boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Investment版 - 有人对这些Fund熟悉吗?
相关主题
Vanguard 401k options
[合集] bibbub, 能不能推荐个好的large cap growth 或large cap blend
401K election
问问在Vanguard开IRA的问题
如何投资公司的 401 K
401k all in stocks now
有没有vanguard的MF推荐?
新手请教一下vanguard的MF
请高手指点:vanguard Roth IRA 买哪个funds 比较合适?
OMG,401K今天除了VGSIX涨的,其他都是跌的
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: columbia话题: cap话题: growth话题: mid话题: life
进入Investment版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
e******e
发帖数: 162
1
如果从以下选两买,你会买哪两? (都没有交易费)
Columbia Large Cap Value NVLUX
Columbia Mid Cap Value NAMAX
Columbia Small Cap Value II NSVAX
Columbia Marsico Growth NGIPX
Columbia Mid Cap Growth CLSPX
Columbia Multi-Advisor Intl NIEQX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced NMIMX
Vanguard Mid Cap Index VIMSX
Vanguard Small Cap Index NAESX
Columbia Income SRINX
Columbia High Income NYPAX
Columbia Life Goal Balanced NBGPX
Columbia Life Goal Growth NGPAX
Columbia Life Goal Growth & Income NIPAX
Columbia Life Goal Income CLGZX
m****u
发帖数: 229
2
I haven't done any research yet but if the investment time is over 3 years,
I would just go with
Vanguard Mid Cap Index VIMSX
and
Vanguard Small Cap Index NAESX
because they usually have super low expense ratio/fee(0.3% or lower).
e******e
发帖数: 162
3
Fund Expenses
Management Fees: 0.77%
12b1 Expense: NA
Prospectus Gross Exp Ratio: 0.95%
最后的0.95% 是不是已经包括了前面的0.77%?
e******e
发帖数: 162
4
Fund performance as of 7/1/2010.
m****u
发帖数: 229
5
When did you get ur data?
I meant the 0.77 and 0.95.
Based on my understanding(correct me if I am wrong), 0.77 is part of the 0.
95. So, this 0.95 includes 0.77.
I don't like the wording from your data at all. Maybe I am not smart enough
but it looks pretty confusing.
I like the data to be displayed in the following link and it makes
everything clear.
http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/partsub/funds/purchinfo.asp?Funds=1&Symbol=NYPAX
If these funds are all you can pick for your 401K/403b etc,
e******e
发帖数: 162
6
I just got the data today from the link in my brokerage. I put them in this
form just for comparison purpose. And I believe there are other important
info not included. These are all the funds that available to choose for me,
not 401k though. But even my 401k account, the choices are not much
different from this list.
Looks like the top two have the best performances, not only short term but
also long term, except expense ratios are a little high.

enough

【在 m****u 的大作中提到】
: When did you get ur data?
: I meant the 0.77 and 0.95.
: Based on my understanding(correct me if I am wrong), 0.77 is part of the 0.
: 95. So, this 0.95 includes 0.77.
: I don't like the wording from your data at all. Maybe I am not smart enough
: but it looks pretty confusing.
: I like the data to be displayed in the following link and it makes
: everything clear.
: http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/partsub/funds/purchinfo.asp?Funds=1&Symbol=NYPAX
: If these funds are all you can pick for your 401K/403b etc,

m****u
发帖数: 229
7
>These are all the funds that available to choose for me
Where did you open your account? I am guessing the list of these funds is
from a crappy salesman's suggestion. I bet if you go with what this salesman
told u to pick, this salesman can make a big profit on the fees.
If you dont mind of reading Trad. Chinese, there is a blog you should check
it out:
http://greenhornfinancefootnote.blogspot.com/
The owner of this blog is a hardcore indexer. He has some interesting
thoughts on how active trad
l**********t
发帖数: 5754
8
For active managed funds, you shall ask for relative performance (excess
return over benchmark, net of all fees), instead of the absolute returns.
Based on net of fee returns form yahoo finance, most of the Columiba stock
funds under-perform their respective benchmarks (except for Columbia Mid Cap
Growth CLSPX, and Columbia Small Cap Value II NSVAX which handing to uder-
performance). You would be paying more for less if you invest in these
mutual funds.

【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Fund performance as of 7/1/2010.
e******e
发帖数: 162
9
Where to check "net of fee returns" or their benchmarks?
Thanks.

Cap
uder-

【在 l**********t 的大作中提到】
: For active managed funds, you shall ask for relative performance (excess
: return over benchmark, net of all fees), instead of the absolute returns.
: Based on net of fee returns form yahoo finance, most of the Columiba stock
: funds under-perform their respective benchmarks (except for Columbia Mid Cap
: Growth CLSPX, and Columbia Small Cap Value II NSVAX which handing to uder-
: performance). You would be paying more for less if you invest in these
: mutual funds.

l**********t
发帖数: 5754
10
where do you get the funds perf data? you shall get their benchmark perf
from the same source.
alternatively, search for EFTs for the corresponding benchmarks & download
their perf from yahoo finance.

【在 e******e 的大作中提到】
: Where to check "net of fee returns" or their benchmarks?
: Thanks.
:
: Cap
: uder-

1 (共1页)
进入Investment版参与讨论
相关主题
OMG,401K今天除了VGSIX涨的,其他都是跌的
真心请教mutual fund和etf
Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF 怎么样?
也帮我看看401k的基金选择(charles Schwab)
大家不担心将来自己的退休金被变相”共产“掉吗?
vanguard 的 roth ira能买etf吗
YTD Showoff (07/23/10)
YTD perf.
401k 投资选择
请问如何理解看懂这些fund的数据?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: columbia话题: cap话题: growth话题: mid话题: life