p********y
发帖数: 5044 | 1 EB1B，只能用公司的律师，F家的律师，只想交4封推荐信，一封我的公司老板写公司如
何需要我，一封合作的欧
洲教授写我的publication，一封另一个公司没有引用我文章的独立推荐信写我对其他
领域的公司的影响（分量很低，因为没引用，没专利应用），还有一封引用我文章的推
荐信。
关于引用我文章的推荐信，我原来是准备了3个人，一个中国，一个德国，一个美国国
家实验室的，都是独立推荐人。这样子看上去很有分量。可是律师偏偏不干，只要中国
的那个写推荐信，然后在推荐信里提到那个德国的和美国国家实验室的人如何引用我的
文章。这种推荐信也太假了吧，哪个推荐人吃饱撑着，还研究我的文章被谁引用，怎么
引用啊。而且我原本三封独立推荐信，现在只剩下了一封。contribution不被rfe才怪
了。早知道最后只剩一封，我当初何必辛苦去找人要推荐信呢？真的是。。。我现在怎
么跟她argue？我想再争取一封独立的引用我文章的推荐信啊。
律师原文：
I combined your 2nd, 3rd and 4th contributions into one letter as one
mention of a citation (specifically in contribution #2) would not have been
enough to build an entire letter around. I selected Dr. Yu as the letter
writer as I believe he is the most qualified, but feel free to adjust who
you would like to write the letter.
With these contributions letters, we should focus less on the publications
and who is citing them and more on the intrinsic impact that this work has
had on the field, and the substantive value that your work has brought. Of
course, a large part of that is a demonstration that other researchers have
benefited from your work, but we should also show and explain the tangible
impact that this has had on the field, as well as include examples of how
this work can be used in the real world. Please see my comments in-line and
let me know if they make sense or if you have any questions or push-back on
them. Feel free to make suggestions or challenge my claims - this should be
as collaborative a process as possible. | d*******u
发帖数: 5337 | | c**n
发帖数: 463 | 3 如果是1b 律师是对你的公司负责而不是你，如果和律师沟通无果只能找你的老板反映了
从好的方面想 1b要求偏低 可能糊弄糊弄也就过了 | m******y
发帖数: 147 | | p********y
发帖数: 5044 | 5 1b，只能用公司的律师，不是花钱的问题。帮我想想怎么argue呗，多谢了 | p********y
发帖数: 5044 | 6 我还没和她沟通过，昨晚发给我的draft，才知道她要这么搞。我想先沟通下，但是怎
么沟通比较有说服力呢？从什么角度说服？我就想再争取一封引用我文章的推荐信
映了
【在 c**n 的大作中提到】
: 如果是1b 律师是对你的公司负责而不是你，如果和律师沟通无果只能找你的老板反映了
: 从好的方面想 1b要求偏低 可能糊弄糊弄也就过了
| N*****4
发帖数: 167 | |
|
