s********n 发帖数: 26222 | |
p******u 发帖数: 14642 | 2 再加个巴格达地检特搜部?
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 有何狼子野心啊,各位分析一下。
|
s********n 发帖数: 26222 | 3 随时可以把不听话的伊拉克总统府给端了?
【在 p******u 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 再加个巴格达地检特搜部?
|
x******g 发帖数: 33885 | |
s********n 发帖数: 26222 | 5 还没最后确定吧,这个,应该还在谈判中吧。
【在 x******g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 好像人家伊拉克拒绝了。 : 所以只好打道回府。
|
d***u 发帖数: 1310 | 6 党中央出现两种声音了?
我听说是"650个非战斗人员".
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 有何狼子野心啊,各位分析一下。
|
s********n 发帖数: 26222 | 7 在撤军“大限”临近之际,美伊一直在就12月31日后的驻军问题进行谈判,但围绕法律
豁免权议题僵持不下。五角大楼希望3000至5000美军能以教官的身份继续留下来,并享
有法律豁免权,但伊拉克坚持“留守”美军不应享有法律豁免权。
在21日的讲话中,奥巴马未对今后美国在伊拉克的驻军问题做出具体说明,只称建
设一个稳定、安全、自主的伊拉克符合美国利益,因此年底撤回全部美军后,“美国将
继续讨论如何帮助伊拉克训练和装备它的武装力量”。
2003年3月美国开打伊拉克战争,迄今共有4400名美军阵亡。2010年8月,在撤走作
战部队之际,奥巴马宣布伊拉克战争结束,但仍将约5.6万名美军留在伊拉克。据五角
大楼统计,现阶段驻伊美军人数减至3.9万人,如果全部撤离,还需把上百万件武器装
备处理完毕。(完)
【在 d***u 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 党中央出现两种声音了? : 我听说是"650个非战斗人员".
|
x****o 发帖数: 29677 | |
b*******k 发帖数: 16989 | 9 就是。
只要伊拉克的石油还在用美元交易,就没必要驻军浪费纳税人的钱财
【在 x****o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 赶紧撤军吧,在伊拉克扔钱那是呼呼的,养不起了
|
r*******3 发帖数: 10886 | 10 黑水包括在内不?
当地GLA可以现场转业复员嘛 |
x******g 发帖数: 33885 | 11 The Iraqi people overwhelming want to see an end to the occupation of their
country, which has wrought so much devastation and suffering since 2003.
Some in the Iraqi leadership have been steadfast in opposing an indefinite
US presence, like Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi, who in August said a
continued American military presence in Iraq would be “a problem, not a
solution.” The influential Shiite cleric-turned Iraqi politician Moqtadr al
-Sadr has warned again and again that a US presence beyond the deadline
would mean increased violence and has tried to find alternatives to
remaining US troops.
In fact, the current scheduled withdrawal date that Obama has now pledged to
adhere to was also the result of firm Iraqi rejection of US imperialism.
Back in 2007 Bush administration had drafted the first Status of Forces
Agreement (SOFA) which detailed a prolonged and continued US troop presence
in Iraq with no specified limits and called for “facilitating and
encouraging the flow of foreign investments to Iraq, especially American
investments” and for US forces to work indefinitely to “deter foreign
aggression against Iraq.” This was overly egregious for Iraqis and couldn’
t pass muster in Iraqi politics, thus the 2008 SOFA demanding full pullout
in December 2011.
Troublingly, this announcement and transition into a so-called new
relationship with Iraq has failed to introduce any sort of accountability
for the vast amount of crimes the US and the Bush administration committed
in its execution of the Iraq war. Clear signs of tampering with evidence and
being disingenuous about Iraq’s Saddam Hussein should be prosecutable
offenses, along with the highest crime in international law, namely a war of
aggression (one without the justification of self-defense). Others
including battlefield crimes and Abu Ghraib will continue to be swept into
the dustbin of history by the President soon to be credited with ending the
Iraq War.
The Obama administration has failed in their attempt to continue the US
occupation of Iraq, conceding to pulling out over 40,000 remaining US combat
forces by December. But given the current and foreseeable US relationship
with Iraq, the future of the embattled country appears likely to fall into
the US domain of hegemonic influence and into a reliable client state. |