h******t 发帖数: 872 | |
l*********u 发帖数: 19053 | 2 不奏是:一个正长身体的楞头青,挑逗一个哭天嚎地的没名份妓女,妓女死命拉扯一个
力不从心还嘴硬的垂垂老头嘛 :)
【在 h******t 的大作中提到】 : This person has lots of insider information about relations among these : nations. He also aware the delicate relationship between DoD, State : department, DC and MI in Japan. worth to read. : http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenharner/ : http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenharner/2013/11/12/u-s-japan- : http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenharner/2013/11/23/as-china-a : http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenharner/2013/12/02/vp-biden-i
|
c*******n 发帖数: 2764 | 3 说的好 哈哈
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】 : 不奏是:一个正长身体的楞头青,挑逗一个哭天嚎地的没名份妓女,妓女死命拉扯一个 : 力不从心还嘴硬的垂垂老头嘛 :)
|
h******t 发帖数: 872 | 4 这里告诉大家为什么会有现在的中日争夺。 美国的军事工业共同体和Hilary之流是背
后的麻烦制造人。 日本右翼是配合并争取自己的利益。 DC 有中国的同情者, 他们和
军工共同体 DoD 在决定对华政策上是不全一致。 事态的发展有不确定性。 三年后,
如果Hilary上台, 麻烦会更大。 应当有些准备 |
r**s 发帖数: 129 | |
k******a 发帖数: 2436 | 6 The core interests of US in East Asia is to maintain the stability of the
largest trade partners. This results in US trying to balance all parties and
avoid conflicts. The more US "pivot" in East Asia, the more it recognizes
the overwhelming importance of China that is truly worthy of "pivoting".
In essence, the reality inevitably points to a China-US strategic alliance
in the long term without either sides mentioning it explicitly in the short
term. |