b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 1 http://www.caochangqing.com/big5/newsdisp.php?News_ID=3583
摘译】我傾向相信柴玲的證詞，儘管我沒有檢驗遠志明一方的說法（因為找不到）。如
果她關于遠的證詞是真實的，不僅是強姦的那部分，而是不悔改的那部分，那就說明遠
這件事是罕見的強暴者成為牧師的例子。遠只是證實了我的看法，為什麼他的布道是有
問題的（不僅是那種“每個人都犯錯”的觀點，更是那種刻意地把罪合理化的做法）。
I am inclined to believe Chai Ling’s testimony over Yuan’s (even though I
have not examined Yuan’s side of his story, since I cannot find one). And
if what she testified about Yuan was true, not the rape part but the
unrepentant part, then though Yuan would have been the rare case of a rapist
turned pastor, Yuan has merely proven my points as to why his ministry is
problematic (Not in a "everyone makes mistakes" way, but more of a "
intentionally justifying sins" way).
【全文见：http://nycphantom.com/journal/?p=5814】
2015-01-03
http://www.caochangqing.com （轉載請指明出處） |
