f*******b
发帖数: 186 | 1 自己比较弱，没看懂那个表格
比如2007年，Harvard:Journal publication per faculty, 19.84;Citations per
faculty: 305.92.
我的理解是：平均每个教授2007年发了19.84篇文章，他的所有发表过的文章在2007年
被应用了305次。
不知道这样的理解是否正确？如果正确，我感觉板上99.9%的人都无法跟他们比较啊。
请大家指教。 | J********L
发帖数: 2635 | | f*******b
发帖数: 186 | 3 谢谢回复
但是我确实不太相信top 10教授的累加文章平均文章才20－40篇，而总引用才300多次。
请曾经用过chronicle的xdjm上来指教一下。
【在 J********L 的大作中提到】
: 感觉应该是累加的值，而不是一年的
| Y*Z
发帖数: 1301 | 4 Please see the instruction, positioned under the form, 2007 information as
follows:
When books are included, their weight is five times that of journal articles
for the Humanities and three times that of a journal article in other broad
fields. Journal articles are counted for the years 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Citation counts cover a four year span so refer to citations to articles
published for the years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. The index uses Scopus, an
abstract-and-citation database that covers more than 15,000 peer-reviewed
journals. | J********L
发帖数: 2635 | 5 这个clear，不是1年，也不是累加，而是前3 or 4年累加
articles
broad
an
【在 Y*Z 的大作中提到】
: Please see the instruction, positioned under the form, 2007 information as
: follows:
: When books are included, their weight is five times that of journal articles
: for the Humanities and three times that of a journal article in other broad
: fields. Journal articles are counted for the years 2004, 2005, and 2006.
: Citation counts cover a four year span so refer to citations to articles
: published for the years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. The index uses Scopus, an
: abstract-and-citation database that covers more than 15,000 peer-reviewed
: journals.
|
|
