C******8
发帖数: 501 | 1 现在申O1，律师给了初稿让给意见，对比了版上EB1的一些模板，感觉风格很不一样，
搞不懂需要修改点什么。
主要区别有:
1. 只有概括介绍research和对推荐信的摘抄，没有大段论述研究的意义影响等
2. 没有讲发表文章的地方是什么水平，只是随便选了几个说在这些地方发表了。看到
板上的模板一般有ranking和impact factor的介绍，还会讲平均引用率。不知道会不会
有问题？
感觉o1好像同时具备了eb1a（要满足三项）和eb1b（雇主发起申请）的特点，找不到什
么参考材料，主要都是看的eb1的材料，实在拿捏不准阿。求板上大牛指教！ | H*H
发帖数: 1244 | 2 O1 is actually differently from EB1A. if you look at the criteria for O1
listed on the USCIS website, you will find it focuses on "national or
international recognition". it is more important to emphasis on recognition.
Your independent letters from established professionals prove the
recognition, a much lower standard compare to EB1a. EB1a focuses, however,
more on the significant contributions. You lawyer is doing it right.
If you want to use your O1 materials for EB1a application, unless you have
solid proof to provide for significant contributions, you should completely
re-write the PL> | C******8
发帖数: 501 | 3 Thanks a lot. I read the O1 description again, and recognition is indeed the
focus.
recognition.
however,
completely
【在 H*H 的大作中提到】
: O1 is actually differently from EB1A. if you look at the criteria for O1
: listed on the USCIS website, you will find it focuses on "national or
: international recognition". it is more important to emphasis on recognition.
: Your independent letters from established professionals prove the
: recognition, a much lower standard compare to EB1a. EB1a focuses, however,
: more on the significant contributions. You lawyer is doing it right.
: If you want to use your O1 materials for EB1a application, unless you have
: solid proof to provide for significant contributions, you should completely
: re-write the PL>
|
|
