m****e
发帖数: 160 | 1 自己整理了几个问题和一些可能的回答，挂一漏万，请大家指教：
1) Why are you here today?
We are here today to voice out our opinions. Therefore we have prepared some
factual stuff for you guys. We do not have the whole story, yet neither
does Dailai have.
We are just presenting to you our side of the story, and the decision is
fully yours.
2) The Communist has invaded the independent Tibet in 1950s.
Sovereignty is a complicated issue, especially for a prolonged historical
problem. However, Tibet was NOT an “independent” state |
m****e
发帖数: 160 | 2 我的总体思路是：
1）摆事实讲道理：我们面对的不是ZD份子，而是受过良好教育的大学生和教授。美国
佬固然单纯，但UM这样的学校的美国佬绝对不甘心被人当傻子，因此咱们只要和颜悦色
地指出做人不能偏听偏信，情势就会比较有利。
2）承认过去ZF的一些过失，承认我们也有biasness. 但重要的不是我们的biasness，
而是what Dalai says cannot be the whole story either.
3）如果有人动不动就free Tibet 或者 Tibet independence，我们就说你们是在假设
ZD是解决问题的唯一/最佳方法，这个假设本身就是偏颇的。我们中国人一向是在“一
国”的前提下什么都可以谈，包括怎么自治，怎么改善人权。抓住“一中”的框架，应
该会比较利于发挥。
4）指出我们的基本价值观是暴力不能解决问题。在欧洲发生的事件挑战的不是中国作
为奥运承办国（对，我们只是承办国，抓住这一点）的失败，而是对于全人类所公认的
奥林匹克精神的挑战。
5）指出Dalai是藏传佛教的重要精神领袖，但是他无权在所有方面代表所有藏人。
目前想到这些，请大家指正并补充。 |
h****n
发帖数: 51 | 3 赞！
说的不错：）
【在 m****e 的大作中提到】
: 我的总体思路是：
: 1）摆事实讲道理：我们面对的不是ZD份子，而是受过良好教育的大学生和教授。美国
: 佬固然单纯，但UM这样的学校的美国佬绝对不甘心被人当傻子，因此咱们只要和颜悦色
: 地指出做人不能偏听偏信，情势就会比较有利。
: 2）承认过去ZF的一些过失，承认我们也有biasness. 但重要的不是我们的biasness，
: 而是what Dalai says cannot be the whole story either.
: 3）如果有人动不动就free Tibet 或者 Tibet independence，我们就说你们是在假设
: ZD是解决问题的唯一/最佳方法，这个假设本身就是偏颇的。我们中国人一向是在“一
: 国”的前提下什么都可以谈，包括怎么自治，怎么改善人权。抓住“一中”的框架，应
: 该会比较利于发挥。
|
z******j
发帖数: 33 | 4 对第二点我有点补充。
1. Sovereignty is *NOT* a complicated issue. 中国对西藏自古拥有主权。世界上
除英国之外的所有国家都承认中国对西藏的主权。这一点一定要明确。
不能说Tibet has been enjoying high level of sovereignty，只能说 Tibet is an
autonomous area. 这个sovereignty可不能随便用。
以下是一个美国人在主权问题上对藏独的驳斥，写得很地道，值得学习。
出处： http://discussions.pbs.org/viewtopic.pbs?t=68073&postdays=0&postorder=asc&topic_view=&start=30
1. You assert that "China has no right to govern in Tibet under the current
and historic terms of international law."
On what legal authority are you basing |
x**s
发帖数: 1085 | 5 一些建议。
1) Why are you here today?
We are here today to voice out our opinions. Therefore we have prepared some
factual stuff for you guys. We do not have the whole story, yet neither
does Dailai have.
We are just presenting to you our side of the story, and the decision is
fully yours.
》》不用和人说我们没有whole story，前两句就够了。回答最好精简扼要，尤其一般
老中说话带口音，多说不宜。
2) The Communist has invaded the independent Tibet in 1950s.
Sovereignty is a complicated issue, especially for a prolonged historical
problem. However, Ti
【在 m****e 的大作中提到】
: 自己整理了几个问题和一些可能的回答，挂一漏万，请大家指教：
: 1) Why are you here today?
: We are here today to voice out our opinions. Therefore we have prepared some
: factual stuff for you guys. We do not have the whole story, yet neither
: does Dailai have.
: We are just presenting to you our side of the story, and the decision is
: fully yours.
: 2) The Communist has invaded the independent Tibet in 1950s.
: Sovereignty is a complicated issue, especially for a prolonged historical
: problem. However, Tibet was NOT an “independent” state
|
e****r
发帖数: 377 | 6 For #4), Dalai is not really even spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism as
there are many different major branches of Tibetan Buddhisms. And he only
represents one subbranch of these branches. You can find out more from Wiki |
