d*********o
发帖数: 6388 | 1 http://news.rediff.com/column/2010/oct/15/column-rup-narayan-das-democratic-dividend-why-poorer-india-is-still-richer-than-china.htm
India stands 67th in the world poverty index, while China ranks 9th. Yet India's respectability in the world, particularly the West, lies in its steadfast adherence to ideas and ideals for democracy such as the rule of law, freedom of press, judicial activism and the vibrant civil society -- unlike China, says Rup Narayan Das.
...........
The just concluded Commonwealth Games is an illustration of India's vibrant and pulsating democracy, inconceivable in China, although there are instances where corrupt officials in China have been persecuted. In addition to its demographic dividend, pulsating, yet messy democracy, India has provided a healing touch to a myriad problems because democracy has a self-correcting and self-healing mechanism. For all that, India stands 67th in the world poverty index, while China ranks 9th. |
c******k
发帖数: 8998 | |
p******u
发帖数: 14642 | |
d****z
发帖数: 9503 | 4 这个poverty index是排名靠前好还是排名靠后好？ |
g*q
发帖数: 26623 | |
g*q
发帖数: 26623 | |
x*********g
发帖数: 11508 | 7 呵呵，写这文章的人得脑残到什么程度才能相信读者会脑残到相信他这些分析的地步啊。 |
p******u
发帖数: 14642 | 8 这是很有趣的社会心理学问题，就跟当年改革开放前一群傻子以为国外都是在水深火热
中挣扎着一样，自己欺骗自己，自己不去了解外界。等改革开放后这群傻子刺激太大就
变成了缝中必反的老将pussy先锋了。等过几年阿三真正认识到中国的发展成就时估计
也会有个很激烈的反pussy潮流
啊。
【在 x*********g 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，写这文章的人得脑残到什么程度才能相信读者会脑残到相信他这些分析的地步啊。
|
b****r
发帖数: 86 | 9 那个排名明明是饥饿指数，这个文章正确的题目应该是
Why hungrier India is still richer than China
Why malnourished India is still healthier than China |
o*****a
发帖数: 2335 | 10 为什么失败就是胜利
为什么失去就是得到
为什么死就是生
为什么不幸就是幸福
...
【在 b****r 的大作中提到】
: 那个排名明明是饥饿指数，这个文章正确的题目应该是
: Why hungrier India is still richer than China
: Why malnourished India is still healthier than China
|
