a********y
发帖数: 655 | 1 今年6月份的140,刚刚收到RFE的信,不知道有没有兄弟姐妹有类似的情况?
其中一条没有过:
There is insufficient evidence that there is a whole department in the
private employer which conducts research activities per se and has achieved
documented accomplishments in an academic field.
公司总共300人,有12个人左右在R&D department, 一半多PhD,一些research
technician. Officer列了几个理由说不行,
1) 做R&D的人太少,12个在300人比例太少.
2) 每年投入只有$2 millions不到,占公司的$140 millions revenue比例太小.(公司虽
然revenue大,可是profit不高,不知道能否通过这点来说明).
3) 做的不是scientific research,而是 research technology sold to other
companies.
140的时候把公司每年发的文章和专利都列出来,都有很多,近5年几十篇文章几十个专利
,可是说不是scientific research?
大家有没有什么好的建议呀? | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 2 This is on your company's researcher info, and it should be an easier RFE.
Only 3 researchers are required, so 12 is enough. You don't have to consider
the ratio. Just try to prove that these 12 are doing tasks on research.
achieved
【在 a********y 的大作中提到】
: 今年6月份的140,刚刚收到RFE的信,不知道有没有兄弟姐妹有类似的情况?
: 其中一条没有过:
: There is insufficient evidence that there is a whole department in the
: private employer which conducts research activities per se and has achieved
: documented accomplishments in an academic field.
: 公司总共300人,有12个人左右在R&D department, 一半多PhD,一些research
: technician. Officer列了几个理由说不行,
: 1) 做R&D的人太少,12个在300人比例太少.
: 2) 每年投入只有$2 millions不到,占公司的$140 millions revenue比例太小.(公司虽
: 然revenue大,可是profit不高,不知道能否通过这点来说明).
| a********y
发帖数: 655 | 3 对呀,只是require 3个而已,可是RFE上硬是说比例太少.
consider
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: This is on your company's researcher info, and it should be an easier RFE.
: Only 3 researchers are required, so 12 is enough. You don't have to consider
: the ratio. Just try to prove that these 12 are doing tasks on research.
:
: achieved
| T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 4 RFE mentions that they want to see that "there is a whole department", but
not on the ratio ah. Can you prove that these 12 are in the R&D department
or something?
【在 a********y 的大作中提到】
: 对呀,只是require 3个而已,可是RFE上硬是说比例太少.
:
: consider
|
|
