u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 1 老美也喜欢用 “黄鼠狼（weasels）”来形容那些可恶的富人！
Not so with the weasels who run Deutsche Bank and Saxon in the Hurley case. They seem to be fighting the Hurley’s tooth and nail.
黄鼠狼们（weasels）运营德意志银行和银行撒克逊，他们对Hurley（一美国驻伊拉克士兵）敲骨吸髓（fight the Hurley’s tooth and nail）。
Too many seem to be run by spineless weasels, and they hurting men and women serving in armed armed forces.
太多的（银行）是那些无脊椎的黄鼠狼们（spineless weasels）在管理着，他们伤害着为这个国家服役的士兵们。
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
US Soldiers Losing Homes to Illegal Foreclosures
from The Big Picture by Barry Ritholtz
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/01/us-soldiers-losing-homes-t
Here is a story to shoot your blood pressure through the roof:
“While Sgt. James B. Hurley was away at war, he lost a heartbreaking
battle at home.
In violation of a law intended to protect active military personnel from
creditors, agents of Deutsche Bank foreclosed on his small Michigan house,
forcing Sergeant Hurley’s wife, Brandie, and her two young children to move
out and find shelter elsewhere.
When the sergeant returned in December 2005, he drove past the densely
wooded riverfront property outside Hartford, Mich. The peaceful little home
was still there — winter birds still darted over the gazebo he had built
near the water’s edge — but it almost certainly would never be his again.
Less than two months before his return from the war, the bank’s agents sold
the property to a buyer in Chicago for $76,000.”
And it only gets worse from there.
The Sergeant (retired, disabled) has been on a legal odyssey that is in its
7th year. He is battling Deutsche Bank Trust Company and Morgan Stanley
subsidiary Saxon Mortgage Services.
Under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, Hurley’s lawyers are seeking
punitive damages against the two giant banks. The NYT reports the specifics
of the Servicemembers Act:
“Under the law, only a judge can authorize a foreclosure on a protected
service member’s home, even in states where court orders are not required
for civilian foreclosures, and the judge can act only after a hearing where
the military homeowner is represented. The law also caps a protected service
member’s mortgage rate at 6 percent.”
Big banks routinely violated the act. Wells Fargo and Citigroup were cited,
as was JPMorgan Chase (they regularly overcharge servicemen, despite the law
).
But as bad as Chase has been, they seem to be trying to make amends. Not so
with the weasels who run Deutsche Bank and Saxon in the Hurley case. They
seem to be fighting the Hurley’s tooth and nail.
There are many reasons never to bailout banks, but here’s another one: Too
many seem to be run by spineless weasels, and they hurting men and women
serving in armed armed forces. (Aren’t there any ex service people working
at these banks that can get this taken care of promptly?)
Shame on Morgan Stanley, and shame Deutsche Bank.
>
Source:
A Reservist in a New War, Against Foreclosure
DIANA B. HENRIQUES
NYT, January 26, 2011 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/business/27foreclose.html | a********l
发帖数: 39524 | 2 fighting for the rich and powerful, this is what you end up with. | s****i
发帖数: 2993 | 3 most people lose their homes, deserve that. | u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 4 老美也喜欢用 “黄鼠狼（weasels）”来形容那些可恶的富人！
Not so with the weasels who run Deutsche Bank and Saxon in the Hurley case.
They seem to be fighting the Hurley’s tooth and nail.
黄鼠狼们（weasels）运营德意志银行和银行撒克逊，他们对Hurley（一美国驻伊拉克
士兵）敲骨吸髓（fight the Hurley’s tooth and nail）。
Too many seem to be run by spineless weasels, and they hurting men and women
serving in armed armed forces.
太多的（银行）是那些无脊椎的黄鼠狼们（spineless weasels）在管理着，他们伤害
着为这个国家服役的士兵们。 | p**********6
发帖数: 3408 | 5 这种事在美国被捅到媒体上，对事主的帮助大不大？在中国的话，这个事情上银行不敢
这么干了。 | a********l
发帖数: 39524 | 6 这篇不是正规的报道，类似天朝的一些新闻，语言随意，主观性强。 | u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 7 美国是法制国家，只要不犯法就可以了。
中国人首先想这事情合不合理，不合理的事情比不合法的事情更难让中国人接受。
【在 p**********6 的大作中提到】
: 这种事在美国被捅到媒体上，对事主的帮助大不大？在中国的话，这个事情上银行不敢
: 这么干了。
| u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 8 纽约时报的原文，语言随意，主观性强？
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/business/27foreclose.html?_r=
【在 a********l 的大作中提到】
: 这篇不是正规的报道，类似天朝的一些新闻，语言随意，主观性强。
|
| a********l
发帖数: 39524 | 9 对不起，我看的是你贴的类似op-ed的文章，没注意到里面引用了纽约时报的报道，原
报道当然是很正规的。 | u****n
发帖数: 7521 | 10 Not at all.
【在 a********l 的大作中提到】
: 对不起，我看的是你贴的类似op-ed的文章，没注意到里面引用了纽约时报的报道，原
: 报道当然是很正规的。
|
|
