o**********e
发帖数: 18403 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: beijingren (to thine own self be true), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: NYT 暴露INFOSYS，TATA CS，HCL (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jun 6 11:38:38 2015, 美东)
Thank you, NYT for covering this. To really make an impact may I suggest a
follow up?
The list below barely scratches the surface of companies that have done this
same thing. If you were able to procure the client lists of HCL, Tata,
Infosys, Cognizant, Accenture, etc. I would virtually guarantee no less than
half their
major clients did not begin or expand their engagement coinciding with
laying off domestic workers.
Lucent (1996)
Siemens (2001)
Nielsen Media Research (2008)
WellPoint (2009)
GM (2009)
Marriott (2013)
Southern Cal Edison (2014)
IBM (2014)
Disney (2014)
Microsoft (2014)
AT&T (~2004)
American Express
Chrysler
WalMart (2104)
Harley Davidson (2013)
Fossil (2015)
Bank of America (2013)
Texas Instruments (2009)
USAA
Molina Healthcare (2011)
Northeast Utilities (2014)
American Bureau of Shipping (federal agency)
Wells Fargo
Cargill
Best Buy
3M
Intel
Honeywell
General Mills
Imation
Nike
Medtronic
United Health
Target, Homedepot,
JPM Chase,
Sony Pictures,
Anthem
Premera,
Ebay
Cisco,
VMware,
Qualcomm,
Adobe,
Healthcare dot gov,
states Insurance exchanges under Obama
rescue.gov (under the underqualified Obama's CTO Vivek Kundra) | W***n
发帖数: 11530 | 2 Needs stronger lobbies to counter 烙印's proliferated occupation of IT/
software job markets!
Be united! | y*********8
发帖数: 387 | 3 ‘o less than half their major clientsdid not begin or expand their
engagement coinciding with laying off domestic workers.’那不就是‘一半以上
的公司 没有 和layoff美国国内员工’同时开始，这是不是写错了和发帖人原意相反了
，原意是想说以下的公司和layoff同时开始.......confused。
list的公司到底有没有被烙印占领 |
|
