G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 1 chess, Chinese chess, doudizhu, weiqi,
I failed all of the above when fighting against a computer.
How about you?
I have an idea, why can we not develop a smarter algorithm to beat them? | a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 2 Computer is always supposed to win a game for which"computing" is the key to
victory and the rules of the game are clearly defined.
It is like all the computer works. If the requirements are clearly defined,
the work can always be easily done.
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: chess, Chinese chess, doudizhu, weiqi,
: I failed all of the above when fighting against a computer.
: How about you?
: I have an idea, why can we not develop a smarter algorithm to beat them?
| G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 3 right.
Within 1 second, computer can think about 1 million steps.
Human being can think about at most ten steps.
this is why human being cannot win a robot.
to
,
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: Computer is always supposed to win a game for which"computing" is the key to
: victory and the rules of the game are clearly defined.
: It is like all the computer works. If the requirements are clearly defined,
: the work can always be easily done.
| G***G
发帖数: 16778 | 4 the key is chess rules.
because chess rules are open and clear. so computer can learn from it.
but in our reality, most of data don't come with rules. rules has to be
mined by computer. so most of computers failed to mine any rules.
to
,
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: Computer is always supposed to win a game for which"computing" is the key to
: victory and the rules of the game are clearly defined.
: It is like all the computer works. If the requirements are clearly defined,
: the work can always be easily done.
| i**********m
发帖数: 55 | 5 下五子棋会平局，但从来没赢过。
当然也是因为五子棋简单，想平局就做好防守不攻就行，等下满了就自动平局了 | m********n
发帖数: 3812 | 6 can AI teach you how to say "killer" correctly pronounced? | e******n
发帖数: 3435 | 7 当年下红白机的象棋，最弱的电脑小孩都打得我满地找牙。
【在 G***G 的大作中提到】
: chess, Chinese chess, doudizhu, weiqi,
: I failed all of the above when fighting against a computer.
: How about you?
: I have an idea, why can we not develop a smarter algorithm to beat them?
|
|
