a*******m
发帖数: 14194 | 1 真是学科学的人的耻辱呀，二氧化碳竟然成了污染物。
这帮子人也真是能忽悠，从全球变暖，忽悠到全球气候变化。
地球本来就是个不停在变动的系统，你prevent个屁呀？
美国要真是玩减少碳排放，也是有可能做到的，直接把烧煤的电厂，
全关了，换成烧天然气的电厂就差不多了。
但是，这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。
就跟你把上好的花梨木，当柴烧，生火做饭是一回事。
农民都不这么傻逼，都知道，最没用的料用来烧锅。
美国的一帮子人实在是太不像话了。
中国要减少污染，要环保，但是，烧天然气发电，拿花梨木烧锅的事，
是坚决不能干的。
美帝这帮骗子有点丧心病狂了！
Obama Announces Rule to Cut Carbon Emissions From Power Plants
http://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-announces-rule-to-cut-carbon-
By COLLEEN MCCAIN NELSONand AMY HARDER
Updated Aug. 3, 2015 7:33 p.m. ET
631 COMMENTS
WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama’s announcement Monday of an aggressive
plan to cut carbon emissions from U.S. power plants launched what will be a
monthslong push that the administration hopes culminates in a global climate
accord later this year.
While the first-ever limits on carbon emissions are a crucial component of
the president’s domestic agenda, the regulations also are integral to Mr.
Obama’s efforts to position the U.S. as a leader on the world stage. Nearly
200 countries are working toward completing a climate deal in Paris in
December. The issue also is expected to be high on the agenda when Mr. Obama
meets with Pope Francis next month, on the heels of a papal encyclical
calling for a cultural revolution to combat climate change.
U.S. power plants account for just 5% of global carbon emissions. But
administration officials have said that if the U.S. leads on this issue,
other nations would follow, and the new plan allows the president to show
progress at home.
“If we don’t do it, nobody will. The only reason that China is now looking
at getting serious about its emissions is because they saw that we were
going to do it, too,” Mr. Obama said Monday at the White House. “When the
world faces its toughest challenges, America leads the way forward.”
The limits on carbon emissions are a central component of the U.S.’s pledge
to its international partners to cut greenhouse gases by a range of 26% to
28% by 2025, from 2005 levels. The final Environmental Protection Agency
rule requires a 32% cut in power-plant carbon-dioxide emissions by 2030 from
2005 levels, which is a more ambitious target than the draft rules proposed
last year.
As President Obama sets a bold course for lowering carbon emissions to
combat climate change, who will benefit and who may pay a price? Photo: AP
READ MORE ON CAPITAL JOURNAL
Capital Journal is WSJ.com’s home for politics, policy and national
security news.
Impact of Emissions Rule on Industry to Vary
5 Things About Obama’s New Climate Rules
New Climate-Change Regulations to Alter Industry
Rules Could Elevate Climate Change as 2016 Campaign Issue
In the absence of a plan to cut carbon-dioxide emissions in the U.S., the
president would have a “difficult row to hoe” as he seeks cooperation of
other world leaders, said Heather Zichal, a former Obama adviser on energy
and climate change.
“You’ve now got Obama going to Paris with a plan that has aggressive
emissions reductions,” she said. “Without that, I don’t see how the
United States would be credible.”
Republicans, though, have criticized both the emissions regulations and the
president’s push for an international pact. When the administration struck
a climate agreement with China in November, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky
and other Republicans said the deal made China do nothing until at least
2030 and that U.S. regulations would hurt America’s economy much sooner.
Mr. McConnell, the Senate majority leader, said Monday that the
administration’s rules wouldn’t meaningfully affect the global climate,
adding that “they could actually end up harming the environment by
outsourcing energy production to countries with poor environmental records
like India and China.”
Mr. Obama has been pointing toward Paris for months, framing the
negotiations as a historic opportunity to complete a pact with nearly 200
nations and reduce greenhouse-gas emissions world-wide. He has put the issue
front and center in his talks with world leaders, announcing the climate
deal with China, building consensus on climate action at the Group of Seven
summit in June and securing new commitments from Brazil earlier this summer.
A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., said Monday that
China is pursuing climate initiatives on its own and praised its
relationship with the U.S. on this issue. China has vowed that its carbon-
dioxide emissions would peak around 2030.
Whether Mr. Obama will win enough political support for his plan at home—as
well as legal rulings upholding the EPA rule—remains a question. Even if
the president prevails on the domestic front, that doesn’t guarantee
success internationally.
Norine Kennedy, vice president for environment and energy for the United
States Council for International Business, said the administration’s
ambition in reducing carbon emissions is commendable. But thorny issues,
such as agreeing on a plan to verify countries’ emissions cuts and finding
sources of money to aid developing countries in reducing emissions, still
must be resolved before Paris, she said.
Many Republicans and other opponents view Mr. Obama’s efforts on the
international agreement as executive overreach, and they have said they
would explore ways to warn other countries that the president might not be
able to deliver on his promises to slash emissions. Some also are pursuing
legal and legislative strategies aimed at derailing the EPA regulations,
which could prove problematic for meeting the U.S.’s international
commitments.
A group of 15 state attorneys general said minutes after Mr. Obama’s
announcement of the rule that they intend to file a lawsuit challenging it.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R., W.Va.) said a Senate committee would soon
take up legislation she has sponsored to delay the rule’s compliance
deadlines until all litigation is resolved and give governors the ability to
opt out of the plan if they determine the rule would crimp their economy or
reliability of the electric grid. The GOP-controlled House passed similar
legislation in June, though the prospects for Ms. Capito’s bill in the
Senate are unclear.
Mr. Obama hit back at critics Monday, casting them as cynical as he argued
that addressing climate change is a moral obligation, a public-health issue
and a matter of national security.
“There is such a thing as being too late when it comes to climate change,”
the president said Monday.
Experts also said a GOP win in the 2016 presidential election could call
into question the regulations’ long-term prospects and the U.S.’s Paris
commitments.
“This rule provides those abroad who have been skeptical of America’s
sincerity on climate more confidence that the U.S. will actually have a
chance of meeting its 2025 emissions commitment,” said Paul Bledsoe, a
former White House climate aide for then-President Bill Clinton. “But
concerns persist that a Republican president would reverse course.”
Write to Colleen McCain Nelson at [email protected]
/* */ and Amy Harder at
[email protected]
/* */ | T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | | f*******s
发帖数: 1100 | | C**********e
发帖数: 23303 | | j***i
发帖数: 4975 | 5 第一,是为了给下届政府造难题.
第二,是为了等等全世界,尤其是中国人民. | a*******m
发帖数: 14194 | 6 侯赛因的确像我党的内应，
民主党，共和党虽然牛逼，
还是玩不过我大共产党呀。
【在 j***i 的大作中提到】
: 第一,是为了给下届政府造难题.
: 第二,是为了等等全世界,尤其是中国人民.
| c****i
发帖数: 7933 | | l****5
发帖数: 5865 | | s*******1
发帖数: 16479 | | z***e
发帖数: 5600 | 10 Just rhetorics. Obama won't have enough support in the congress to do
anything on carbon...
【在 a*******m 的大作中提到】
: 真是学科学的人的耻辱呀，二氧化碳竟然成了污染物。
: 这帮子人也真是能忽悠，从全球变暖，忽悠到全球气候变化。
: 地球本来就是个不停在变动的系统，你prevent个屁呀？
: 美国要真是玩减少碳排放，也是有可能做到的，直接把烧煤的电厂，
: 全关了，换成烧天然气的电厂就差不多了。
: 但是，这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。
: 就跟你把上好的花梨木，当柴烧，生火做饭是一回事。
: 农民都不这么傻逼，都知道，最没用的料用来烧锅。
: 美国的一帮子人实在是太不像话了。
: 中国要减少污染，要环保，但是，烧天然气发电，拿花梨木烧锅的事，
| | | n****l
发帖数: 6652 | 11 民主党祸害美国，共和党祸害世界，如果明白了，你就不会奇怪了。
【在 a*******m 的大作中提到】
: 真是学科学的人的耻辱呀，二氧化碳竟然成了污染物。
: 这帮子人也真是能忽悠，从全球变暖，忽悠到全球气候变化。
: 地球本来就是个不停在变动的系统，你prevent个屁呀？
: 美国要真是玩减少碳排放，也是有可能做到的，直接把烧煤的电厂，
: 全关了，换成烧天然气的电厂就差不多了。
: 但是，这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。
: 就跟你把上好的花梨木，当柴烧，生火做饭是一回事。
: 农民都不这么傻逼，都知道，最没用的料用来烧锅。
: 美国的一帮子人实在是太不像话了。
: 中国要减少污染，要环保，但是，烧天然气发电，拿花梨木烧锅的事，
| l*******g
发帖数: 27064 | 12 也不算祸害世界吧,就是米尤借机插管吸血而已
【在 n****l 的大作中提到】
: 民主党祸害美国，共和党祸害世界，如果明白了，你就不会奇怪了。
| d********t
发帖数: 9628 | 13 扯淡吧，天然气多得用不掉，价格一直跌。
【在 a*******m 的大作中提到】
: 真是学科学的人的耻辱呀，二氧化碳竟然成了污染物。
: 这帮子人也真是能忽悠，从全球变暖，忽悠到全球气候变化。
: 地球本来就是个不停在变动的系统，你prevent个屁呀？
: 美国要真是玩减少碳排放，也是有可能做到的，直接把烧煤的电厂，
: 全关了，换成烧天然气的电厂就差不多了。
: 但是，这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。
: 就跟你把上好的花梨木，当柴烧，生火做饭是一回事。
: 农民都不这么傻逼，都知道，最没用的料用来烧锅。
: 美国的一帮子人实在是太不像话了。
: 中国要减少污染，要环保，但是，烧天然气发电，拿花梨木烧锅的事，
| h***a
发帖数: 2720 | | d****e
发帖数: 839 | 15 是这样的吗？ 哈哈
【在 a*******m 的大作中提到】
: 侯赛因的确像我党的内应，
: 民主党，共和党虽然牛逼，
: 还是玩不过我大共产党呀。
| S******4
发帖数: 2865 | 16 "这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。"
是呀，这么宝贵的东西发电多浪费啊，所以要继续用煤来发电，反正煤是用之不竭的，
而且又可以喷出大量的污染物，有毒气体啊，大家都喜欢！Oh yeah！
Are you even listening to yourself?
煞笔。 | h***0
发帖数: 1184 | 17
lz文科生，别跟他一般见识。总觉得自己比谁都牛逼，那为什么人家奥巴马当总统了，
他还在地下室里喷人
【在 S******4 的大作中提到】
: "这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。"
: 是呀，这么宝贵的东西发电多浪费啊，所以要继续用煤来发电，反正煤是用之不竭的，
: 而且又可以喷出大量的污染物，有毒气体啊，大家都喜欢！Oh yeah！
: Are you even listening to yourself?
: 煞笔。
| N*******M
发帖数: 3963 | 18 把人类从地球上拿掉，从此就不会有全球变暖，全球气候变化这些垃圾了
【在 a*******m 的大作中提到】
: 真是学科学的人的耻辱呀，二氧化碳竟然成了污染物。
: 这帮子人也真是能忽悠，从全球变暖，忽悠到全球气候变化。
: 地球本来就是个不停在变动的系统，你prevent个屁呀？
: 美国要真是玩减少碳排放，也是有可能做到的，直接把烧煤的电厂，
: 全关了，换成烧天然气的电厂就差不多了。
: 但是，这么宝贵的，便于使用的天然气，就拿来烧掉发电，实在是太暴殄天物了。
: 就跟你把上好的花梨木，当柴烧，生火做饭是一回事。
: 农民都不这么傻逼，都知道，最没用的料用来烧锅。
: 美国的一帮子人实在是太不像话了。
: 中国要减少污染，要环保，但是，烧天然气发电，拿花梨木烧锅的事，
| a*****e
发帖数: 2503 | |
|
