b***y
发帖数: 392 | 1 我还浪费近10个小时来审稿，当然第一遍看就打算据了，写的奇差。长长的据稿意见都
写完了，最后帮原作者推荐最密切相关文献时，发现稿件摘要70%抄袭，介绍部分则完
全抄袭另一杂志文章。打算在原来的评审意见前面加上这几行语句,是不是有些过分呢？
大家说说这种情况该怎么办？
This technical writing is by far the worst the reviewer has ever read or
reviewed. Reading through it is torturing, puzzling and time wasting,
especially when the reviewer find out that the author had borrowed contents
sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph from another journal paper,
which is listed below. The reviewer is appalled with the author's attitude | j****x
发帖数: 943 | | t**o
发帖数: 6659 | 3 第一句话就好了 然后锯掉 个人意见
呢？
contents
the "
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: 我还浪费近10个小时来审稿，当然第一遍看就打算据了，写的奇差。长长的据稿意见都
: 写完了，最后帮原作者推荐最密切相关文献时，发现稿件摘要70%抄袭，介绍部分则完
: 全抄袭另一杂志文章。打算在原来的评审意见前面加上这几行语句,是不是有些过分呢？
: 大家说说这种情况该怎么办？
: This technical writing is by far the worst the reviewer has ever read or
: reviewed. Reading through it is torturing, puzzling and time wasting,
: especially when the reviewer find out that the author had borrowed contents
: sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph from another journal paper,
: which is listed below. The reviewer is appalled with the author's attitude
| b***p
发帖数: 1398 | | c****z
发帖数: 613 | 5 这个有点儿过了吧？
据之
呢？
contents
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: 我还浪费近10个小时来审稿，当然第一遍看就打算据了，写的奇差。长长的据稿意见都
: 写完了，最后帮原作者推荐最密切相关文献时，发现稿件摘要70%抄袭，介绍部分则完
: 全抄袭另一杂志文章。打算在原来的评审意见前面加上这几行语句,是不是有些过分呢？
: 大家说说这种情况该怎么办？
: This technical writing is by far the worst the reviewer has ever read or
: reviewed. Reading through it is torturing, puzzling and time wasting,
: especially when the reviewer find out that the author had borrowed contents
: sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph from another journal paper,
: which is listed below. The reviewer is appalled with the author's attitude
| J****i
发帖数: 470 | 6 这就是为什么需要reviewer的地方。扒粪的干活。
呢？
contents
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: 我还浪费近10个小时来审稿，当然第一遍看就打算据了，写的奇差。长长的据稿意见都
: 写完了，最后帮原作者推荐最密切相关文献时，发现稿件摘要70%抄袭，介绍部分则完
: 全抄袭另一杂志文章。打算在原来的评审意见前面加上这几行语句,是不是有些过分呢？
: 大家说说这种情况该怎么办？
: This technical writing is by far the worst the reviewer has ever read or
: reviewed. Reading through it is torturing, puzzling and time wasting,
: especially when the reviewer find out that the author had borrowed contents
: sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph from another journal paper,
: which is listed below. The reviewer is appalled with the author's attitude
|
|
