b******u
发帖数: 1586 | | K*N
发帖数: 7494 | 2 觉得这个篇幅的长短是其次，重要的是内容。大家都说PL要控制在20页以下。我知道有
洋洋洒洒00-50页的，也批了。bless | s********n
发帖数: 2071 | 3 Agree with KFN. The page numbers d not matter to the RFE,the content is
critical for sure. | L*******e
发帖数: 2540 | | A******n
发帖数: 2976 | 5 big bless!
【在 b******u 的大作中提到】
: 篇幅不会太长吧？
| k*******g
发帖数: 629 | | y******5
发帖数: 858 | | f*******A
发帖数: 322 | | f*********s
发帖数: 838 | | b******u
发帖数: 1586 | | | | c**********o
发帖数: 1941 | | k*****o
发帖数: 983 | | b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 13 better to collect more objective evidence rather than writing in RFE letter.
Objective evidence can talk by itself without RFE response letter sometimes.
In my RFE, only one and a half pages in total, in every merit that had been
challenged, I wrote sth like,
pursuant to the previous request and comments, the following evidence have
been submitted:
1) The verification letter from Prof. Niubee 1. see index 1.
2) The commercialized evidence, purchasing orders, patents licensing
agreements. see index 2.
etc.
【在 b******u 的大作中提到】
: 篇幅不会太长吧？
| e*****g
发帖数: 348 | 14 Bless！
【在 b******u 的大作中提到】
: 篇幅不会太长吧？
| b******u
发帖数: 1586 | 15 恩，有道理
其实我主要问题就是，觉得自己之前的PL写的不咋的，现在相当于重新写了一遍。我之
前的pl中列了表，但感觉io压根就没认真看，我在想，他们是不是看不懂，所以就尽量
对每个证据啥的多了相应解释
letter.
sometimes.
been
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: better to collect more objective evidence rather than writing in RFE letter.
: Objective evidence can talk by itself without RFE response letter sometimes.
: In my RFE, only one and a half pages in total, in every merit that had been
: challenged, I wrote sth like,
: pursuant to the previous request and comments, the following evidence have
: been submitted:
: 1) The verification letter from Prof. Niubee 1. see index 1.
: 2) The commercialized evidence, purchasing orders, patents licensing
: agreements. see index 2.
: etc.
|
|
