the preparation for
the brighter future that a stricken world so eagerly awaits?
We of this generation who are privileged to help make a better world for
ourselves and for posterity should remember that, while we must not be
visionary, we must have vision so that peace should not be punitive in
spirit and should not be provincial or nationalistic or even continental in
concept, but universal in scope and humanitarian in action, for modern
science has so annihilated distance that what affects one people must of
necessity affect all other peoples.
The term “hands and feet” is often used in China to signify the
relationship between brothers. Since international interdependence is now so
universally recognized, can we not also say that all nations should become
members of one corporate body?
The 160 years of traditional friendship between our two great peoples, China
and America,which has never been marred by misunderstandings, is
unsurpassed in the annals of the world.
I can also assure you that China is eager and ready to cooperate with you
and other peoples to lay a true and lasting foundation for a sane and
progressive world society which would make it impossible for any arrogant or
predatory neighbor to plunge future generations into another orgy of blood.
In the past China has not computed the cost to her manpower in her fight
against aggression, although she well realized that manpower is the real
wealth of a nation and it takes generations to grow it. She has been soberly
conscious of her responsibilities and has not concerned herself with
privileges and gains which she might have obtained through compromise of
principles. Nor will she demean herself and all she holds dear to the
practice of the market place.
We in China, like you, want a better world, not for ourselves alone, but for
all mankind, and we must have it. It is not enough, however, to proclaim
our ideals or even to be convinced that we have them. In order to preserve,
uphold, and maintain them, there are times when we should throw all we
cherish into our effort to fulfill these ideals even at the risk of failure.
The teachings drawn from our late leader, Dr. Sun Yat-sen, have given our
people the fortitude to carry on. From 5 1/2 years of experience we in China
are convinced that it is the better part of wisdom not to accept failure
ignominiously, but to risk it gloriously. We shall have faith that, at the
writing of peace, American and our other gallant allies will not be obtunded
by the mirage of contingent reasons of expediency.
Man’s mettle is tested both in adversity and in success. Twice is this true
of the soul of a nation.
【在 G*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不是一个层次的。前者是那年代标准留米小留的基本土著水平，后者是非英语国家外教
: 出的top 20% percentile的水平，单字单句听上去字正腔圆，但连起来听，缺乏语感和
: 连贯性。
: 说她俩英语“一般”或“不怎么样”的都是睁眼说瞎话的扯淡。
: 想不到这个都能有争议。
|
s*********e
发帖数: 5245 | 10 特别是后半部分11分以后，可以是是气势磅礴，声动山河，悄然嘎然结束，让人深思。
可以说，每一个华人今天的生命都直接间接得得益与这个伟大得演讲。
美玲不朽，永留丹青！
States:
shaping
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 口语只是微不足道的一点，宋最牛的是整个演讲的节奏和气势，可以说前无古人，后无
: 来者。就是美国女流，都无出其右者。看她是如何结束的。
: 宋美龄1943年2月18日对美国参众两院的演说 完全原始录音
: http://media.nara.gov/mopix/audio/ww2/12-11.mp3
: 向民族主义世纪伟人敬礼！
: 英文稿
: Mr. Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives of the United States:
: At any time it would be a privilege for me to address Congress, more
: especially this present august body which will have so much to do in shaping
: the destiny of the world. In speaking to Congress I am literally speaking
|
|
|
o**s
发帖数: 891 | 11 不论语言，论政治能力，美玲胜出
States:
shaping
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 口语只是微不足道的一点，宋最牛的是整个演讲的节奏和气势，可以说前无古人，后无
: 来者。就是美国女流，都无出其右者。看她是如何结束的。
: 宋美龄1943年2月18日对美国参众两院的演说 完全原始录音
: http://media.nara.gov/mopix/audio/ww2/12-11.mp3
: 向民族主义世纪伟人敬礼！
: 英文稿
: Mr. Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives of the United States:
: At any time it would be a privilege for me to address Congress, more
: especially this present august body which will have so much to do in shaping
: the destiny of the world. In speaking to Congress I am literally speaking
|
c*****z
发帖数: 3090 | 12 太崇拜了，这不仅仅是发音的拙劣，这文稿，语气，气势，太震撼了
States:
shaping
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 口语只是微不足道的一点，宋最牛的是整个演讲的节奏和气势，可以说前无古人，后无
: 来者。就是美国女流，都无出其右者。看她是如何结束的。
: 宋美龄1943年2月18日对美国参众两院的演说 完全原始录音
: http://media.nara.gov/mopix/audio/ww2/12-11.mp3
: 向民族主义世纪伟人敬礼！
: 英文稿
: Mr. Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives of the United States:
: At any time it would be a privilege for me to address Congress, more
: especially this present august body which will have so much to do in shaping
: the destiny of the world. In speaking to Congress I am literally speaking
|
G*******n
发帖数: 6889 | |
s*********e
发帖数: 5245 | 14 宋演讲的目的是争取美国国会对中国抗战的援助。但她不卑不亢，没有一个恳求的词，
却打动了美国人的心灵。要知道，那个时候美国还有排华法案，华人的地位连黑奴都不
如。妇女也没有选举权，参众两院都是一群大男子主义和种族主义的白人爷们。这个演
讲，可以说，彻底改变了美国人民对华人的印象。历史贡献至巨。宋坐轮船长途颠簸，
来了后还病了。
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn5ldOnrDGE
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nTOq4WttKpQ
宋在美国巡回的演讲也很好。
有一个仔纽约的，也不卑不亢，直指人心。
【在 c*****z 的大作中提到】
: 太崇拜了，这不仅仅是发音的拙劣，这文稿，语气，气势，太震撼了
:
: States:
: shaping
|
k*l
发帖数: 2574 | 15 士林官邸有听。公开演讲的控制是不错，不过吹成这样也不至于 |
B*Q
发帖数: 25729 | |
k*******r
发帖数: 16963 | 17 美玲演讲算个屁的牛，最牛是美玲要求美国人用原子弹核平大陆。
States:
shaping
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 口语只是微不足道的一点，宋最牛的是整个演讲的节奏和气势，可以说前无古人，后无
: 来者。就是美国女流，都无出其右者。看她是如何结束的。
: 宋美龄1943年2月18日对美国参众两院的演说 完全原始录音
: http://media.nara.gov/mopix/audio/ww2/12-11.mp3
: 向民族主义世纪伟人敬礼！
: 英文稿
: Mr. Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives of the United States:
: At any time it would be a privilege for me to address Congress, more
: especially this present august body which will have so much to do in shaping
: the destiny of the world. In speaking to Congress I am literally speaking
|
C*******f
发帖数: 13152 | 18 可惜短短5年，政治能力急转直下，43年在美国就被国粉吹捧成这样，到了48年杜鲁门
就敢讽刺她来是为了再得到一些施舍，哎，怎么就不再象当年了呢？怎么就不能用一个
演讲再次打动美国议会呢？好奇怪啊。
其实吧，我看美玲更像是土共卧底，43年抗日就使出浑身解数要来援助，48年内战就不
买力气了，要来了的也是打土共。到后来联合国席位的事其实完全有可能搞出两个中国
或一中一台来，结果美玲愣是不同意，从此呆湾就一直被不停矮化，这不是土共卧底是
啥啊？在一中的问题上土共是要给美玲发勋章的，哈哈
【在 o**s 的大作中提到】
: 不论语言，论政治能力，美玲胜出
:
: States:
: shaping
|
g******n
发帖数: 53185 | 19 让一个女人出头去向异族乞讨，是本民族男人的耻辱。 |
s******1
发帖数: 501 | 20 一针见血。
【在 Y**W 的大作中提到】
: 这个比较没有意义。宋在美国受教育，英语好时理所当然的。如果比英语是不是也可以
: 比比唱歌？
|
|
|
l**********n
发帖数: 1742 | 21 常宋米玲是否外发
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 G*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不是一个层次的。前者是那年代标准留米小留的基本土著水平，后者是非英语国家外教
: 出的top 20% percentile的水平，单字单句听上去字正腔圆，但连起来听，缺乏语感和
: 连贯性。
: 说她俩英语“一般”或“不怎么样”的都是睁眼说瞎话的扯淡。
: 想不到这个都能有争议。
|
z***u
发帖数: 1466 | |
x**j
发帖数: 83 | 23 宋的英语好？典型的Chinglish发音!当然是较好的Chinglish。 |
d******r
发帖数: 16947 | 24 尼玛夸宋英语好等于夸彭普通话好 lol
【在 G*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不是一个层次的。前者是那年代标准留米小留的基本土著水平，后者是非英语国家外教
: 出的top 20% percentile的水平，单字单句听上去字正腔圆，但连起来听，缺乏语感和
: 连贯性。
: 说她俩英语“一般”或“不怎么样”的都是睁眼说瞎话的扯淡。
: 想不到这个都能有争议。
|
l**********n
发帖数: 1742 | 25 彭的普通话比宋的英语地道一万倍
宋米零不忠不孝就是个外发
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 d******r 的大作中提到】
: 尼玛夸宋英语好等于夸彭普通话好 lol
|
c*****0
发帖数: 89 | 26 宋在床上征服过高端老外，她有那个气度。
彭。。。从国人圈子里走出来，这是她目前能做到的。
深度外f和努力去说外语怎么能去比较。 |
p****n
发帖数: 1820 | 27 哈哈哈
【在 c*****z 的大作中提到】
: 太崇拜了，这不仅仅是发音的拙劣，这文稿，语气，气势，太震撼了
:
: States:
: shaping
|
l******f
发帖数: 744 | 28
把彭丽媛和宋比演讲没意义，虽说彭肯定不是自己写的。宋应该是自己写的，即使有人
相助，她自己一定是积极参与其中写稿的，其实她的演讲稿用词上有瑕疵，记得有评论
说过有些词汇美国人并不这么用，有点生搬硬套。
【在 B*Q 的大作中提到】
: 美龄和丽媛应该都不是自己写的稿子吧
|
s***r
发帖数: 783 | 29 难道她10岁前居然没学会说中文？
学语言最好的年龄是10到20岁？
【在 z**********e 的大作中提到】
: 宋美龄10岁赴美20岁回国，学语言最好的年龄都在美国度过。
: 有人说，与其夸她“英文说得好”，不如夸她“会说中文”更合适。
|
r******g
发帖数: 691 | 30 宋的讲稿是美国著名公共关系公司给起草的。演讲也有公关公司排练。忽略这个环节，
如何关于宋的英语水平的讨论都是扯淡。
宋的中文肯定比英文好。早期华侨对中华文明的信心比今天北美猥琐男高出许多。中文
教育比阴文扎实多了。 孙中山的国文比英语利索。 宋在西安事变是给老蒋的信，以及
几十年后给廖承志的信，无论修辞还是书法，都堪称典范。 |
|
|
C*****e
发帖数: 2102 | 31 宋美龄这辈子干了三件提的上台面的事情，为中国向美国争取抗日援助，到西安与老公
共患难，组织抚养空军烈士子女。糟糕的事太多就不提了。以前很讨厌她，觉得她是误
国那种。后来看国民党给她拍的传记片，就是个争强好胜本事又不大的那种人，老师问
问题马上举手我会只有我会的小孩，从小学就被人讨厌，倒是没什么坏心眼。
至于宋当年的演讲，我以前看的报道是说挺被美国人诟病的，用词艰深炫耀多于真诚。
这次看了全文，其实用词并不难，但是从句实在太多，很不像演讲稿。听的人会很累。
这大概是当时人家的感受。另外写稿的人不懂说故事，这种演讲应该是特别贴近大众，
用两个具体的小故事打动人，越具体越好，最后总结一下拔高就可以。写稿的全篇高大
上反而让人听的乏味。
那次宋美龄来，是美国人最爱的故事，自己培养的孩子成了别国的第一夫人。加上又是
共同抗日跟美国利益一致，钱反正一定会给的。当然她的仪态也满足了美国人的虚荣心
。也算双赢吧。再来要钱给自己打仗就是另一回事了。
拿宋跟彭比嘛，在我心里彭高太多了。彭是实打实自己奋斗出来的。宋的优势全是来源
于家里和劳工，有这么个资源她也没成就啥事。留下一堆劣迹。她自己都说，老天让她
活那么久就是种惩罚。 |
o*******k
发帖数: 562 | 32 这哥是美玲的后代吧？不过我老听说美玲不育的啊。难道我被蒙骗了？
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 特别是后半部分11分以后，可以是是气势磅礴，声动山河，悄然嘎然结束，让人深思。
: 可以说，每一个华人今天的生命都直接间接得得益与这个伟大得演讲。
: 美玲不朽，永留丹青！
:
: States:
: shaping
|
r******t
发帖数: 8967 | 33 舔的好！拿江青比梅林也就罢了。。。
【在 C*****e 的大作中提到】
: 宋美龄这辈子干了三件提的上台面的事情，为中国向美国争取抗日援助，到西安与老公
: 共患难，组织抚养空军烈士子女。糟糕的事太多就不提了。以前很讨厌她，觉得她是误
: 国那种。后来看国民党给她拍的传记片，就是个争强好胜本事又不大的那种人，老师问
: 问题马上举手我会只有我会的小孩，从小学就被人讨厌，倒是没什么坏心眼。
: 至于宋当年的演讲，我以前看的报道是说挺被美国人诟病的，用词艰深炫耀多于真诚。
: 这次看了全文，其实用词并不难，但是从句实在太多，很不像演讲稿。听的人会很累。
: 这大概是当时人家的感受。另外写稿的人不懂说故事，这种演讲应该是特别贴近大众，
: 用两个具体的小故事打动人，越具体越好，最后总结一下拔高就可以。写稿的全篇高大
: 上反而让人听的乏味。
: 那次宋美龄来，是美国人最爱的故事，自己培养的孩子成了别国的第一夫人。加上又是
|
C*****e
发帖数: 2102 | 34 有理说理。没理搅三分说的是你这种人吧。
【在 r******t 的大作中提到】
: 舔的好！拿江青比梅林也就罢了。。。
|
r******t
发帖数: 8967 | 35 10年后谁还记得彭？二代三代四代国母叫什么名字你还记得吗？别回答我宋祖英。
【在 C*****e 的大作中提到】
: 有理说理。没理搅三分说的是你这种人吧。
|
s**********e
发帖数: 33562 | 36 大家肯定能记住彭
【在 r******t 的大作中提到】
: 10年后谁还记得彭？二代三代四代国母叫什么名字你还记得吗？别回答我宋祖英。
|
r******t
发帖数: 8967 | 37 why？以后大家英语都好了，每代国母都会跑来英语发言。再说，就算十年后我们还记
得彭，七十年后我们的曾孙会知道她吗？梅林是近代史上有名有姓的
人物。硬要比的话前一个是老佛爷，后一个是江青。再往后，暂时还没有。
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 大家肯定能记住彭
|
P******0
发帖数: 9787 | 38 世纪伟人，笑死人了，哈哈哈。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.4
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 口语只是微不足道的一点，宋最牛的是整个演讲的节奏和气势，可以说前无古人，后无
: 来者。就是美国女流，都无出其右者。看她是如何结束的。
: 宋美龄1943年2月18日对美国参众两院的演说 完全原始录音
: http://media.nara.gov/mopix/audio/ww2/12-11.mp3
: 向民族主义世纪伟人敬礼！
: 英文稿
: Mr. Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives of the United States:
: At any time it would be a privilege for me to address Congress, more
: especially this present august body which will have so much to do in shaping
: the destiny of the world. In speaking to Congress I am literally speaking
|
p********n
发帖数: 3367 | |
h********7
发帖数: 126 | 40 宋美龄确实不简单啊， 人家是小三，小四，还是小五，竟能上位至第一夫人。。。 看
我们今天的小三小四们在大街上被原配扯着头发暴打。。。很多最终不得上位。。。 |
|
|
h********7
发帖数: 126 | 41 宋美龄确实不简单啊， 人家是小三，小四，还是小五，竟能上位至第一夫人。。。 看
我们今天的小三小四们在大街上被原配扯着头发暴打。。。很多最终不得上位。。。
【在 s******1 的大作中提到】
: 一针见血。
|
h********7
发帖数: 126 | 42 宋美龄确实不简单啊， 人家是小三，小四，还是小五，竟能上位至第一夫人。。。 看
我们今天的小三小四们在大街上被原配扯着头发暴打。。。很多最终不得上位。。。 |
h********7
发帖数: 126 | 43 宋美龄确实不简单啊， 人家是小三，小四，还是小五，竟能上位至第一夫人。。。 看
我们今天的小三小四们在大街上被原配扯着头发暴打。。。很多最终不得上位。。。
【在 s******1 的大作中提到】
: 一针见血。
|
r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | 44 就历史留名而言，彭肯定比美龄差远了。
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 大家肯定能记住彭
|
p******o
发帖数: 9007 | 45 就历史留名而言，宋美龄比妲己肯定差远了。
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: 就历史留名而言，彭肯定比美龄差远了。
|
C*****e
发帖数: 2102 | 46 拿留名这事评价人的水平？你小年轻吗？报纸上那么多系列杀人犯都比你有名，希普森
案二十年了还有人纪念。你觉得这些人都比你强?
美龄会被人记住她传奇般的家世，她的好胜傲慢，和她为袒护家人不惜误国。除了家世
一项，其余是什么好事？
别老国母国母的，第一夫人是个事实性陈述。国母是个尊称，这些人还没谁配得上。
【在 r******t 的大作中提到】
: 10年后谁还记得彭？二代三代四代国母叫什么名字你还记得吗？别回答我宋祖英。
|
