i****w
发帖数: 329 | 1 The original post:
Title: EB1a TSC received RFE letter IO#:XM206, anyone adjudicated by the
same IO?
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32204721.html
EB1A I-140, non-pp, filed on 6/23/2011, RFE sent on 1/4/2012;
very discouraging RFE request: RFE on all five claims made in PL: memership,
authorship, review (judge of the work of others), leading/critical role,
original contributions of major significance
I wonder who has experience with the same IO? thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
More background information on my case:
thanks for all the advice and blessings.
My case was self-petitioned, not through an attorney.But my background is
different than most of the people over here. I work in business sector, and
not on a research role, and almost all of my work are proprietary assets to
the company, therefore it is challenging to establish my PERSONAL
contribution to my field of expertise.
For example, my company/department receives external review requests from
the government agencies or peer companies, and the review responses are
often sent back in the name of company even though I am the one who does the
review or participate in a panel review. In additional, many other times, I
review work of my peers across lines of business within the company and
there are no invitation letter type of documents.
In my petition, i submitted reviewed documents and supp porting letters to
state that i participated in the review. The RFE letter asks:
"Please provide documentary evidence that establishes that the beneficiary
was invited and actually participated in the judging of the work of others
for which she was invited"
Anyone has similar background?
Thanks! |
|
