W**********3
发帖数: 57 | | s********o
发帖数: 3319 | | r*******n
发帖数: 135 | 3 FA has errata. Should read. Maybe errata on errata...:-( | h*******r
发帖数: 182 | 4 Don't trust errata. The better way is to discuss during group study. And
always think critically and suspect every entry.
For example, pyrazinamide is correct in 2012 print copy, errata update as of
May 2012 is wrong, wiki is correct.
【在 r*******n 的大作中提到】
: FA has errata. Should read. Maybe errata on errata...:-(
| c****8
发帖数: 807 | |
|
