b*********k 发帖数: 35031 | 1 和hardcover相比较区别和优势是什么?谢谢啦
有看中的书没有hardcover,只有library binding版本的 | w**m 发帖数: 4061 | 2 The only real notable difference is that Library Bindings are done by a more
-or-less independent third-party, whereas a hardcover is issued by the
original publisher. Library bindings are more durable, but may not look as
nice as proper hardcovers (more utilitarian than decorative), and typically
lack dust jackets or anything like that.
In terms of recommendation, I only go for the library binding if a hardcover
version is not available. Like I said, it doesn't look as nice, but it's
certainly more durable than a paperback.
amazon上看来的 | b*********k 发帖数: 35031 | 3 多谢蚊子,那我入手一本看看,能难看到什么地步,哈哈
more
typically
hardcover
【在 w**m 的大作中提到】 : The only real notable difference is that Library Bindings are done by a more : -or-less independent third-party, whereas a hardcover is issued by the : original publisher. Library bindings are more durable, but may not look as : nice as proper hardcovers (more utilitarian than decorative), and typically : lack dust jackets or anything like that. : In terms of recommendation, I only go for the library binding if a hardcover : version is not available. Like I said, it doesn't look as nice, but it's : certainly more durable than a paperback. : amazon上看来的
| l*r 发帖数: 79569 | 4 还好吧,我理解就是图书馆那些hardcover,没觉得有啥特别的不同,好像笨重点?
【在 b*********k 的大作中提到】 : 多谢蚊子,那我入手一本看看,能难看到什么地步,哈哈 : : more : typically : hardcover
| b*********k 发帖数: 35031 | 5 大概我比较古怪,我觉得图书馆里那种书特有感觉,小时候一心想当图书馆管理员
【在 l*r 的大作中提到】 : 还好吧,我理解就是图书馆那些hardcover,没觉得有啥特别的不同,好像笨重点?
| l*r 发帖数: 79569 | 6 小时候那些硬壳书么?
那会儿一人一个小抽屉index cards找书也蛮好玩的
【在 b*********k 的大作中提到】 : 大概我比较古怪,我觉得图书馆里那种书特有感觉,小时候一心想当图书馆管理员
| b*********k 发帖数: 35031 | 7 恩,是啊
【在 l*r 的大作中提到】 : 小时候那些硬壳书么? : 那会儿一人一个小抽屉index cards找书也蛮好玩的
| b*s 发帖数: 82482 | 8 The only real notable difference is that Library Bindings are done by a more
-or-less independent third-party, whereas a hardcover is issued by the
original publisher. Library bindings are more durable, but may not look as
nice as proper hardcovers (more utilitarian than decorative), and typically
lack dust jackets or anything like that.
In terms of recommendation, I only go for the library binding if a hardcover
version is not available. Like I said, it doesn't look as nice, but it's
certainly more durable than a paperback.
和hardcover相比较区别和优势是什么?谢谢啦
有看中的书没有hardcover,只有library binding版本的
【在 b*********k 的大作中提到】 : 和hardcover相比较区别和优势是什么?谢谢啦 : 有看中的书没有hardcover,只有library binding版本的
| b*s 发帖数: 82482 | 9 peng
The only real notable difference is that Library Bindings are done by a more
-or-less independent third-party, whereas a hardcover is issued by the
original publisher. Library bindings are more durable, but may not look as
nice as proper hardcovers (more utilitarian than decorative), and typically
lack dust jackets or anything like that.
In terms of recommendation, I only go for the library binding if a hardcover
version is not available. Like I said, it doesn't look as nice, but it's
certainly more durable than a paperback.
amazon上看来的
【在 w**m 的大作中提到】 : The only real notable difference is that Library Bindings are done by a more : -or-less independent third-party, whereas a hardcover is issued by the : original publisher. Library bindings are more durable, but may not look as : nice as proper hardcovers (more utilitarian than decorative), and typically : lack dust jackets or anything like that. : In terms of recommendation, I only go for the library binding if a hardcover : version is not available. Like I said, it doesn't look as nice, but it's : certainly more durable than a paperback. : amazon上看来的
|
|