G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 1 Human are selfish. This kind of selfishness will make a person
vote for himself for ever.
If Republic party have a better plan for the U.S., can a democrat
change his or her mind to vote for his or her opponent party?
have Never heard of that.
Is there a republic president nominee's wife who votes for
democrat party?
have never heard of that.
our human's selfishness defintely hinders the freedom and democracy
of the voting system. Makes it very weak and ineffient actually.
random head and tail by coin flipping might choose the best candidate
for our United States instead. |
w******t
发帖数: 16937 | 2 投票是为了平衡。
Human are selfish. This kind of selfishness will make a personvote for
himself for ever.........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.56
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: Human are selfish. This kind of selfishness will make a person
: vote for himself for ever.
: If Republic party have a better plan for the U.S., can a democrat
: change his or her mind to vote for his or her opponent party?
: have Never heard of that.
: Is there a republic president nominee's wife who votes for
: democrat party?
: have never heard of that.
: our human's selfishness defintely hinders the freedom and democracy
: of the voting system. Makes it very weak and ineffient actually.
|
n****t
发帖数: 729 | 3 如果民主党议员知道自己选区的选民支持共和党提出的议案，如果自己投票反对可能威
胁到自己的政治前途时，他是会考虑投票支持共和党的。这依然是你所说的“vote for
himself for ever”。人不需要改变自私的天性。现代民主制度的设计利用了人的自
私本性，至于能不能设计得更好一点，则是另外一个问题了。
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: Human are selfish. This kind of selfishness will make a person
: vote for himself for ever.
: If Republic party have a better plan for the U.S., can a democrat
: change his or her mind to vote for his or her opponent party?
: have Never heard of that.
: Is there a republic president nominee's wife who votes for
: democrat party?
: have never heard of that.
: our human's selfishness defintely hinders the freedom and democracy
: of the voting system. Makes it very weak and ineffient actually.
|
a*********0
发帖数: 2727 | |
