s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 1 最近在填写485，关于其中一个问题，是否receive过public assistance的，如果四年
前老婆领过WIC的话，是否该填yes？不知道有没有经验人士可以告知一下，谢谢 |
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 3
非常感谢回复，和我律师的说法一致，但是因为网上有各种疑问，所以还是来论坛咨询
一下
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 填yes。反正没有害处
|
k****r
发帖数: 456 | 4 现在不是说要搞拿过wic的人吗？还有medic aid |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 5
有听说过，不过相信不会是一刀切的，其实他们审的时候好像都会查这些东西，而且已
经4年前就没有再领过了
【在 k****r 的大作中提到】
: 现在不是说要搞拿过wic的人吗？还有medic aid
|
b*******c
发帖数: 395 | |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 7
这个网页我开始也看到了，不过他说的是public charge，WIC肯定不是，但是485问的
是public assistance，好像不一样，所以我一直很迷惑
【在 b*******c 的大作中提到】
: 按照USCIS的网页WIC是不算public charge的。
: 自己读这个网页：
: https://www.uscis.gov/greencard/public-charge
|
b*******c
发帖数: 395 | 8 485 Instructions 第7页：
If you answer “Yes” to Part 8., Item Numbers 61. and 62., attach evidence
of any public assistance you received, or are likely to receive while in the
United States. For more information on the receipt of public benefits and
its impact on public charge determinations, please see
www.uscis.gov
【在 s*******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 这个网页我开始也看到了，不过他说的是public charge，WIC肯定不是，但是485问的
: 是public assistance，好像不一样，所以我一直很迷惑
|
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 9
evidence
the
and
所以您的意思是我的情况需要填“yes”并且提供WIC证据，但是WIC并不属于public
charge，所以不会有影响是吗？非常感谢您的回复
【在 b*******c 的大作中提到】
: 485 Instructions 第7页：
: If you answer “Yes” to Part 8., Item Numbers 61. and 62., attach evidence
: of any public assistance you received, or are likely to receive while in the
: United States. For more information on the receipt of public benefits and
: its impact on public charge determinations, please see
: www.uscis.gov
|
k****r
发帖数: 456 | |
|
|
c*********8
发帖数: 1327 | |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 12
现在还在纠结，律师让我填yes，但是提供addendum
【在 k****r 的大作中提到】
: 你最后怎么填？
|
C*********r
发帖数: 2671 | |
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 14 谁说不算？
【在 C*********r 的大作中提到】
: wic medicaid都不算
|
c*********8
发帖数: 1327 | 15 state and non cash allowance
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 谁说不算？
|
b******i
发帖数: 2536 | 16 应该是wic和medicaid都不算，只要不是领的钱 |
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 17 人家问的是public assistance，不是问“领钱的public assistance”
【在 b******i 的大作中提到】
: 应该是wic和medicaid都不算，只要不是领的钱
|
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 18 最近在填写485，关于其中一个问题，是否receive过public assistance的，如果四年
前老婆领过WIC的话，是否该填yes？不知道有没有经验人士可以告知一下，谢谢 |
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 20
非常感谢回复，和我律师的说法一致，但是因为网上有各种疑问，所以还是来论坛咨询
一下
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 填yes。反正没有害处
|
|
|
k****r
发帖数: 456 | 21 现在不是说要搞拿过wic的人吗？还有medic aid |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 22
有听说过，不过相信不会是一刀切的，其实他们审的时候好像都会查这些东西，而且已
经4年前就没有再领过了
【在 k****r 的大作中提到】
: 现在不是说要搞拿过wic的人吗？还有medic aid
|
b*******c
发帖数: 395 | |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 24
这个网页我开始也看到了，不过他说的是public charge，WIC肯定不是，但是485问的
是public assistance，好像不一样，所以我一直很迷惑
【在 b*******c 的大作中提到】
: 按照USCIS的网页WIC是不算public charge的。
: 自己读这个网页：
: https://www.uscis.gov/greencard/public-charge
|
b*******c
发帖数: 395 | 25 485 Instructions 第7页：
If you answer “Yes” to Part 8., Item Numbers 61. and 62., attach evidence
of any public assistance you received, or are likely to receive while in the
United States. For more information on the receipt of public benefits and
its impact on public charge determinations, please see
www.uscis.gov
【在 s*******y 的大作中提到】
:
: 这个网页我开始也看到了，不过他说的是public charge，WIC肯定不是，但是485问的
: 是public assistance，好像不一样，所以我一直很迷惑
|
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 26
evidence
the
and
所以您的意思是我的情况需要填“yes”并且提供WIC证据，但是WIC并不属于public
charge，所以不会有影响是吗？非常感谢您的回复
【在 b*******c 的大作中提到】
: 485 Instructions 第7页：
: If you answer “Yes” to Part 8., Item Numbers 61. and 62., attach evidence
: of any public assistance you received, or are likely to receive while in the
: United States. For more information on the receipt of public benefits and
: its impact on public charge determinations, please see
: www.uscis.gov
|
k****r
发帖数: 456 | |
c*********8
发帖数: 1327 | |
s*******y
发帖数: 1 | 29
现在还在纠结，律师让我填yes，但是提供addendum
【在 k****r 的大作中提到】
: 你最后怎么填？
|
C*********r
发帖数: 2671 | |
|
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 31 谁说不算？
【在 C*********r 的大作中提到】
: wic medicaid都不算
|
c*********8
发帖数: 1327 | 32 state and non cash allowance
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 谁说不算？
|
b******i
发帖数: 2536 | 33 应该是wic和medicaid都不算，只要不是领的钱 |
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 34 人家问的是public assistance，不是问“领钱的public assistance”
【在 b******i 的大作中提到】
: 应该是wic和medicaid都不算，只要不是领的钱
|
e*****p
发帖数: 15 | 35 What publicly funded benefits may not be considered for public charge
purposes?
A. Non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care)
are generally not taken into account for purposes of a public charge
determination.
Special-purpose cash assistance is also generally not taken into account for
purposes of public charge determination.
Non-cash or special-purpose cash benefits are generally supplemental in
nature and do not make a person primarily dependent on the government for
subsistence. Therefore, past, current, or future receipt of these benefits
do not impact a public charge determination. Non-cash or special purpose
cash benefits that are not considered for public charge purposes include:
Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public
assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of
communicable diseases; use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation
services, and emergency medical services) other than support for long-term
institutional care
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
Nutrition programs, including Food Stamps, the Special Supplemental
Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School
Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency
food assistance programs
Housing benefits
Child care services
Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (
LIHEAP)
Emergency disaster relief
Foster care and adoption assistance
Educational assistance (such as attending public school), including benefits
under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary, or higher
education
Job training programs
In-kind, community-based programs, services, or assistance (such as soup
kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
State and local programs that are similar to the federal programs listed
above are also generally not considered for public charge purposes. Please
be aware that states may adopt different names for the same or similar
publicly funded programs. It is the underlying nature of the program, not
the name adopted in a particular state, which determines whether or not it
should be considered for public charge purposes. In California, for example,
Medicaid is called "Medi-Cal" and CHIP is called "Healthy Families." These
benefits are not considered for public charge purposes.
In addition, and consistent with existing practice, cash payments that have
been earned, such as Title II Social Security benefits, government pensions,
and veterans' benefits, among other forms of earned benefits, do not
support a public charge determination. Unemployment compensation is also not
considered for public charge purposes. |
