a******e 发帖数: 94 | 1 专业:Chemistry
Paper:15
Citation: 210 寄出时
RD:7/21/17
PP:9/14/17
Rfe:9/18/17
承认paper和review,但认为paper没有major significance.
0011看得很细,认为最多一篇文章70引用,属于10%但没有证明是major significance
。两个推荐人非直接引用不能显示第一手的价值。有一个Granted Patent,没有商业应
用。
To assist in determining whether your contributions are original and of
major significance in the field, you may submit objective, independent
evidence:
that your contributions provoked widespread public commentary in the field
that your publications garnered a significant number of independent
citations
that your work is implemented by others, evidence such as:
contracts with companies using your products
licensed technology used by others
patents currently utilized and shown to be significant in the field.
And you may submit additional testimony and/or letters from experts
discussing your contributions of major significance. please note that
letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about your contributions and must explain in detail how the
contributions are original (not merely replicating the work of others) and
how they are of major significance. |
t*********a 发帖数: 516 | 2 你搜搜我的帖子看能不能有点思路.0011还是讲理的 |
b*******t 发帖数: 297 | |
J********n 发帖数: 159 | 4 你可以把研究领域缩小么?
如果在这个领域研究的人不多,你是先驱,也是不错的。
significance
【在 a******e 的大作中提到】 : 专业:Chemistry : Paper:15 : Citation: 210 寄出时 : RD:7/21/17 : PP:9/14/17 : Rfe:9/18/17 : 承认paper和review,但认为paper没有major significance. : 0011看得很细,认为最多一篇文章70引用,属于10%但没有证明是major significance : 。两个推荐人非直接引用不能显示第一手的价值。有一个Granted Patent,没有商业应 : 用。
|
w******n 发帖数: 18 | 5 版主,我也是学化学的,上个月也交了140到NSC,已经给您发了站内信,可以一起交流
吗?谢谢。 |
x********3 发帖数: 15 | 6 0011是NSC仅次于0214的杀手!
本人也是第一次交遇到0011,承认文章和审稿,质疑contribution,RFE交上去就被拒
了。
另外一个同是西北大学薄厚的老兄,也是一样被承认文章和审稿,质疑contribution,
RFE交上去就被拒了。
建议撤了重交,当然也可以试一试,不过要是被拒了又要再多等几个月再交,要是时间
上不着急又想奇迹出现试试也无妨。不过要是时间比较紧的话,还是不要跟0011玩了,
这货绝对是杀手。 |