i******s
发帖数: 925 | 1 仔细看了一下RFE信，“evidence must show that the beneficiary was eligible
for the requested benefit when the Form 140 petition was filed”
新发的文章，新的citation和review都不能用吗？ |
h**********l
发帖数: 6342 | 2 引用因该可以
那些发了的paper肯定在你交140以前，不过是现在才刚刚能搜到
【在 i******s 的大作中提到】
: 仔细看了一下RFE信，“evidence must show that the beneficiary was eligible
: for the requested benefit when the Form 140 petition was filed”
: 新发的文章，新的citation和review都不能用吗？
|
J****9
发帖数: 442 | 3 Even they have that regulation as you pasted.
However, you need to mention the new evidence in your response, for sure.
They are good to show that you are continuing make contributions to the
field (your new papers) and you are continuing benefit other researchers
across the world (your new citations). |
i******s
发帖数: 925 | 4 谢谢。那我当时递交的时候，一篇文章是在review， 现在接受了，马上
就要 in press了，这种情况可以吗？
【在 h**********l 的大作中提到】
: 引用因该可以
: 那些发了的paper肯定在你交140以前，不过是现在才刚刚能搜到
|
g*******3
发帖数: 2520 | |
i******s
发帖数: 925 | 6 谢谢您的指点。我觉得这是正解。我用一封推荐信来证明这个可以吗？但貌似没有要求
补sustained材料。
【在 J****9 的大作中提到】
: Even they have that regulation as you pasted.
: However, you need to mention the new evidence in your response, for sure.
: They are good to show that you are continuing make contributions to the
: field (your new papers) and you are continuing benefit other researchers
: across the world (your new citations).
|
i******s
发帖数: 925 | 7 谢谢！害怕画蛇添足
【在 g*******3 的大作中提到】
: show 出来总比不 show出来好。
|
