N****w
发帖数: 21578 | |
d*****9
发帖数: 498 | 2 speed compare to chrome?
i think it looks not as concise as google, took a large space for address
bar/menu bar...
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: hoho
|
S***d
发帖数: 1802 | 3 It takes far less memory than Google Chrome. |
d********g
发帖数: 10550 | 4 好多插件没法用
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: hoho
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 5 没 menu bar 啊，4.0 的 bar 是最省空间了
【在 d*****9 的大作中提到】
: speed compare to chrome?
: i think it looks not as concise as google, took a large space for address
: bar/menu bar...
|
f*****Q
发帖数: 1912 | |
M*P
发帖数: 6456 | 7 发现用了chrome很难回头啊
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: hoho
|
E*U
发帖数: 2028 | 8 there is still a title bar. Chrome has title bar and tabs at the same place.
but chrome sucks.
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: 没 menu bar 啊，4.0 的 bar 是最省空间了
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 9 4.0 RC 也是这样了，tab bar 就在最上面
place.
【在 E*U 的大作中提到】
: there is still a title bar. Chrome has title bar and tabs at the same place.
: but chrome sucks.
|
E*U
发帖数: 2028 | 10 no. it is not. ubuntu 10.04. maybe in windows it is true
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: 4.0 RC 也是这样了，tab bar 就在最上面
:
: place.
|
|
|
M*P
发帖数: 6456 | 11 windows 7
【在 E*U 的大作中提到】
: no. it is not. ubuntu 10.04. maybe in windows it is true
|
M*P
发帖数: 6456 | 12 不成啊，chrome多线程的优势太大了。现在webapp这么多，你开一堆tab,firefox里随
便哪个tab慢，整个浏览器就慢的要死。chrome就一点问题也没有。
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: hoho
|
S***d
发帖数: 1802 | 13 It takes far less memory than Google Chrome. |
y*******g
发帖数: 6599 | 14 memory又不值钱
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: It takes far less memory than Google Chrome.
|
M*P
发帖数: 6456 | 15 应该是现在memory已经不值钱了。
【在 y*******g 的大作中提到】
: memory又不值钱
|
l*y
发帖数: 21010 | 16 装内存麻烦
【在 y*******g 的大作中提到】
: memory又不值钱
|
g******e
发帖数: 3760 | 17 you can configure it the same way as chrome
【在 d*****9 的大作中提到】
: speed compare to chrome?
: i think it looks not as concise as google, took a large space for address
: bar/menu bar...
|
g******e
发帖数: 3760 | 18 虽然没看出比chrome强在什么地方，但支持一下独立的mozilla也算是个不错的原因
【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: hoho
|
S***d
发帖数: 1802 | 19 From mozilla forum:
If I understand it correctly multithreading can be achieved on single core
or multicore setups, but Firefox multithreading(present since Firefox 3.0)
isn't optimized for multicore setups. Multiprocessing which a lot people
confuse with multithreading, can benefit from both multicore setups and
multithreading. I think with the fact that a lot of Firefox users still use
single core setups, Mozilla next step is to implement multiprocessing(
Electrolysis Project), which is currently focused on Mozilla's Fennec mobile
browser is to be completed on a later Firefox 4.X release, then my best
guess is eventually Mozilla will implement a more optimized multithreading
support for multicore setups, which may be in the works some time after
Firefox 4 release. |
f*****Q
发帖数: 1912 | 20 这个是mozilla的头说得，还是开发人员说得，还是爱好者说得，还是用户说的？
use
mobile
【在 S***d 的大作中提到】
: From mozilla forum:
: If I understand it correctly multithreading can be achieved on single core
: or multicore setups, but Firefox multithreading(present since Firefox 3.0)
: isn't optimized for multicore setups. Multiprocessing which a lot people
: confuse with multithreading, can benefit from both multicore setups and
: multithreading. I think with the fact that a lot of Firefox users still use
: single core setups, Mozilla next step is to implement multiprocessing(
: Electrolysis Project), which is currently focused on Mozilla's Fennec mobile
: browser is to be completed on a later Firefox 4.X release, then my best
: guess is eventually Mozilla will implement a more optimized multithreading
|
|
|
r****t
发帖数: 10904 | 21 我觉得很轻易就回头了
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: 发现用了chrome很难回头啊
|
r****t
发帖数: 10904 | 22 一堆 tab 切不过来的是 chrome 吧
【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: 不成啊，chrome多线程的优势太大了。现在webapp这么多，你开一堆tab,firefox里随
: 便哪个tab慢，整个浏览器就慢的要死。chrome就一点问题也没有。
|
T*o
发帖数: 363 | 23 chrome里一个tab是一个进程，怎么可能切不过来呢。
【在 r****t 的大作中提到】
: 一堆 tab 切不过来的是 chrome 吧
|
r****t
发帖数: 10904 | 24 内存不够，从 swap 里面切回来伤不起的。线程切回来就没问题。
【在 T*o 的大作中提到】
: chrome里一个tab是一个进程，怎么可能切不过来呢。
|
T*o
发帖数: 363 | 25 你256M内存，还是你开了100个tab？
好像我从来没在chrome里出现过不响应的情况，反倒是firefox经常crash还要重启，
chrome里这个就不会发生。
【在 r****t 的大作中提到】
: 内存不够，从 swap 里面切回来伤不起的。线程切回来就没问题。
|
