s***3
发帖数: 793 | 1 I Can’t Understand It: Questions Put to Anti-China Advocates
Fan Shouyi, CFAU, China
I can’t understand why in a country where a great president warned his
people that “a house divided against itself cannot stand,” there are a
handful of people who won’t feel happy until they succeed in bringing other
countries down?
I can’t understand why in a country where black people were delivered from
the yoke of slavery, there are some people who give their support to Dalai
Lama, the spiritual leader in exile, who is a representative of feudalistic
serfdom?
I can’t understand why in the country of Martin Luther King, the tradition
of resorting to non-violent means for winning their rights is forgotten, but
a handful of people make a big noise and side with Tibetans for
independence who are treating even their own kind equally brutally. There is
a saying in your language, which goes: “A man is judged by the company he
keeps,” so do you feel not ashamed when some of you are in the company of
such a spiritual leader and such ruthless rioters?
I can’t understand why some people who know nothing about the ABC of
Tibetan history, say categorically that Tibet is an independent state?
I can’t understand why some people who have not been to Tibet, and seen for
them the concord between Tibetans, Hans and other ethnic groups, refuse to
recognize the fact that progress and achievements have been made in Tibet,
and it is beginning to prosper?
I can’t understand why some people who don’t make any serious
investigation of what the central government has done for the well being of
the Tibetan people and how much input it has made in terms of human,
material and financial resources dismissed all that has been done by the
central government as being nothing?
I can’t understand why while people of the Dalai clique have been
disrupting the Olympic torch relay along the route, like clowns gone wild—
some of them are actually cross-border professional trouble-makers, some
people are gloating over it and giving covert assistance?
I can’t understand why members of the parliament of a group of nations
behave so excitedly at the moment when they voted for boycotting the
upcoming Olympic Games? Your anti-China chorus is not even veiled? Is it not
an act of folly on your part to hijack your people and your sportspersons?
What does it have to do with us if you refuse to come to Beijing to cheer
for your athletes and boost their morale?
I can’t understand why some people are bent on putting the blame on China
for the tragic consequences of domestic clash of interests between the two
parts of the Sudan? And also tie it with the boycott of the Olympic Games to
be held in 2008?
I can’t understand why some of your media are playing footage of police
arresting rioters in .
in other countries that happened some time before with captions or comments
saying without remorse that it is happening in Lhasa?
Why are you using such cooked-up, deceptive news items to hoodwink the world
? Abraham Lincoln put it well: “You can fool all the people some of the
time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the
people all the time.” The behavior of your media shall be recorded as a
classic case study in the history of Western media. Thoughtful students will
write their theses on this topic. One anchorperson wrapped up his
commentary with an insult against 1.3 billion Chinese people, and has not
apologized even now. Such a person as he is who shows no respect to others
has no right to talk about human rights issues.
I can’t understand why while it is your leaders and tycoons who persuaded
China into embracing your idea of globalization, and has founded
transnational companies in China and taken away a lion’s share of profits
you have generated in China, yet you blame China for climatic changes in the
world for the past 200 years?
I can’t understand why your weapons can be sold to whomever you want to,
but when China sells some conventional weapons you make a big fuss and try
hard to obstruct?
I can’t understand why some toys are not up to standard because of faulty
designs of your manufacturers, yet you make a big publicity of the quality
of China-made products?
I can’t understand why while every country has its own troubles, decision-
makers of your country are using your taxpayers’ money to shatter other
countries to smithereens to fatten the purses of your weapon manufacturers?
When we were still living in the decadent feudal society, China’s doors
were forced open by gunboats of Western powers; cases of concessions of land
and compensations followed one another; how much wealth had western powers
plundered from China? Who can give us the exact figures? Now what wealth and
resources you are “taking away” is obtained by peaceful means of
globalization. The Chinese people who had been poor for so long and their
leaders have finally realized that the Western way of life which we once
repudiated as being bourgeois is basically the same as the goals we are
striving to attain.
We are enjoying a happy life in such way of living is bringing us but at
greater costs than warranted. Should we not enjoy a happy life such as you
have been enjoying for so long? Should we not keep up with the Jones? We
also want to have very tall buildings, very long bridges, very large ships,
and we also want to fly to the Moon, to Mars. We live on the same planet,
but do you feel so worried about your neighbor whose life is getting better?
Haven’t you reaped more profits in the course of our enjoying the bliss of
such life and thereby you become happier than ever before?
I really can’t understand why some of you hate China so much and make
things so difficult for us? But there is one thing that I firmly believe:
China is getting stronger, and our life is getting better. If you are not
happy to see China rise, well and good, don’t engage us, don’t lead your
trade delegations to Beijing and go back home with orders worth billions of
dollars, don’t take away the cash which the Chinese people have earned with
sweat and toil. You will not get any benefits by creating chaos in China.
We Chinese have the wisdom to adjust our national policies, and we will make
a good job of it all the same.
===============
Thanks for reading. BTW, 'prime minister' of 22,000 separatists + 12,000
more wants to take on the gov't of 1.3 billion Chinese + a few million in
Chinese diaspora? Gimme a break! |
w********l
发帖数: 11447 | |
w********l
发帖数: 11447 | 3 google纯粹是个婊子。
盖茨的微软帝国到底还是气质的多。google就是个暴发户。 |
S*********4
发帖数: 5125 | |
j*****p
发帖数: 24000 | |
s****r
发帖数: 5546 | 6 古狗难得的成为了一个比狗剩还evil的公司
【在 w********l 的大作中提到】
: google纯粹是个婊子。
: 盖茨的微软帝国到底还是气质的多。google就是个暴发户。
|
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 7 wow!! 收藏了
other
from
feudalistic
【在 s***3 的大作中提到】
: I Can’t Understand It: Questions Put to Anti-China Advocates
: Fan Shouyi, CFAU, China
: I can’t understand why in a country where a great president warned his
: people that “a house divided against itself cannot stand,” there are a
: handful of people who won’t feel happy until they succeed in bringing other
: countries down?
: I can’t understand why in a country where black people were delivered from
: the yoke of slavery, there are some people who give their support to Dalai
: Lama, the spiritual leader in exile, who is a representative of feudalistic
: serfdom?
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 8 你还收藏？我怎么觉得这英语写的特别特别怪啊？好象文法不通似的。
有英文高手评价下吗？
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: wow!! 收藏了
:
: other
: from
: feudalistic
|
p**********d
发帖数: 7918 | 9 很多文法錯誤，但是這不是重要的。文章是熱血青年的調調，相當於高一的智商。
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 你还收藏？我怎么觉得这英语写的特别特别怪啊？好象文法不通似的。
: 有英文高手评价下吗？
|
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 10 哈哈。。。。我知道你在恐慌，怕更多人读此文
【在 p**********d 的大作中提到】
: 很多文法錯誤，但是這不是重要的。文章是熱血青年的調調，相當於高一的智商。
|
|
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 11 我一点不恐慌，这篇英文文法写的我捏着鼻子也没读下去。。。
“We are enjoying a happy life in such way of living is bringing us but at
greater costs than warranted. ”
完全不知所云，小将应好好学英文，你则有必要提高自己的英文鉴赏水平。
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈。。。。我知道你在恐慌，怕更多人读此文
|
L*********d
发帖数: 7037 | 12 用什么关键词在bing上找出来的？
这种英文是要写给谁看的？中式逻辑、中式英文，洋人如何看得懂。
other
from
feudalistic
【在 s***3 的大作中提到】
: I Can’t Understand It: Questions Put to Anti-China Advocates
: Fan Shouyi, CFAU, China
: I can’t understand why in a country where a great president warned his
: people that “a house divided against itself cannot stand,” there are a
: handful of people who won’t feel happy until they succeed in bringing other
: countries down?
: I can’t understand why in a country where black people were delivered from
: the yoke of slavery, there are some people who give their support to Dalai
: Lama, the spiritual leader in exile, who is a representative of feudalistic
: serfdom?
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 13 写给Wvmd这样的小将看的吧，你往楼上看，
他还激动的“wow!! 收藏了”
没把我笑翻了。
【在 L*********d 的大作中提到】
: 用什么关键词在bing上找出来的？
: 这种英文是要写给谁看的？中式逻辑、中式英文，洋人如何看得懂。
:
: other
: from
: feudalistic
|
p**********d
发帖数: 7918 | 14 你們小將就愛這樣的調調。此文的對象是誰？美國人讀了文章會幡然悔悟？
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈。。。。我知道你在恐慌，怕更多人读此文
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 15 我很怀疑美国人看到写成这样的英文还会读下去。
小将们不要生气，对美国宣传你不能指望让他们学英中文去，提高英文水平能更有效的
对美国人宣传。
如果对中国人宣传，就用中文好了。
写成这样的英文，到底打算让谁看？
【在 p**********d 的大作中提到】
: 你們小將就愛這樣的調調。此文的對象是誰？美國人讀了文章會幡然悔悟？
|
g**x
发帖数: 1192 | 16 你在不遗余力的转移话题。
这个帖子的题目是：“一篇google不到bing得到的好文：I Can’t Understand It:”
什么能搜索到跟它英文质量有关系么？
你喜欢读george chang的文章，就去读呗。这里有人拦着你么？
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 我很怀疑美国人看到写成这样的英文还会读下去。
: 小将们不要生气，对美国宣传你不能指望让他们学英中文去，提高英文水平能更有效的
: 对美国人宣传。
: 如果对中国人宣传，就用中文好了。
: 写成这样的英文，到底打算让谁看？
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 17 呵呵，关键在这个好文上而不在这个搜索的到不到。
英文写成这样，哪怕这文章是红楼梦的水平，也没人会认为这是传世之作了。
你以为上面那个WVMD夸好文他就真看了？那兄弟要真看了，早就一堆评论写出来了，那
才是他风格。
他压根没看（他也看不下去），但出于职业习惯，顶下支持下
【在 g**x 的大作中提到】
: 你在不遗余力的转移话题。
: 这个帖子的题目是：“一篇google不到bing得到的好文：I Can’t Understand It:”
: 什么能搜索到跟它英文质量有关系么？
: 你喜欢读george chang的文章，就去读呗。这里有人拦着你么？
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 18 我是GOOGLE不到BING也不到，不知道他怎么BING到的。
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，关键在这个好文上而不在这个搜索的到不到。
: 英文写成这样，哪怕这文章是红楼梦的水平，也没人会认为这是传世之作了。
: 你以为上面那个WVMD夸好文他就真看了？那兄弟要真看了，早就一堆评论写出来了，那
: 才是他风格。
: 他压根没看（他也看不下去），但出于职业习惯，顶下支持下
|
n******o
发帖数: 362 | 19 bing has the original CNN ireport article. Google does not. A little bit
strange. Probably nobody linked to the ireport article before?
范守义教授自1959年至1967年在北京外国语学院附属中学高中和北京外国语学院英语系
本科读书，1978再度于北京外国语大学英语系研究生班读书，硕士学位。1988和1995曾
先后赴英国兰卡斯特大学和美国加州大学伯克利分校进修各一年。1968年参加工作，赴
坦桑尼亚和赞比亚参加援建坦赞铁路。1981年来外交学院工作。1998国务院政府津贴获
得者，2010年国家级“外交外事翻译教学团队”带头人，2007年北京市级英语泛读精品
课程负责人。专著：《翻译研究：另类视野》（2004年），教材：《英语时文泛读》（
4册）及《英语时文泛读学习参考用书》（4册）总主编（2010年），读物：华裔美国作
家英语名著系列丛书《通往金山之路》主编（2002年）以及论文数十篇，英语杂志专栏
译稿中译英和英译中各数十篇。
It seems that we cannot trust english education of 外交学院, given the poor
english from the chair of english department.... |
n******o
发帖数: 362 | 20 only thing i can binged the cnn ireport, attributed to fan shouyi
however, no chinese reference to it no matter bing or google.
Who wrote it? 范守义 or someone else? the english is really poor.
The logic is even worse. |
|
|
n******o
发帖数: 362 | 21 i think ss123 has the answer.
how did someone find such an article that nobody ever paid attention which
was published several years ago. (no comments on CNN website, even during
the height of torch events)
It is more understandable if it is someone who googled himself, and get
pissed... |
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 22 我同意你的说法。但我刚表达过和你相同想法后，就被小将们指责说
“你在不遗余力的转移话题。”！！！！
【在 n******o 的大作中提到】
: only thing i can binged the cnn ireport, attributed to fan shouyi
: however, no chinese reference to it no matter bing or google.
: Who wrote it? 范守义 or someone else? the english is really poor.
: The logic is even worse.
|
s***3
发帖数: 793 | 23 全标题bing，或者只bing “I can't understand it, tibet”, 都出的来
【在 o****y 的大作中提到】
: 我是GOOGLE不到BING也不到，不知道他怎么BING到的。
|
g**x
发帖数: 1192 | 24 你就别忙活了。老将还是bing不出来。
【在 s***3 的大作中提到】
: 全标题bing，或者只bing “I can't understand it, tibet”, 都出的来
|
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 25 呵呵，我还真一句不差的看了。我的感觉是，作者读了以前流传的那首民族主义情
绪的诗，在那基础上重新发挥写出来的。我不认为该文英文水平很差。我刚开始以为是
老美写的，后来看到人称才知道是华人写的。
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，关键在这个好文上而不在这个搜索的到不到。
: 英文写成这样，哪怕这文章是红楼梦的水平，也没人会认为这是传世之作了。
: 你以为上面那个WVMD夸好文他就真看了？那兄弟要真看了，早就一堆评论写出来了，那
: 才是他风格。
: 他压根没看（他也看不下去），但出于职业习惯，顶下支持下
|
L*********d
发帖数: 7037 | 26 bing到你的mit贴，google到原贴
【在 s***3 的大作中提到】
: 全标题bing，或者只bing “I can't understand it, tibet”, 都出的来
|
p******r
发帖数: 1127 | 27 If you search ""I Can’t Understand It: Questions" on bing, you'll
get the original CNN article. Google didn't return the original cnn
article 2 hours ago.
em, it's a live example of google stealing data from Bing.
【在 L*********d 的大作中提到】
: bing到你的mit贴，google到原贴
|
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 28 哈哈，good one
【在 p******r 的大作中提到】
: If you search ""I Can’t Understand It: Questions" on bing, you'll
: get the original CNN article. Google didn't return the original cnn
: article 2 hours ago.
: em, it's a live example of google stealing data from Bing.
|
L*********d
发帖数: 7037 | 29 googling "I Can’t Understand It: Questions" still gets you the ariticle,
only not the one on ireport.
So bing gets you cnn ireport, google doesn't.
Is it what this is about, cnn ireport?
【在 p******r 的大作中提到】
: If you search ""I Can’t Understand It: Questions" on bing, you'll
: get the original CNN article. Google didn't return the original cnn
: article 2 hours ago.
: em, it's a live example of google stealing data from Bing.
|
g**x
发帖数: 1192 | 30 说你差，你就差，不差也差。不说你差，你就不差，差也不差。 |
|
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 31 你英语好不了。
不解释。呵呵。
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈，good one
|
d**e
发帖数: 863 | 32 I watched an interview in which a co-founder of Google (I forgot which one)
said one of the technological challenge for a search engine is the
capability to 'forget'. He said Google is designed to forget as fast as 1
month. The rationale is to provide most useful/valuable information.
Since this post mentioned the original article, Google is expected to 'learn
' the knowledge. But should nobody mention in again in the next couple of
months, Google would forget it again. |
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 33 我知道你会这么说^_^
其实你有料的可以指出他的那个句子有选词和语法错误的问题，什么问题，然后说明他
英语不好。你办不到。不过这也正常，汉奸LJ讲究的是没有依据的观点轰炸
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 你英语好不了。
: 不解释。呵呵。
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 34 我已经太学究气，你还想让我更学究气吗？我已经把其中一句话示众了。
这篇文章英语写的好不好，学过英语的人大都知道。
你死活说写得好，随你。
你知，我知，大家心理都知。
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: 我知道你会这么说^_^
: 其实你有料的可以指出他的那个句子有选词和语法错误的问题，什么问题，然后说明他
: 英语不好。你办不到。不过这也正常，汉奸LJ讲究的是没有依据的观点轰炸
|
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 35 我想问你，里面那一句话让你不知道作者在说什么？那一句话需要你停下来费解一下？
我读的时候，没有任何句子和用词distract my reading，这就够了。是的，这样的标
准比正式发表文章的标准要低，但这是网络阿，你要什么要求？
一篇文章出来，不讨论内容，而讨论英文，这是汉奸LJ习惯性的胆怯的体现。
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 我已经太学究气，你还想让我更学究气吗？我已经把其中一句话示众了。
: 这篇文章英语写的好不好，学过英语的人大都知道。
: 你死活说写得好，随你。
: 你知，我知，大家心理都知。
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 36 通篇不知所云。你翻译成中文我看看你是真看懂了还是没看懂。
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: 我想问你，里面那一句话让你不知道作者在说什么？那一句话需要你停下来费解一下？
: 我读的时候，没有任何句子和用词distract my reading，这就够了。是的，这样的标
: 准比正式发表文章的标准要低，但这是网络阿，你要什么要求？
: 一篇文章出来，不讨论内容，而讨论英文，这是汉奸LJ习惯性的胆怯的体现。
|
m***m
发帖数: 1158 | 37 Re!
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 我很怀疑美国人看到写成这样的英文还会读下去。
: 小将们不要生气，对美国宣传你不能指望让他们学英中文去，提高英文水平能更有效的
: 对美国人宣传。
: 如果对中国人宣传，就用中文好了。
: 写成这样的英文，到底打算让谁看？
|
w*******g
发帖数: 9932 | 38 你英文好, 显摆一下吧.
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 通篇不知所云。你翻译成中文我看看你是真看懂了还是没看懂。
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 39 你搞错了，我说过我英文不好的。参见第8楼。
其他东西参见第9。11。12楼。
【在 w*******g 的大作中提到】
: 你英文好, 显摆一下吧.
|
w*******g
发帖数: 9932 | 40 原作者写的人能看明白就够了. 你再怎么写都有人挑刺的.
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 你搞错了，我说过我英文不好的。参见第8楼。
: 其他东西参见第9。11。12楼。
|
|
|
w**w
发帖数: 107 | 41 re
other
from
feudalistic
【在 s***3 的大作中提到】
: I Can’t Understand It: Questions Put to Anti-China Advocates
: Fan Shouyi, CFAU, China
: I can’t understand why in a country where a great president warned his
: people that “a house divided against itself cannot stand,” there are a
: handful of people who won’t feel happy until they succeed in bringing other
: countries down?
: I can’t understand why in a country where black people were delivered from
: the yoke of slavery, there are some people who give their support to Dalai
: Lama, the spiritual leader in exile, who is a representative of feudalistic
: serfdom?
|
t*h
发帖数: 148 | 42 我见过国内推荐信里面最烂的一封也是北外英语系教授的，充斥了语法错误和别字。
【在 n******o 的大作中提到】
: bing has the original CNN ireport article. Google does not. A little bit
: strange. Probably nobody linked to the ireport article before?
: 范守义教授自1959年至1967年在北京外国语学院附属中学高中和北京外国语学院英语系
: 本科读书，1978再度于北京外国语大学英语系研究生班读书，硕士学位。1988和1995曾
: 先后赴英国兰卡斯特大学和美国加州大学伯克利分校进修各一年。1968年参加工作，赴
: 坦桑尼亚和赞比亚参加援建坦赞铁路。1981年来外交学院工作。1998国务院政府津贴获
: 得者，2010年国家级“外交外事翻译教学团队”带头人，2007年北京市级英语泛读精品
: 课程负责人。专著：《翻译研究：另类视野》（2004年），教材：《英语时文泛读》（
: 4册）及《英语时文泛读学习参考用书》（4册）总主编（2010年），读物：华裔美国作
: 家英语名著系列丛书《通往金山之路》主编（2002年）以及论文数十篇，英语杂志专栏
|
M**d
发帖数: 4418 | 43 呵呵，我知道你的策略之一是消耗我的时间。有些时候，我是将计就计，说话给旁观
者听，根本就没打算说服你。但这个太毫时间，我寻思不值。欢迎抓狂^_^
【在 b***0 的大作中提到】
: 通篇不知所云。你翻译成中文我看看你是真看懂了还是没看懂。
|
b***0
发帖数: 799 | 44 你是有任务的或者准确说是自己给自己下任务的.
你认为你发贴就是在爱国,就是在和中国的敌人做斗争.
你最大的优点就是不骂街,这点和大多数小将不同,这我多次夸过你.(也有一些不骂人且
态度比你好的,如WWW12?,不一一点名夸了)
但以为你不骂街就是摆事实讲道理的人,那就是相信母猪会上树了.呵呵.
道理也很简单，你相信兵不厌诈，为了战胜敌人，什么招都是可以使出来的。
【在 M**d 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，我知道你的策略之一是消耗我的时间。有些时候，我是将计就计，说话给旁观
: 者听，根本就没打算说服你。但这个太毫时间，我寻思不值。欢迎抓狂^_^
|
