c***a
发帖数: 56 | 1 比如一片报道评论了我的一片文章，我知道用他来claim media report (EB1A) 有些勉
强。
就这个证据如何支持 contribution 和 authorship, 以下是我的几个plan，请大家给
写意见：
Plan A:
1. Contributions
a. xxx
b. I have contribution, evidenced by some media report about my paper "
ABC".
(Followed by detailed story.)
2. Authorship
a. xxx
b. I have published high-quality paper "ABC", since media reported the
paper.
(repeat the stroy with details)
Plan B:
1. Contributions
a. xxx
b. I have contribution, evidenced by some media report about my paper "
ABC".
(Followed by detailed story.)
2. Authorship
a. xxx
b. I have published high-quality paper "ABC", since media reported the
paper.
As dicussed in Sec. 1, this piece of evidence can support "Authorship"
Plan c:
1. Contributions
a. xxx
b. I have contribution, evidenced by some media report about my paper "
ABC".
This is a great accomplishment. The details will be discussed in
detail in
following section.
2. Authorship
a. xxx
b. I have published high-quality paper "ABC", since media reported the
paper.
(Followed by detailed story.) | H*7
发帖数: 4894 | 2 你这3个计划有区别么。
主要放在contribution 里吧。authorship 本来就不需要怎么证明，发表了就是发表了
。 | f****D
发帖数: 4745 | 3 一样的吧
不过重复几次也没坏处吧
万一VO露看了哪次呢，哈哈 | c***a
发帖数: 56 | 4 不是吧，处处都要显示top 吧。方在authorship里要证明 publications 的 top 呀！
我的思路不对吗？
【在 H*7 的大作中提到】
: 你这3个计划有区别么。
: 主要放在contribution 里吧。authorship 本来就不需要怎么证明，发表了就是发表了
: 。
| c***a
发帖数: 56 | 5 我也是害怕VO看楼了，或者没看到证据在两个claim的意义。但是，简单的repeat 显的
重复， 所以我想有轻有重。。。
【在 f****D 的大作中提到】
: 一样的吧
: 不过重复几次也没坏处吧
: 万一VO露看了哪次呢，哈哈
|
|
