p**********e
发帖数: 316 | 1 有什么经验， books， web sites? 请不吝赐教 |
c******7
发帖数: 439 | 2 你先说说你选ETF的目的是什么?
相比MF或者个股.
可以讨论一下.
【在 p**********e 的大作中提到】
: 有什么经验， books， web sites? 请不吝赐教
|
p**********e
发帖数: 316 | 3 当然是做投资了，
ETF相对于MF而言，有更大的灵活性。
以前版里有人推荐了一本书， Double your income in American's Finest Companies
, 非常好，值得推荐。这本书是关于stock选择的, 我这里发帖是想对ETF有更多的了解
和学习，Amazon上有好多关于ETF的书， 不知道哪一本比较合适。希望有经验的同学能
够推荐一下
【在 c******7 的大作中提到】
: 你先说说你选ETF的目的是什么?
: 相比MF或者个股.
: 可以讨论一下.
|
s********n
发帖数: 1962 | 4 Personally I don't like ETFs. The flexibility will usually do more
bad rather than good.
The ETF industry has been growing so fast that the qualities across
the board cannot be guaranteed. Many ETFs target fancy sectors to
attract "investors" (most of them are actually gamblers), but with
serious design flaws in them.
I would suggest you stick with MFs. As an investor, you don't need
the flexibility ETF claims.
Companies
【在 p**********e 的大作中提到】
: 当然是做投资了，
: ETF相对于MF而言，有更大的灵活性。
: 以前版里有人推荐了一本书， Double your income in American's Finest Companies
: , 非常好，值得推荐。这本书是关于stock选择的, 我这里发帖是想对ETF有更多的了解
: 和学习，Amazon上有好多关于ETF的书， 不知道哪一本比较合适。希望有经验的同学能
: 够推荐一下
|
b****n
发帖数: 993 | 5 ETF有一个好处：没有最小投资额度限制。如果盘子小，又想尽量分散的话，可以考虑
ETF.
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: Personally I don't like ETFs. The flexibility will usually do more
: bad rather than good.
: The ETF industry has been growing so fast that the qualities across
: the board cannot be guaranteed. Many ETFs target fancy sectors to
: attract "investors" (most of them are actually gamblers), but with
: serious design flaws in them.
: I would suggest you stick with MFs. As an investor, you don't need
: the flexibility ETF claims.
:
: Companies
|
c******7
发帖数: 439 | 6 我粗浅的认为ETF的既不能FA, 也不能TA,
硬做当然肯定可以, 我的意思是这些分析都不如个股有效.
主要是根据大势做一下资产配置.
hedge风险的不错的选择.
我喜欢ETF是因为帮我自动diversify了.
我不认为ETF有什么值得研究的独特的性质. |
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 7 ETF is just another derivative created by the WS
【在 p**********e 的大作中提到】
: 有什么经验， books， web sites? 请不吝赐教
|
q****x
发帖数: 7404 | 8 so does mf.
there are also 2x mf products.
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: ETF is just another derivative created by the WS
|
p**********e
发帖数: 316 | 9 选择ETF会带有一些比MF强一些的投机意味， liquidity比较好的ETF是不是很容易止损
呢？
【在 c******7 的大作中提到】
: 我粗浅的认为ETF的既不能FA, 也不能TA,
: 硬做当然肯定可以, 我的意思是这些分析都不如个股有效.
: 主要是根据大势做一下资产配置.
: hedge风险的不错的选择.
: 我喜欢ETF是因为帮我自动diversify了.
: 我不认为ETF有什么值得研究的独特的性质.
|
q****x
发帖数: 7404 | 10 for beginners, mf's probably be ok to help them not to over-trade, which is
a common issue.
but for experienced trader/investors, etf provides desired flexibility and
tax efficiency.
etf is a good instrument in my view. some etf's even have lower expense
ratio than its mf brother. see vea vs vdmix.
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: Personally I don't like ETFs. The flexibility will usually do more
: bad rather than good.
: The ETF industry has been growing so fast that the qualities across
: the board cannot be guaranteed. Many ETFs target fancy sectors to
: attract "investors" (most of them are actually gamblers), but with
: serious design flaws in them.
: I would suggest you stick with MFs. As an investor, you don't need
: the flexibility ETF claims.
:
: Companies
|
c******7
发帖数: 439 | 11 MF我倾向于用人不疑, 疑人不用.
不会试图过多time the market.
ETF是自己操作, 想怎么做看自己.
从这个角度自主性更大.
但MF你卖总能卖出去. 几天之内就能cash了
从这个角度来讲liquidity也不算太差就是了
【在 p**********e 的大作中提到】
: 选择ETF会带有一些比MF强一些的投机意味， liquidity比较好的ETF是不是很容易止损
: 呢？
|
