g*********i
发帖数: 281 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
发信人: cynosurewang (star), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Hertz租到有问题的车
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jul 9 17:39:28 2007)
我在salt lake city 飞机场 Hertz 租一辆midsize 车 开车在yellowstone，glacier
park， grand teton park 玩了7天。
发现车的main.req. 灯亮了。不知怎么回事，开起来没有问题，但心里没底，有点担心
车况。尤其还是带着我妈妈。
回到租车处，checkin，我要求Hertz 人员在我的receipt上签字说明车子的问题。
她写了：engin light on 并签了字。
我买了collosion damage waiver 保险。
请问这种情况是不是Hertz rent problematic car to customer。
可不可以要求索赔。
谢谢 | c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 2 The general principle of "no harm, no foul" probably applies here. If OP did
not suffer any damages, I don't see how he can successfully recover
anything from Hertz. Nominal/punitive are also unlikely. | g*********i
发帖数: 281 | 3 agree. i don't think s/he can make a case in court.
the best thing is to file a complaint and very likely s/he
will get some sort of compensation (voucher?) from hertz for
his/her unhappy experience with their rental car.
did
【在 c**d 的大作中提到】
: The general principle of "no harm, no foul" probably applies here. If OP did
: not suffer any damages, I don't see how he can successfully recover
: anything from Hertz. Nominal/punitive are also unlikely.
|
|
