d******8 发帖数: 3017 | 1 今天的判决,明显对我们亚裔,学习成绩优秀的亚裔来说,是个好消息 |
s*******8 发帖数: 12734 | 2 贴了,沉了
【在 d******8 的大作中提到】 : 今天的判决,明显对我们亚裔,学习成绩优秀的亚裔来说,是个好消息
|
C********g 发帖数: 1548 | 3 It is both a good news and a bad one. |
c******t 发帖数: 2478 | 4 趋势是好的,但现状仍然不容乐观。这次判决最高院的立场是特权法案(AA)由各州自
己选民说了算。最高院对AA本身的态度是允许AA,但是不强制AA。也就是说告AA违宪的
路基本是堵死了。
【在 d******8 的大作中提到】 : 今天的判决,明显对我们亚裔,学习成绩优秀的亚裔来说,是个好消息
|
c**********N 发帖数: 1273 | 5 我关心,详细讲讲。这是大事。
【在 d******8 的大作中提到】 : 今天的判决,明显对我们亚裔,学习成绩优秀的亚裔来说,是个好消息
|
T*R 发帖数: 36302 | 6 我觉得还是好事。
因为从人口改变看,如果这是联邦层面的,那基本全面AA是迟早的,甚至会进入一定规
模以上的私人企业。
但是黑墨在一些州并没有优势。这样有些州就可能例外。
总得来说,加州AA是迟早的事。
这个没办法,AA是普适准则,从老毛让贫下中农孩子上大学,到印度给低种姓配额上大
学,到美国的AA,都是统治阶级维稳的必然举措。 |
S**C 发帖数: 2964 | 7 SCOUS decisions are often very narrow and limited, which is a good thing. In
this particular case, the SCOUS does not need/want/ready to rule on the
constitutionality of AA.
There is no majority consensus among the judges, and they will likely punt
the ball as much as they could in the near future, just like in the Fisher v
. University of Texas case. Now The Fifth Circuit need to apply strict
scrutiny on the case, and the case will for sure be back to SCOUS in a few
years, and I expect them to be force to rule one way or another in this
decade, hopefully for the better.
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation
where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content
of their character."
"The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop
discriminating on the basis of race."
【在 c******t 的大作中提到】 : 趋势是好的,但现状仍然不容乐观。这次判决最高院的立场是特权法案(AA)由各州自 : 己选民说了算。最高院对AA本身的态度是允许AA,但是不强制AA。也就是说告AA违宪的 : 路基本是堵死了。
|