f****r
发帖数: 5118 | |
j*a
发帖数: 14423 | 2 dividend发不发都一样
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: 不发DIVIDEND 的股票长期拥有都图啥？
|
f****r
发帖数: 5118 | 3 DIVIDEND发多少是董事会决定的吗？没有DIVIDEND董事们都吃工资？ |
j*a
发帖数: 14423 | 4 先搞清楚啥是dividend
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: DIVIDEND发多少是董事会决定的吗？没有DIVIDEND董事们都吃工资？
|
f****r
发帖数: 5118 | 5 如果你自己清楚就请明白地说
如果自己也不清楚，就不要装凯子
【在 j*a 的大作中提到】
: 先搞清楚啥是dividend
|
m****u
发帖数: 229 | 6 Dividend comes with a tax consequences for high income ppl. If AAPL gives
out dividend, the prie of the stock has to be adjusted(downward). The ppl
who wants the dividend should be the ones that will retire really soon.
I think AAPL should not give out dividend because it should hold a pile of
cash to buy something when time is right and then create another iWhatever
to rock the world.
Dividend is like the cherry on top of a cake but the taste of cherry should
not be the reason why you buy the c |
D*****I
发帖数: 8268 | 7 图个涨的超过通货膨胀啊。。
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: 不发DIVIDEND 的股票长期拥有都图啥？
|
f****r
发帖数: 5118 | 8 俺不买goog/aapl，俺买股票很简单，巴肥买啥，我买啥 |
a**n
发帖数: 2431 | 9 实事求是说，这5年你偶像的战绩一般，俗手恶手不少
他确实赚了大钱的那关键几票，你还跟不了，呵呵，不是公开市场的买卖
不如直接买他公司股票了，如果你真崇拜
不算太贵
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: 俺不买goog/aapl，俺买股票很简单，巴肥买啥，我买啥
|
f****r
发帖数: 5118 | 10 是啊，我是小虾米，吃点残羹剩水，就满足了，好想买GS的Preferred stock，怎么买
呢？
他的公司股票，俺不买，因为巴肥岁数不小了，有点三长两短，俺心疼
【在 a**n 的大作中提到】
: 实事求是说，这5年你偶像的战绩一般，俗手恶手不少
: 他确实赚了大钱的那关键几票，你还跟不了，呵呵，不是公开市场的买卖
: 不如直接买他公司股票了，如果你真崇拜
: 不算太贵
|
|
|
D*****I
发帖数: 8268 | 11 他买的对他的大基数有用。。
买他买的，基本很难发财吧。。
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: 俺不买goog/aapl，俺买股票很简单，巴肥买啥，我买啥
|
s********h
发帖数: 158 | 12 i disagree on this point. if the mgmt cannot re-invest the profit
intelligently to generate higher returns, then the surplus profit should be
distributed to investors. age and retirement have nothing to do with it.
【在 m****u 的大作中提到】
: Dividend comes with a tax consequences for high income ppl. If AAPL gives
: out dividend, the prie of the stock has to be adjusted(downward). The ppl
: who wants the dividend should be the ones that will retire really soon.
: I think AAPL should not give out dividend because it should hold a pile of
: cash to buy something when time is right and then create another iWhatever
: to rock the world.
: Dividend is like the cherry on top of a cake but the taste of cherry should
: not be the reason why you buy the c
|
b****e
发帖数: 460 | 13 八飞对dividend的问题发表的意见是：对于每一美元的盈利，如果不发红利我能增加的
内在价值超过一美元，那么我就不发，如果不发红利我能增加的内在价值少于一美元那
么我就发。
另外八飞对于红利的另一个看法是他认为红利的问题有点像家长和孩子的零花钱的问题
。
当然，事实上很多情况下红利的问题是华尔街和股份公司的一个游戏，发不发红利对于
很多企业来说根本不是回报率的问题。
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: 不发DIVIDEND 的股票长期拥有都图啥？
|
h****h
发帖数: 1168 | 14 haha,
零花钱和家里存款的关系,
如果大家看零花钱决定家里存款,那很好骗人啊
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】
: 八飞对dividend的问题发表的意见是：对于每一美元的盈利，如果不发红利我能增加的
: 内在价值超过一美元，那么我就不发，如果不发红利我能增加的内在价值少于一美元那
: 么我就发。
: 另外八飞对于红利的另一个看法是他认为红利的问题有点像家长和孩子的零花钱的问题
: 。
: 当然，事实上很多情况下红利的问题是华尔街和股份公司的一个游戏，发不发红利对于
: 很多企业来说根本不是回报率的问题。
|
l**********t
发帖数: 5754 | 15 in addition to tax consideration, dividend (or lack of) policy is a signal
to its shareholders. If the shareholders believe a company has access to
unique investment opportunities with great growth potential, they prefer the
company to reinvest its earnings.
Once a firm/industry matures (cash inflow >> reinvestment needs), it is
supposed to return the earnings to shareholders (dividend or stock buyback).
For example, MSFT. |
n******n
发帖数: 12088 | 16 then why not give the share holders a choice? those confident can re-invest.
the
).
【在 l**********t 的大作中提到】
: in addition to tax consideration, dividend (or lack of) policy is a signal
: to its shareholders. If the shareholders believe a company has access to
: unique investment opportunities with great growth potential, they prefer the
: company to reinvest its earnings.
: Once a firm/industry matures (cash inflow >> reinvestment needs), it is
: supposed to return the earnings to shareholders (dividend or stock buyback).
: For example, MSFT.
|
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 17 you can always sell your shares.
invest.
【在 n******n 的大作中提到】
: then why not give the share holders a choice? those confident can re-invest.
:
: the
: ).
|
m*****u
发帖数: 1342 | 18 MSFT has dividend, one can buy MSFT if he/she likes dividend.
AAPL has the momentum for now, I think it could touch $300, then go no where
like MSFT did since 2000.
GOOG is clearly already in downward trend, I really can not understand why
people would long GOOG.
【在 f****r 的大作中提到】
: 不发DIVIDEND 的股票长期拥有都图啥？
|
s********h
发帖数: 158 | 19 my view is the opposite. excess cash should always be return to the
shareholders, UNLESS the mgmt has good reasons to retain it, for instance,
generate higher returns, make accquisitions or fight off litigations. it
should be the mgmt's responsibility to show the result of the re-investment.
if the mgmt can't show that over some period of time, then it better has a
good reason for the shareholders. cash may be more important in today's
market than before, but hording $25b, as in google's case, s
【在 l**********t 的大作中提到】
: in addition to tax consideration, dividend (or lack of) policy is a signal
: to its shareholders. If the shareholders believe a company has access to
: unique investment opportunities with great growth potential, they prefer the
: company to reinvest its earnings.
: Once a firm/industry matures (cash inflow >> reinvestment needs), it is
: supposed to return the earnings to shareholders (dividend or stock buyback).
: For example, MSFT.
|
n******n
发帖数: 12088 | 20 the re-inv decision should be made by the owner, not the agent.
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: you can always sell your shares.
:
: invest.
|
