p***e 发帖数: 472 | 1 发现还是有很多要求记条款的,MPEP本身就很厚读一遍要不少时间,想去记住就更难了,
不知道大家都是怎么准备的,光作题可以么?希望有正在备考的交流一下经验。谢谢。 |
f**********h 发帖数: 38 | 2 You probably don't need to read the entire MPEP for the exam. I have to
admit that there are parts of the MPEP I never opened. Please also see
discussion of the same subject posted before.
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Law/31167531.html |
p***e 发帖数: 472 | 3 thanks, that is encouraging :-). thanks for the confirmation with MPEP,
since
some websites says we can "only search for specific text one chapter at a
time", which is misleading.
【在 f**********h 的大作中提到】 : You probably don't need to read the entire MPEP for the exam. I have to : admit that there are parts of the MPEP I never opened. Please also see : discussion of the same subject posted before. : http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Law/31167531.html
|
c***d 发帖数: 80 | 4 The MPEP provided at the test is searchable chapter by chapter. You really
do not need to read every chapter to pass the exam, although I did read it.
There were probably three questions I was not sure about and you only need
70% right to pass (I could be wrong with the exact number). If you leave out
some mpep chapters in reading, you might just be a bit slower during the
actual exam.
I do not think you need to read much on interference. |
p***e 发帖数: 472 | 5 Thanks a lot for sharing the experience. So my understanding is that
knowing the content of the chapters is the Key.
.
out
【在 c***d 的大作中提到】 : The MPEP provided at the test is searchable chapter by chapter. You really : do not need to read every chapter to pass the exam, although I did read it. : There were probably three questions I was not sure about and you only need : 70% right to pass (I could be wrong with the exact number). If you leave out : some mpep chapters in reading, you might just be a bit slower during the : actual exam. : I do not think you need to read much on interference.
|