g*******s
发帖数: 490 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: otheraffairs (aff), 信区: Military
标 题: 怒了，UCSD化学教授公开歧视华裔 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 21 23:01:19 2011, 美东)
希望大家想办法通过媒体，youtube等扩大影响，
此事要毫不留情，争取对他造成实质影响。
才能警告其他的ws老板。
如果只是投诉给ucsd, nsf但是没有舆论压力，
估计会不了了之，浪费绝好机会。
发信人: ekin007 (纯国产), 信区: Chemistry
标 题: 怒了，UCSD化学教授公开歧视华裔
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 21 15:36:21 2011, 美东)
UC San Diego
http://kubiak.ucsd.edu/labrules.php
Lab Rules:
NO DISNEY MUSIC.
Don't be that guy.
If you can't turn on the instrument, you shouldn't use it.
Don't believe anything the Chinaman says. (Demoted from rules 1 & 2)
No ammount of time is acceptable for food-floor interaction, accept it,
it's
gone.
If you start a phosphine fire - don't panic. Well, maybe a little.
看第三条 | m**x
发帖数: 8454 | 2 'the' Chinaman... so it refers to a specific Chinese, am I right? | P**********n
发帖数: 6311 | 3 No
The often used term 'the Chinese people' also has a 'the'. But it still has
a general meaning.
In addition, he could have called that 'specific Chinese', 'the Chinese guy'
, instead of 'the Chinaman'.
In any cases, 'Chinaman' is a word with discriminate meaning.
【在 m**x 的大作中提到】
: 'the' Chinaman... so it refers to a specific Chinese, am I right?
| m**x
发帖数: 8454 | 4 Don't believe anything the Chinaman says.
or
Don't believe everything the Chinaman says.
which is the original version? the former one is more provoking |
|
