K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 1 日期(MM/DD/YY):
12/03/10
YTD:
6.92%
S&P 500: 9.83%
备注:
Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event. |
a*****n
发帖数: 5158 | 2 congrat
~~~~~~~~~~~ER?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
s**********n
发帖数: 868 | 3 +13.5%
+2.3% this week. I've been underperforming for about 4 weeks now...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 4 Roth 27.3%
PM holdings 37.3%
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
t*******d
发帖数: 2570 | 5 mutual fund: 10.78%
stock: 49.43% |
T*******t
发帖数: 9274 | 6 又看到了希望阿
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
a**n
发帖数: 2431 | 7 Personal Rate of Return from 01/01/2010 to 12/03/2010 is 8.5%
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
W***i
发帖数: 833 | 8 401k 3.73%; S&P 9.83%
A share -8.22%; Shanghai Index -13.26%
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
a**e
发帖数: 5794 | 9 10.19%
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 日期(MM/DD/YY):
: 12/03/10
: YTD:
: 6.92%
: S&P 500: 9.83%
: 备注:
: Beat the index by 2.2% (+5.4% vs +3.2%).
: One of my stocks had a blast this week due to a certain event.
|
a**x
发帖数: 255 | 10 401k - 19.3%
401k acct shows the true ability of long term investment because normally
few can trade in 401k account. |
|
|
T*******t
发帖数: 9274 | 11 long term investment or not dependes on the type of the investor,
not on the type of the account....ffdt
【在 a**x 的大作中提到】
: 401k - 19.3%
: 401k acct shows the true ability of long term investment because normally
: few can trade in 401k account.
|
a**x
发帖数: 255 | 12 there are significant differences for different types of accounts no matter
whether it's short or long term, because of totally different investment
choices.
【在 T*******t 的大作中提到】
: long term investment or not dependes on the type of the investor,
: not on the type of the account....ffdt
|
a**x
发帖数: 255 | 13 a good investor must be mixed with long/mid/short term investments.
【在 T*******t 的大作中提到】
: long term investment or not dependes on the type of the investor,
: not on the type of the account....ffdt
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 14 that's exactly why your claim that 401K return shows "ability" is false
because different 401K has different investment choices
some can buy what ever available and some can buy only index funds
for the latter, if they do not accurately/luckily time the market,
they have no ways of outperforming index
matter
【在 a**x 的大作中提到】
: there are significant differences for different types of accounts no matter
: whether it's short or long term, because of totally different investment
: choices.
|
a**x
发帖数: 255 | 15 this is exactly the point you didn't get: for most ppl who only have choices
of index funds to invest in 401k, it shows who are better, simply because
even with index funds, you still need to move money around; otherwise, it's
called dumb money.
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: that's exactly why your claim that 401K return shows "ability" is false
: because different 401K has different investment choices
: some can buy what ever available and some can buy only index funds
: for the latter, if they do not accurately/luckily time the market,
: they have no ways of outperforming index
:
: matter
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 16 in your first post, you did not mention that it was for people who only
have choices of index funds to invest in 401k.
I did say that for these people, they have to accuratly/luckily time
the market in order to outperform index. Whether or not one has the ability
to time the market accurately, or what you said "move money around" needs
to be proved over many years. Many times it was just pure luck IMO.
I know I dont have such an ability so I do not even bother trying it. Just
DCA in my account and be satisfied with the dumb money. I admire
those people who really can time the market and they should be able to earn
much more by playing those leveraged indices.
choices
s
【在 a**x 的大作中提到】
: this is exactly the point you didn't get: for most ppl who only have choices
: of index funds to invest in 401k, it shows who are better, simply because
: even with index funds, you still need to move money around; otherwise, it's
: called dumb money.
|
a**x
发帖数: 255 | 17 you need to take investment 101.
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: in your first post, you did not mention that it was for people who only
: have choices of index funds to invest in 401k.
: I did say that for these people, they have to accuratly/luckily time
: the market in order to outperform index. Whether or not one has the ability
: to time the market accurately, or what you said "move money around" needs
: to be proved over many years. Many times it was just pure luck IMO.
: I know I dont have such an ability so I do not even bother trying it. Just
: DCA in my account and be satisfied with the dumb money. I admire
: those people who really can time the market and they should be able to earn
: much more by playing those leveraged indices.
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 18 what you need to take is an elementary school reading and writing class
【在 a**x 的大作中提到】
: you need to take investment 101.
|
a**x
发帖数: 255 | 19 无知者无畏。
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: what you need to take is an elementary school reading and writing class
|
