a***r 发帖数: 146 | 1 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
google scholar.
我收到如下的RFE:
Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
significance of the field beyond the institutions who have employed him.
For example, ... 列举了我的两封推荐信,说the writers did not describe in any
detail how the petitioner's work has been of major importance to
institutions beyond those that have employed him.
我想再补上两封independent的推荐信,除此之外也想不出还有什么方法?
In addition, the record includes several research articles that have cited
the petitioner's collaborative research, showing a moderate citation level,
however it is not apparent that these represent the total number of
citations the petitioner's work has received. The petitioner's own list of
citations is insufficient as it is not primary evidence such as an online
citation index.
不知道最后一句话是什么意思? 难道google scholar 打出的citation list 不够权威
?在其它网站找到我的citation要少一些...
The petitioner should also submit concise evidence of the number of
independent citations his published work has received, such as screen prints
of an online citation index. The evidence must identify citing authors in
order to distinguish independent citations from self citations by the
petitioner and his collaborators.
如何强调independent citation? 可不可以打出google scholar citation list, 然后
highlight citing author以及他们的institutions?
现在没什么头绪,觉得很受挫折,很感谢任何建议。
谢谢 |
b*******e 发帖数: 24532 | 2 这些意思就是说你的RL 写得很糟糕. 这种情况都是因为RL里面使用太多的general
description所致. 可以参看genegun老枪的文章关于如何写RL. Kathy的文章里面也提
及了RL一些框架,供参考.
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】 : 我的Case 的背景是这样的: : Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first : author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to : google scholar. : 我收到如下的RFE: : Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or : business_related contributions of major significance in the field: : Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the : petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance, : they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
|
r******y 发帖数: 21907 | 3 citation少你是不是没强调top percentage?我inde的也不多,不过加上了中文的凑数
,不知道会不会也被REF..
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】 : 我的Case 的背景是这样的: : Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first : author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to : google scholar. : 我收到如下的RFE: : Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or : business_related contributions of major significance in the field: : Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the : petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance, : they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
|
b*******e 发帖数: 24532 | 4 是RFE, not REF,
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : citation少你是不是没强调top percentage?我inde的也不多,不过加上了中文的凑数 : ,不知道会不会也被REF.. : : first : importance,
|
r******y 发帖数: 21907 | 5 噢,打错了,呵呵。。。
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】 : 是RFE, not REF,
|
i******t 发帖数: 22541 | 6 蜜蜂兄去开事务所吧 比他们律师便宜些
光吃班上的就可以了
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】 : 是RFE, not REF,
|
b*******e 发帖数: 24532 | 7 呵呵
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : 噢,打错了,呵呵。。。
|
b*******e 发帖数: 24532 | 8 挨,现在我只想攒人品阿,如果再过两星期还没批,我就准备义务帮大家改RL, 改到批为
止,呵呵
【在 i******t 的大作中提到】 : 蜜蜂兄去开事务所吧 比他们律师便宜些 : 光吃班上的就可以了
|
a***r 发帖数: 146 | 9 谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思? |
a***r 发帖数: 146 | 10 谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思? |
|
|
c********u 发帖数: 1608 | 11 小肥羊,多少是top呀
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : citation少你是不是没强调top percentage?我inde的也不多,不过加上了中文的凑数 : ,不知道会不会也被REF.. : : first : importance,
|
a***r 发帖数: 146 | 12 谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思? |
r******y 发帖数: 21907 | 13 我也不是专家,5%以上都可以吧,当然1%最好 1-5页可以了
【在 c********u 的大作中提到】 : 小肥羊,多少是top呀
|
a***r 发帖数: 146 | 14 谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思? |
c********u 发帖数: 1608 | 15 谢谢,那怎么查这个citation percentile?就是在web of science上差topic然后rank
citation吗?
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : 我也不是专家,5%以上都可以吧,当然1%最好 1-5页可以了
|
a***r 发帖数: 146 | 16 谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思? |
C*******d 发帖数: 3345 | 17 是pp的么?
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】 : 我的Case 的背景是这样的: : Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first : author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to : google scholar. : 我收到如下的RFE: : Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or : business_related contributions of major significance in the field: : Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the : petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance, : they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
|
r******y 发帖数: 21907 | 18 大家就是跟同年发表的同topic的比 去WofS查就可以,你的文章靠前文章数量多自然%
就小了。
【在 c********u 的大作中提到】 : 谢谢,那怎么查这个citation percentile?就是在web of science上差topic然后rank : citation吗?
|
c********u 发帖数: 1608 | 19 悲剧了,10%都没有。
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : 大家就是跟同年发表的同topic的比 去WofS查就可以,你的文章靠前文章数量多自然% : 就小了。
|
a***r 发帖数: 146 | |
|
|
r******y 发帖数: 21907 | 21 狠劲儿搜,我最后蒸出来了3%。。。
【在 c********u 的大作中提到】 : 悲剧了,10%都没有。
|
L*****p 发帖数: 272 | 22 大大祝福你两星期之内批准!!!!!
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】 : 挨,现在我只想攒人品阿,如果再过两星期还没批,我就准备义务帮大家改RL, 改到批为 : 止,呵呵
|
c********u 发帖数: 1608 | 23 怎么搜,不断的改topic?
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : 狠劲儿搜,我最后蒸出来了3%。。。
|
r******y 发帖数: 21907 | 24 nod~~~~
【在 c********u 的大作中提到】 : 怎么搜,不断的改topic?
|
P*******F 发帖数: 825 | 25 DIY? Pay more attention to details, especially you have limited articles and
citations!
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】 : 我的Case 的背景是这样的: : Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first : author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to : google scholar. : 我收到如下的RFE: : Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or : business_related contributions of major significance in the field: : Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the : petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance, : they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
|
b*******H 发帖数: 830 | 26 俺们的在WOK上查到的比SCHOOLAR上查到的少了很多,直接被挤出了3%。郁闷
【在 r******y 的大作中提到】 : 大家就是跟同年发表的同topic的比 去WofS查就可以,你的文章靠前文章数量多自然% : 就小了。
|
f*********t 发帖数: 166 | 27 问下大蜜,能给个链接到你说的genegun的RL文章吗?我没查到。。
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】 : 这些意思就是说你的RL 写得很糟糕. 这种情况都是因为RL里面使用太多的general : description所致. 可以参看genegun老枪的文章关于如何写RL. Kathy的文章里面也提 : 及了RL一些框架,供参考. : : first : importance,
|
b*******e 发帖数: 24532 | 28 就是说你是自己搞了个citation list,你要提交原始的数据.
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】 : 谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思?
|