z*********n
发帖数: 203 | 1 Is anything wrong here?
int * n1 = NULL;
int * & n2 = n1;
n2 = new int(1);
delete n1;
n2 = new int(2);
delete n1; |
j*****y
发帖数: 1071 | 2 seems nothing wrong ?
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: Is anything wrong here?
: int * n1 = NULL;
: int * & n2 = n1;
: n2 = new int(1);
: delete n1;
: n2 = new int(2);
: delete n1;
|
z*********n
发帖数: 203 | 3 你确定？
how about this:
void foo(int * & n){}
【在 j*****y 的大作中提到】
: seems nothing wrong ?
|
s**x
发帖数: 7506 | |
s***0
发帖数: 117 | 5 Horrible code. Go read how new() and delete() work.
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: Is anything wrong here?
: int * n1 = NULL;
: int * & n2 = n1;
: n2 = new int(1);
: delete n1;
: n2 = new int(2);
: delete n1;
|
z*********n
发帖数: 203 | 6 horrible，但是好像没有错
【在 s***0 的大作中提到】
: Horrible code. Go read how new() and delete() work.
|
p*****p
发帖数: 379 | |
d**********x
发帖数: 4083 | 8 题目似乎就抄错了。。
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
: Is anything wrong here?
: int * n1 = NULL;
: int * & n2 = n1;
: n2 = new int(1);
: delete n1;
: n2 = new int(2);
: delete n1;
|
