m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 1 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/world/asia/air-pollution-link
Air Pollution Linked to 1.2 Million Premature Deaths in China
BEIJING — Outdoor air pollution contributed to 1.2 million premature
deaths in China in 2010, nearly 40 percent of the global total, according to
a new summary of data from a scientific study on leading causes of death
worldwide.
Figured another way, the researchers said, China’s toll from pollution was
the loss of 25 million healthy years of life from the population.
The data on which the analysis is based was first presented in the ambitious
2010 Global Burden of Disease Study, which was published in December in The
Lancet, a British medical journal. The authors decided to break out numbers
for specific countries and present the findings at international
conferences. The China statistics were offered at a forum in Beijing on
Sunday.
“We have been rolling out the India- and China-specific numbers, as they
speak more directly to national leaders than regional numbers,” said Robert
O’Keefe, the vice president of Health Effects Institute, a research
organization that is helping to present the study. The organization is
partly financed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the
global motor vehicle industry.
What the researchers called “ambient particulate matter pollution” was the
fourth leading risk factor for deaths in China in 2010, behind dietary
risks, high blood pressure and smoking. Air pollution ranked seventh on the
worldwide list of risk factors, contributing to 3.2 million deaths in 2010.
By comparison with China, India, which also has densely populated cities
grappling with similar levels of pollution, had 620,000 premature deaths in
2010 because of outdoor air pollution, the study found. That was deemed to
be the sixth most common killer in South Asia.
The study was led by an institute at the University of Washington and
several partner universities and institutions, including the World Health
Organization.
Calculations of premature deaths because of outdoor air pollution are
politically threatening in the eyes of some Chinese officials. According to
news reports, Chinese officials cut out sections of a 2007 report called “
Cost of Pollution in China” that discussed premature deaths. The report’s
authors had concluded that 350,000 to 400,000 people die prematurely in
China each year because of outdoor air pollution. The study was done by the
World Bank in cooperation with the Chinese State Environmental Protection
Administration, the precursor to the Ministry of Environmental Protection.
There have been other estimates of premature deaths because of air pollution
. In 2011, the World Health Organization estimated that there were 1.3
million premature deaths in cities worldwide because of outdoor air
pollution.
Last month, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, based
in Paris, warned that “urban air pollution is set to become the top
environmental cause of mortality worldwide by 2050, ahead of dirty water and
lack of sanitation.” It estimated that up to 3.6 million people could end
up dying prematurely from air pollution each year, mostly in China and India.
There has been growing outrage in Chinese cities over what many say are
untenable levels of air pollution. Cities across northern China hit record
levels in January. Because of that, official Chinese newspapers ran front-
page articles on the surge, despite earlier limits on such discussion by
propaganda officials. In February, the State Council, China’s cabinet,
announced a timeline for the introduction of new fuel standards, but state-
owned oil and power companies are known to block or ignore environmental
policies to save on costs.
A study released on Thursday said the growth rate of disclosure of pollution
information in 113 Chinese cities had slowed. The groups doing the study,
the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, based in Beijing, and the
Natural Resources Defense Council, based in Washington, said that “faced
with the current situation of severe air, water and soil pollution, we must
make changes to pollution source information disclosure so that information
is no longer patchy, out of date and difficult to obtain.”
Chinese officials have made some progress in disclosing crucial air
pollution statistics. Official news reports have said 74 cities are now
required to release data on levels of particulate matter 2.5 micrometers in
diameter or smaller, which penetrate the body’s tissues most deeply. For
years, Chinese officials had been collecting the data but refusing to
release it, until they came under pressure from Chinese who saw that the
United States Embassy in Beijing was measuring the levels hourly and posting
the data in a Twitter feed, @BeijingAir.
Last week, an official Chinese news report said the cost of environmental
degradation in China was about $230 billion in 2010, or 3.5 percent of the
nation’s gross domestic product. The estimate, said to be partial, came
from a research institute under the Ministry of Environmental Protection,
and was three times the amount in 2004, in local currency terms. It was
unclear to what extent those numbers took into account the costs of health
care and premature deaths because of pollution. |
g********d
发帖数: 641 | 2 红色的旗帜上沾满了鲜血。
to
was
ambitious
The
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/world/asia/air-pollution-link
: Air Pollution Linked to 1.2 Million Premature Deaths in China
: BEIJING — Outdoor air pollution contributed to 1.2 million premature
: deaths in China in 2010, nearly 40 percent of the global total, according to
: a new summary of data from a scientific study on leading causes of death
: worldwide.
: Figured another way, the researchers said, China’s toll from pollution was
: the loss of 25 million healthy years of life from the population.
: The data on which the analysis is based was first presented in the ambitious
: 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study, which was published in December in The
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 3 注意了，本文标题有误。仅仅空气污染就造成中国每年一百二十万例早死。食物和饮用
水污染造成的死亡数目还得另算。
to
was
ambitious
The
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/world/asia/air-pollution-link
: Air Pollution Linked to 1.2 Million Premature Deaths in China
: BEIJING — Outdoor air pollution contributed to 1.2 million premature
: deaths in China in 2010, nearly 40 percent of the global total, according to
: a new summary of data from a scientific study on leading causes of death
: worldwide.
: Figured another way, the researchers said, China’s toll from pollution was
: the loss of 25 million healthy years of life from the population.
: The data on which the analysis is based was first presented in the ambitious
: 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study, which was published in December in The
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 4 柳叶刀是个啥烂杂志？影响因子几何？为何如此恶毒攻击中国？
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 注意了，本文标题有误。仅仅空气污染就造成中国每年一百二十万例早死。食物和饮用
: 水污染造成的死亡数目还得另算。
:
: to
: was
: ambitious
: The
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 5 小将们还在装鸵鸟，继续装作没有读到此文。
to
was
ambitious
The
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/world/asia/air-pollution-link
: Air Pollution Linked to 1.2 Million Premature Deaths in China
: BEIJING — Outdoor air pollution contributed to 1.2 million premature
: deaths in China in 2010, nearly 40 percent of the global total, according to
: a new summary of data from a scientific study on leading causes of death
: worldwide.
: Figured another way, the researchers said, China’s toll from pollution was
: the loss of 25 million healthy years of life from the population.
: The data on which the analysis is based was first presented in the ambitious
: 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study, which was published in December in The
|
j*********n
发帖数: 4116 | 6 插管吸血、倒贴嫖资的外F妓院经济！这下好了吧，洋大人玩爽了还指责：看，我留了
一堆杨梅大疮在你们那里。
邓产党，OK!
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.8
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 小将们还在装鸵鸟，继续装作没有读到此文。
:
: to
: was
: ambitious
: The
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 7 加上毒食物和毒水，每年大概差不多五百万中国人被毒死。没死的人也被毒成东
亚病夫了。小将们还在意淫啥大国崛起，可笑不可笑。
【在 j*********n 的大作中提到】
: 插管吸血、倒贴嫖资的外F妓院经济！这下好了吧，洋大人玩爽了还指责：看，我留了
: 一堆杨梅大疮在你们那里。
: 邓产党，OK!
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.8
|
t***o
发帖数: 4265 | 8 真搞不懂你这种ID干什么要到买买提上来混？混但不发声也罢了。小将老将都分不清楚
，还叫嚷“小将们还在装鸵鸟，继续装作没有读到此文”。老将都是些什么角色？好蛋
，thread123，温JB，胡JB，搞清楚了吗？他们才会继续装作没有读到此文。
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 小将们还在装鸵鸟，继续装作没有读到此文。
:
: to
: was
: ambitious
: The
|
m***n
发帖数: 12188 | |
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 10 我上不上买买提，发不发声，干你妈你姐你老婆的事了？你算啥东西，敢跟我这样讲话
？被中国毒空气毒水毒食品毒得智障了吧？五毛，滚回你的“毒中国”去。
【在 t***o 的大作中提到】
: 真搞不懂你这种ID干什么要到买买提上来混？混但不发声也罢了。小将老将都分不清楚
: ，还叫嚷“小将们还在装鸵鸟，继续装作没有读到此文”。老将都是些什么角色？好蛋
: ，thread123，温JB，胡JB，搞清楚了吗？他们才会继续装作没有读到此文。
|
|
|
L*********2
发帖数: 10195 | 11 小case,千分之一都不到摸，小酱家人轮到的可能性不大，敬请我党继续竭中华之物力
，结世界之欢心。 |
c******k
发帖数: 8998 | 12 2011年全中国死亡人口也才960万，难道一半多都是被毒死的？
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 加上毒食物和毒水，每年大概差不多五百万中国人被毒死。没死的人也被毒成东
: 亚病夫了。小将们还在意淫啥大国崛起，可笑不可笑。
|
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 13 共产主义的纲领就是要灭绝中华汉族
被空气毒死比进毒气室要好多了，所以大家要庆幸没有生在纳粹德国。 |
L*********2
发帖数: 10195 | 14 又一优越性，我们要感谢党，感谢政府！
【在 M*****n 的大作中提到】
: 共产主义的纲领就是要灭绝中华汉族
: 被空气毒死比进毒气室要好多了，所以大家要庆幸没有生在纳粹德国。
|
s***5
发帖数: 203 | 15 欧美现在唯一的希望就是中国闹内乱。跟轮子一样空口白牙捏造数据。 |
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 16 吸烟的人平均减寿9－10年。中国的污染三毒齐下，比吸烟厉害多了。中国人在不远的
将来平均减寿二十年不稀奇。这不大规模的污染才刚开始呢。不远的将来中国必然要出
现历史性的癌症高峰。
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 2011年全中国死亡人口也才960万，难道一半多都是被毒死的？
|
P****i
发帖数: 12972 | 17 中国的life expectancy这10年一直在增长和这个数据矛盾
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 吸烟的人平均减寿9－10年。中国的污染三毒齐下，比吸烟厉害多了。中国人在不远的
: 将来平均减寿二十年不稀奇。这不大规模的污染才刚开始呢。不远的将来中国必然要出
: 现历史性的癌症高峰。
|
s***5
发帖数: 203 | 18 你说比吸烟厉害就厉害，你代表真理？
中国环境需要治理，但是轮不到欧美别有用心来说三道四，收买民心！
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 吸烟的人平均减寿9－10年。中国的污染三毒齐下，比吸烟厉害多了。中国人在不远的
: 将来平均减寿二十年不稀奇。这不大规模的污染才刚开始呢。不远的将来中国必然要出
: 现历史性的癌症高峰。
|
s***5
发帖数: 203 | 19 美国的专基因大豆造成几百万早死，但是人家就不会提这个 |
P****i
发帖数: 12972 | 20 这个早死是怎么统计出来的？
【在 s***5 的大作中提到】
: 美国的专基因大豆造成几百万早死，但是人家就不会提这个
|
|
|
s***5
发帖数: 203 | 21 想想现在为什么死猪成灾？与以前不同的是，现在猪吃的都是转基因大豆和玉米饲料
我这个有动物实验，比欧美推中国污染造数据靠谱多了
【在 P****i 的大作中提到】
: 这个早死是怎么统计出来的？
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 22 你自己嘴里吐出来的词正好适用于你全家的女性。哈哈！SB活该！ |
c******k
发帖数: 8998 | 23 看你也是个搞生物的，狠批之前最好还是仔细读一下全文，不要随便看个NYT记者瞎写
的就下结论。就算在你贴的NYT稿子里面，也是说“1.2 million were in east Asia
and China, and 712,000 in south Asia, including India.”
就算这个包括了整个东亚的数据，我在lancet原文中也没找到。
这个稿子里面提到的文章在此：http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2812%2961766-8/fulltext
我搜索了全文，没有一处特别提到中国的死亡数据，只有分地区的统计。
to
was
ambitious
The
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/world/asia/air-pollution-link
: Air Pollution Linked to 1.2 Million Premature Deaths in China
: BEIJING — Outdoor air pollution contributed to 1.2 million premature
: deaths in China in 2010, nearly 40 percent of the global total, according to
: a new summary of data from a scientific study on leading causes of death
: worldwide.
: Figured another way, the researchers said, China’s toll from pollution was
: the loss of 25 million healthy years of life from the population.
: The data on which the analysis is based was first presented in the ambitious
: 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study, which was published in December in The
|
c******k
发帖数: 8998 | 24 中国的污染的确很严重，没人否认，可以批的地方多得很。
但是这不足以证明这个数据就是正确的。你也搞生物的，这点科学精神总应该有吧。
你最起码读读原文，看看这个数据是不是村子，是不是符合逻辑。
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 吸烟的人平均减寿9－10年。中国的污染三毒齐下，比吸烟厉害多了。中国人在不远的
: 将来平均减寿二十年不稀奇。这不大规模的污染才刚开始呢。不远的将来中国必然要出
: 现历史性的癌症高峰。
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 25 你是土博吧？读了几轮千老了？最近发PLOS ONE了没有？
小将的典型学术历程：土博 ＋ 数轮千老 ＋ PLOS ONE。 试问小将是如何炼成的？苦
逼生活来造就。
正文虽然只讨论了东亚。可是东亚有几个国家？日本的数据另有文章被引用了。两个朝
鲜才多少人口？最重要的是，NYT的稿子里开门见山，非常明确的指出了中国数据的来
源。你难道没读到？是不是发PLOS ONE都是你老板出的IDEA写的MANUSCRIPT？兄弟，实
在不行
，回国去当个师资博士后也比在网上当卢瑟尔小将强吧。
The authors decided to break out numbers
for specific countries and present the findings at international
conferences. The China statistics were offered at a forum in Beijing on
Sunday.
"We have been rolling out the India- and China-specific numbers, as they
speak more directly to national leaders than regional numbers,” said Robert
O’Keefe, the vice president of Health Effects Institute, a research
organization that is helping to present the study."
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 看你也是个搞生物的，狠批之前最好还是仔细读一下全文，不要随便看个NYT记者瞎写
: 的就下结论。就算在你贴的NYT稿子里面，也是说“1.2 million were in east Asia
: and China, and 712,000 in south Asia, including India.”
: 就算这个包括了整个东亚的数据，我在lancet原文中也没找到。
: 这个稿子里面提到的文章在此：http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2812%2961766-8/fulltext
: 我搜索了全文，没有一处特别提到中国的死亡数据，只有分地区的统计。
:
: to
: was
: ambitious
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 26 你是土博吧？读了几轮千老了？最近发PLOS ONE了没有？
小将的典型学术历程：土博 ＋ 数轮千老 ＋ PLOS ONE。 试问小将是如何炼成的？苦
逼生活来造就。
正文虽然只讨论了东亚。可是东亚有几个国家？日本的数据另有文章被引用了。两个朝
鲜才多少人口？最重要的是，NYT的稿子里开门见山，非常明确的指出了中国数据的来
源。你难道没读到？是不是发PLOS ONE都是你老板出的IDEA写的MANUSCRIPT？兄弟，实
在不行
，回国去当个师资博士后也比在网上当卢瑟尔小将强吧。
The authors decided to break out numbers
for specific countries and present the findings at international
conferences. The China statistics were offered at a forum in Beijing on
Sunday.
"We have been rolling out the India- and China-specific numbers, as they
speak more directly to national leaders than regional numbers,” said Robert
O’Keefe, the vice president of Health Effects Institute, a research
organization that is helping to present the study."
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 中国的污染的确很严重，没人否认，可以批的地方多得很。
: 但是这不足以证明这个数据就是正确的。你也搞生物的，这点科学精神总应该有吧。
: 你最起码读读原文，看看这个数据是不是村子，是不是符合逻辑。
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 27 你不象生物千老，应该是文科傻妞。
【在 s***5 的大作中提到】
: 想想现在为什么死猪成灾？与以前不同的是，现在猪吃的都是转基因大豆和玉米饲料
: 我这个有动物实验，比欧美推中国污染造数据靠谱多了
|
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 28 小将们被骂得双股战栗，汗不敢出。 唯一的指望是盼望此帖赶快沉下去。哈哈哈。
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 你是土博吧？读了几轮千老了？最近发PLOS ONE了没有？
: 小将的典型学术历程：土博 ＋ 数轮千老 ＋ PLOS ONE。 试问小将是如何炼成的？苦
: 逼生活来造就。
: 正文虽然只讨论了东亚。可是东亚有几个国家？日本的数据另有文章被引用了。两个朝
: 鲜才多少人口？最重要的是，NYT的稿子里开门见山，非常明确的指出了中国数据的来
: 源。你难道没读到？是不是发PLOS ONE都是你老板出的IDEA写的MANUSCRIPT？兄弟，实
: 在不行
: ，回国去当个师资博士后也比在网上当卢瑟尔小将强吧。
: The authors decided to break out numbers
: for specific countries and present the findings at international
|
f**x
发帖数: 4325 | 29 还行，比不上当年伦敦污染。
蹲在山脚下和已经爬上山顶的人都可以躺着享受，既然选择了爬山又没爬到顶，就得忍。
如果真的想要自然生活，搬到西藏去就行了，option存在。 |
m*********n
发帖数: 91 | 30 怎末可以比呢，当年伦敦污染比现在中国的污染严重一万倍。什末，管我要数据？我可
没有。信不信随你便。我就耍赖，就不给出数据，你又能把我怎末样？
忍。
【在 f**x 的大作中提到】
: 还行，比不上当年伦敦污染。
: 蹲在山脚下和已经爬上山顶的人都可以躺着享受，既然选择了爬山又没爬到顶，就得忍。
: 如果真的想要自然生活，搬到西藏去就行了，option存在。
|
