o*****n
发帖数: 445 | |
D**9
发帖数: 115 | 2 Hello All:
All the cases reported here on MITBBS from Guo Law are real cases from real
clients.
If anyone can show that one of the cases is not a real one, we would prepare
an EB1 or NIW case for you free of charge.
Any question, please contact Guo Law.
【在 o*****n 的大作中提到】
: 经常看到，有感而发。
|
o*****n
发帖数: 445 | |
D**9
发帖数: 115 | 4 There is a big difference between 托贴 and experience sharing.
More importantly, some IDs here are questioning the authenticity of the
posts just based on some superficial facts......which is ...........Most IDs
here should have Ph.D. degrees......
【在 o*****n 的大作中提到】
: 修改了原文，提个建议。
|
Z**a
发帖数: 2243 | 5 准你发还不准别人质疑了么？少回帖多干活才是王道，不要跟德州版那个小熊老板娘一
样，别人一说他不好，就出来跟人吵架，最后名声也臭了
IDs
【在 D**9 的大作中提到】
: There is a big difference between 托贴 and experience sharing.
: More importantly, some IDs here are questioning the authenticity of the
: posts just based on some superficial facts......which is ...........Most IDs
: here should have Ph.D. degrees......
|
A**o
发帖数: 542 | 6 有一点很好奇：德州的批准率大概70%不到，内布拉斯加的是50%不到。平均60%吧。从
各大律师的宣传看来，基本都是95%以上（有一个宣称99%），看来其他律师或者DIY的
基本都是40-50%左右？（考虑到这几个大所的顾客数量）。计算不合理，权当笑话吧。 |
s***a
发帖数: 671 | |
D******1
发帖数: 327 | |
|
p*******n
发帖数: 445 | 9 那些帖子提供的经验相当有限，吹律师倒是不遗余力，这样只能起到反效果。
既然是要招揽潜在客户，还不花功夫摸准潜在客户的心理，真是呵呵
IDs
【在 D**9 的大作中提到】
: There is a big difference between 托贴 and experience sharing.
: More importantly, some IDs here are questioning the authenticity of the
: posts just based on some superficial facts......which is ...........Most IDs
: here should have Ph.D. degrees......
|
a**l
发帖数: 219 | 10 我觉得那些帖子是律师自己人写的，应该是征得当事人同意的，看来看去笔法都差不多
... |
