J******m
发帖数: 97 | 1 Eb1a, 7月份递过一次材料，PP, RFE后被据，原因是满足3条，但是我不是行业内TOP
BLA BLA，这次花了点时间改PETITION LETTER，一个月过去了，想重递材料试运气, 还
想PP，有人试过没？不强的case是不是就不要PP了？不是钱多，而且两人都急着要绿卡
找工作，夫妻两地，太辛苦了，绿卡批了才有盼头呀! | w******g
发帖数: 82 | 2 看你自己怎么想啦。我第一次PP, RFE之后被拒。隔了几个月之后重新递交，
先是走regular的，待收到receipt之后寄去PP申请，支票被cash之后第四天
被直接approve.整个过程下来连带邮寄时间大概两个礼拜。每个人的情况
不尽相同，希望我的case对你有所帮助。
【在 J******m 的大作中提到】
: Eb1a, 7月份递过一次材料，PP, RFE后被据，原因是满足3条，但是我不是行业内TOP
: BLA BLA，这次花了点时间改PETITION LETTER，一个月过去了，想重递材料试运气, 还
: 想PP，有人试过没？不强的case是不是就不要PP了？不是钱多，而且两人都急着要绿卡
: 找工作，夫妻两地，太辛苦了，绿卡批了才有盼头呀!
| s****r
发帖数: 293 | 3 Blessing
【在 J******m 的大作中提到】
: Eb1a, 7月份递过一次材料，PP, RFE后被据，原因是满足3条，但是我不是行业内TOP
: BLA BLA，这次花了点时间改PETITION LETTER，一个月过去了，想重递材料试运气, 还
: 想PP，有人试过没？不强的case是不是就不要PP了？不是钱多，而且两人都急着要绿卡
: 找工作，夫妻两地，太辛苦了，绿卡批了才有盼头呀!
| c*******r
发帖数: 164 | 4 这跟直接PP也有区别啊。。。
【在 w******g 的大作中提到】
: 看你自己怎么想啦。我第一次PP, RFE之后被拒。隔了几个月之后重新递交，
: 先是走regular的，待收到receipt之后寄去PP申请，支票被cash之后第四天
: 被直接approve.整个过程下来连带邮寄时间大概两个礼拜。每个人的情况
: 不尽相同，希望我的case对你有所帮助。
| W*******R
发帖数: 1224 | 5 不pp要等很久，我的5个月了还没消息。但是pp确实会带来NOID或者REF，这是个
balance，自己考虑好。 | v*******0
发帖数: 59 | 6 我觉得PP和RFE，NOID没有关系
就是早点审你的材料而已
【在 W*******R 的大作中提到】
: 不pp要等很久，我的5个月了还没消息。但是pp确实会带来NOID或者REF，这是个
: balance，自己考虑好。
| W*******R
发帖数: 1224 | 7 这已经是月经贴了，自己考考古就知道了，多说无益。
【在 v*******0 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得PP和RFE，NOID没有关系
: 就是早点审你的材料而已
| s*****s
发帖数: 430 | 8 我去年10月第一次PP,RFE之后被拒。今年6月，DIY+PP+E-file to TSC，10天之后直接
批准。当
然，从第一次被拒到第二次PP，半年之内发生了一些显著的变化，比如拿到了IEEE的
senior，多了十
几篇媒体报道支持contribution。
【在 J******m 的大作中提到】
: Eb1a, 7月份递过一次材料，PP, RFE后被据，原因是满足3条，但是我不是行业内TOP
: BLA BLA，这次花了点时间改PETITION LETTER，一个月过去了，想重递材料试运气, 还
: 想PP，有人试过没？不强的case是不是就不要PP了？不是钱多，而且两人都急着要绿卡
: 找工作，夫妻两地，太辛苦了，绿卡批了才有盼头呀!
| v*******0
发帖数: 59 | 9 我之前也发过一篇分析文章
这篇文章也写得不错，总的来说，PP和和non PP在RFE和NOID上基本无差别，对outcome
应该没有影响，我觉得你应该PP，多花1000块，早点知道，呵呵
Tejas Shah, Attorney at Law (t***[email protected])
On June 29, 2009, the USCIS resumed the Premium Processing Service for the
EB-1(A) (Alien of Extraordinary Ability), EB-1(B) (Outstanding Researcher),
EB-2 (except NIW), and EB-3 categories. For payment of an extra $1000 filing
fee and after submitting the I-907 form, the applicant is guaranteed a
decision (Approval, Denial, Request for Evidence (RFE), or Notice of Intent
to Deny (NID)) within fifteen (15) days of submission, and another response
within this time period if a RFE or NID response is submitted. Since USCIS
resumed premium processing, we have filed hundreds of cases in these
categories using both the regular process and premium processing. One
question we commonly encounter from applicants, especially in the EB-1A and
EB-1B categories, is whether they should select premium processing or not.
This brief overview is intended to describe our experience and to help you
make the right decision. Nothing herein is intended to provide legal advice
and this does not substitute for the counsel of an actual attorney.
The obvious advantage of Premium Processing is speed. For applicants who
have impending status issues that necessitate the filing of an I-485, but
would rather have the decision on their I-140 before making the investment
in an I-485 (which can be substantial if multiple family members will be
adjusting status), this is a considerable advantage that provides finality
and clarity regarding the outcome, and will help the applicant plan next
steps.
1. For a client whose status is going to expire in 3-4 months, but is
unsure what option to pursue (file an I-485 concurrently with the EB-1 I-140
, apply for H-1 extension, etc.), premium processing would allow them to
secure a decision well within that timeframe and file an I-485 application
as well. This is clearly a significant benefit.
2. Another commonly encountered situation is a self-sponsoring individual
whose case is competitive for an EB-1A but is far from a guaranteed
approval. While we often advise clients, especially Indian and Chinese
nationals (for whom the EB-2 NIW category is not current), to consider an EB
-1A as well to support immediate adjustment of status, some clients prefer
to take one petition at a time. Moreover, the risk of denial of the EB-1A is
a significant factor to consider. One way to address these concerns is to
file the EB-1A first using premium processing, and if an adverse decision is
rendered by USCIS, to file the NIW immediately afterwards. Using Premium
Processing in place of regular processing in this instance presents several
advantages. First, since the NIW category as EB-2 has a significant backlog
in immigrant visa number for Indians and Chinese nationals and the applicant
benefits from establishing an earlier priority date (defined as the date
that the I-140 is filed – in this case, the date that the NIW I-140 is
filed) by filing NIW, it is better to get a decision sooner rather than
later. Second, in the event that a NIW petition is necessary, the evidence
is fresh and will not require significant modification since the timeframe
is much shorter.
On the other hand, selecting premium processing is an expensive proposition,
and it does carry some drawbacks. First and foremost, a quick decision
means that the weight of evidence submitted in response to a RFE will likely
be the same as the initial petition. For many clients who may have citation
statistics for their publications that continue to increase at a steady
clip, the weight of evidence submitted when responding to a RFE in regular
processing (which would be likely issued a full 3-4 months after submission,
at the minimum) by comparison to premium processing (15 days or less) could
be substantially different. While the USCIS is technically not bound to
consider any evidence after the date the petition is filed, citations are
treated as evidence of the impact of previously-submitted publications and
are therefore generally always considered in the body of evidence. This
important strategic point should be considered in consultation with your
attorney.
Second, there are some indications that examiners do not engage in a
thorough examination of the evidence submitted initially on premium
processing, and instead tend to resort to frustrating “blanket” RFEs that
require generalized evidence of impact. This can be stressful to deal with
because, presumably, the applicant and attorney have fully considered all
sources of evidence in preparing the case the first-time around, and limited
additional evidence would be available in the fifteen days after submission
. However, this issue can be addressed by focusing on the fact that the RFE
is often not about the weight of the evidence, but about the quality of the
evidence. Thus, additional evidence to substantiate the impact of previously
submitted proof of citations or service as a reviewer, in the form of
reference statements from scientists who have cited the applicant’s work or
those who have invited him/her as a reviewer for journals/conferences, can
result in an approval. The applicant must be prepared to do some significant
work during this period in responding to the RFE under the attorney’s
guidance. However, there is no indication that the outcome on Premium
Processing vs. general processing is any different. Thus, while the process
may be different and more stressful in some cases, it will often tend to be
the same outcome.
In closing, Premium Processing is an important tool and an excellent
resource for many applicants in the EB-1 category especially. However, it
may not be the right tool for everybody, and it is essential that you
consult with your attorney and consider his/her advice before deciding
whether or not to select this option. Here at Zhang and Associates, we have
unparalleled experience in filing I-140 cases using premium processing and
we encourage you to consult with one of our attorneys.
【在 W*******R 的大作中提到】
: 这已经是月经贴了，自己考考古就知道了，多说无益。
| D*U
发帖数: 365 | 10 我认为PP和RFE没什么关联
【在 W*******R 的大作中提到】
: 这已经是月经贴了，自己考考古就知道了，多说无益。
| H****e
发帖数: 2050 | |
|
