由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Immigration版 - 我收到的EB1a的结果,还有希望吗?
相关主题
这是我收到的EB1a的结果,还有希望吗?谢谢这个要回答吗?
eb1a 140 RFE 求助EB1A收到RFE了,contribution不承认
RFE Letter 来了, 请指教.这种RFE还需要再找推荐信吗?
EB1A-追加PP后RFE-请大家帮助请教问题有关EB1申请claim award这一项
不常见的 EB1B RFE 求助~~~NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0002
到底 Best Paper Award 能不能算contribution?eb1a pp RFE了 0362 求建议
EB1A NOID NSC PP DIYEB1A pp被RFE,求建议
EB1A 140 PP RFE 求助NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0242。弱case,求帮助! (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: evidence话题: your话题: field话题: major话题: awards
进入Immigration版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
x**l
发帖数: 2337
1
不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor, because they are
generally given to students or career professionals in the field. In
addition these teaching awards were limited to the university you worked at
and is not considered national or international awards. If the petitioner
believes the prizes or awards are nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field, the petitioner may submit:…
Documentation of membership in associations in the field for which
classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their
members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their
disciplines or fields.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not shown that the
basis for granting memberships in the submitted associations was that your
outstanding achievements in the field of endeavor as judged by recognized
national or international experts in the field. It has been established that
outstandingachievements are required to become a member of the above
associations. To assist in determining that your memberships satisfy this
criterion, the petitioner may submit:
. Information to establish that the individuals who review propective
members’ applications are recognized as national or international experts
in their disciplines or fields: and
. The section of the association’s constitution or bylaws which discuss the
qualifications required of the reviews on the review panel of the
association.
Published material about you in professional or major trade publications or
major media, relating to your work in the field for which claasification is
sought. Such evidence shall include the title, date, and author of the
material, and any necessary translation.
This carterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the published material was published in professional or major trade
publications or other major media. Having ones work cited in various
journals does not meet this criterion, since the material is not primarily
about the petitioner’s work but rather a reference to their work. To assist
in determining that the publications qualify as professional or major trade
publications or other major media, the petitioner may submit:
.Submit evidence there are articals that are primarily about the beneficiary
’s work that was discussed in professional or major trade publications or
other major media.
.Documentary evidence including:
. The title, date, and author of the published material;
. The circulation (online and/or in print); and
. The intened audience of the publication.
Notes:
. Additional published material should be dated prior to the date of
submission of this Form I-140
. The published material should be about the beneficiary’s work in the
field, not just about the beneficiary’s employer or other organizations the
beneficiary’s is associated with:
. Marketing materials created for the purpose of seiling the beneficiary’s
products or promoting the beneficiary’s services are not generally
considered to be published material about the beneficiary;
And
. Unevaluated listings in a subject matter index or footnote, or reference
to the beneficiary’s work without evaluation are insufficient.
Evidence of your participation, either individually or on a panel, as a
judge of the work of others in the same or allied field.
You have claimed to have been invited to review manuscripts for the….
You have indicated you have review for various journals; however, there is
no evidence to establish that the beneficiary actually participated in these
reviews. Plese provide evidence that establishes that the beneficiary
actually participated in the judging of the work of others for which they
were invited.
.Submit the emails from all the journals you have claimed to have been
invited to review for in confirming you have actually performed those
manuscript reviews, and not just simply invited.
Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business-
related contributions of major significance in your field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were from individuals who
already knew you, and the letters of support were general in nature, and did
not establish your accomplishments are any greater than your peers. USCIS
does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major significance
within your field. Given your low publication rate, and low citation record
it has not been established your work has made a major significant impact
within your field. Having published your work in various journals, and
writing a book is inherent to the position in which you serve in, and based
on the evidence your work has not made a major significant inpact. To assist
in determing whether of your contributions are original and of major
siginificance, you may submit:
. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field.
. Evidence of your work being implemented by others. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
. Contracts with companies using of your products;
. Licensed technology being used by others;
. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field.
. Any other relevant evidence.
Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in
professional or major trade publications or other major media
This criterion has been met.
Evidence you have performed in a leading or critical role for organizations
or establishments that have a distinguished reputation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
you have performed in a leading or critical role. The position and duties
you have performed are inherent to the position Post-doctoral fellows, and
assistant professor, Post-doctoral fellows and assistant professor across
the country hold positions such as this; therefore it is not enough to claim
this is a leading or critical role by virture of holding the positions.
Performing complex research and instructing students is inherent to all post
-doctoral fellows, and assistant professors, and is not considered a leading
or critical role. To assist in determining that you have performed in a
leading or critical role for you may submit:ocumentary evidence to
demonstrate how your role was/is leading or critical for the origanizations
or establishments.
. It is not the title of your role. But rather your performance in the role
that determines whether the role id leading or critical. As such, include
details regarding ehy your performance in the role was leading or critical.
. Documentary evidence to establish that you have been a leader or has
somehow contributed in a way that is of significant importance to the
outcome of the organizations or establishments activities.
. Documentary evidence to demonstrate how your performance is or was leading
or critical compared to others employed in similar pursuits within the
field endeavor.
Details beyond generalities are required, such as the specific tasks or
accomplishments of you as compared to others who participated in the field
of endeavor.
. Any other relevant evidence.
目前10条只满足了一条,如果当时把审稿后人家回复我的邮件附上了,估计会满足2条,
我大致情况是这样的:1)某部委科技进步三等奖参与人,某高校优秀教学奖三次
2)审稿4个杂志7次
3)外文文章5篇,其中一作2篇,中文文章11篇,其中一作10篇,国际会
议文章24篇,其中一作7篇。参编书3本,都不是一作,翻译出版书2本,也不是一作。
4)我是生物医学工程方面的土鳖,我文章的影响因子有一篇一作是5吧,文章引用不多啊
,外文的18次,中文的35次吧.
5)5个推荐信,我老板,我们所长,三个独立推荐人,一个美国的华人,一个英国的,一
个芬兰的。
P*******F
发帖数: 825
2
claimed too many items. DIY?
i****N
发帖数: 1102
3
For EB1a, you likely need more reviews and more citations. Publications and
awards in China are nice to have, but it will be better if you also have
strong publications and awards in USA.

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized

b*******e
发帖数: 24532
4
你的整个package基本上所有的材料都要重新来过。那种teaching award是没有任何意
义的award,不要提交,现在是你挖了个坑,自己都挺难爬出来的。 你的推荐信也肯定
很笼统的东西( general in nature) ,需要重写,重改。你可以先在这里做些research
,然后再决定你是否请律师啊,如何改材料什么的。 你还有87天,别急着递交。耐心,
仔细,沉着,严谨才能成功。

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized

i******t
发帖数: 22541
5
是啊 要写 通俗易懂的details,言之有物
x**l
发帖数: 2337
6
推荐信重写根本来不及啊,当时搞那几封推荐信从发给人家到人家给我费了3个月时间啊
.我现在只有70天的时间了.我其实找人帮我搞的啊.NIW和EB1同时搞的.NIW的140顺利的
过关了,EB1给卡在这里了.
c***r
发帖数: 4631
7
深呼吸,深呼吸。看你都语无伦次了。
大伙好多人都是从你这状态过来的。这就是黎明前的黑暗,挺挺就过来了。黎明前的黑
暗你从前经历过么?现在就是那种状态。
努力找几封推荐信,实际上并不是很难。

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 推荐信重写根本来不及啊,当时搞那几封推荐信从发给人家到人家给我费了3个月时间啊
: .我现在只有70天的时间了.我其实找人帮我搞的啊.NIW和EB1同时搞的.NIW的140顺利的
: 过关了,EB1给卡在这里了.

j**l
发帖数: 2911
8
我觉得lz diy 的时候并没有在版上好好考古。
一般大家都知道,10项里面只要claim 三项就好了,而不是每一项都提。
不强的都不提。
m******z
发帖数: 608
9
lz的review和citation这两个硬指标都不够。1a的话review怎么也得30+,citation
100+,否则就是运气了。
x**l
发帖数: 2337
10
我是找律师帮我办的啊.我是找律师帮我办的啊 老板今天决定把我的title由postdoc改
成research scientist. 估计没什么用了吧?
相关主题
到底 Best Paper Award 能不能算contribution?这个要回答吗?
EB1A NOID NSC PP DIYEB1A收到RFE了,contribution不承认
EB1A 140 PP RFE 求助这种RFE还需要再找推荐信吗?
进入Immigration版参与讨论
h*******s
发帖数: 560
11
1A, review 30+太夸张了,不过10+还是要的,而且怎么也得有2,3个以上IF还行的
journal。编辑的证明信肯定是要有的。
citation同意,只要跟生物沾边,个人认为100真的是底线了,除非其他方面特别强,
比如有牛奖或牛媒体报道。

【在 m******z 的大作中提到】
: lz的review和citation这两个硬指标都不够。1a的话review怎么也得30+,citation
: 100+,否则就是运气了。

j**l
发帖数: 2911
12
那你的律师真心不合格。
改title 了,问问老板是不是sponsor eb1b 啊。

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 我是找律师帮我办的啊.我是找律师帮我办的啊 老板今天决定把我的title由postdoc改
: 成research scientist. 估计没什么用了吧?

s****9
发帖数: 932
13
I have to say that you need to reorganize your materials and reapply.
Claimed too much weak pionts that cannot stand for extraordinary ability.

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized

h*****z
发帖数: 51
14
Bless!
j******n
发帖数: 941
15
如果是找律师做的case 那么强烈建议换律师 太不负责了
1 (共1页)
进入Immigration版参与讨论
相关主题
NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0242。弱case,求帮助! (转载)不常见的 EB1B RFE 求助~~~
NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0002 (2017-01-12)到底 Best Paper Award 能不能算contribution?
eb1a 140 pp noid asking for helpEB1A NOID NSC PP DIY
EB1B REF help! Thanks!EB1A 140 PP RFE 求助
这是我收到的EB1a的结果,还有希望吗?谢谢这个要回答吗?
eb1a 140 RFE 求助EB1A收到RFE了,contribution不承认
RFE Letter 来了, 请指教.这种RFE还需要再找推荐信吗?
EB1A-追加PP后RFE-请大家帮助请教问题有关EB1申请claim award这一项
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: evidence话题: your话题: field话题: major话题: awards