d*****3
发帖数: 206 | 1 claim了authorship, 但是因为引用很少，发了8篇文章，现在才3个独立引用
被TSC 0001打回来了，原文如下
No claim is made as to the number of occasions colleagues have officially
cited these articles in any of their professionally published articles. A
check this date of the search engine Google Scholar fails to reveal any of
these written pieces has ever been so cited.
The reality is that never having been cited by other professionals in your
field can not be seen as commensurate with someone who can be considered as
an outstanding res |
t******y
发帖数: 526 | 2 你啥时候发的文章啊，8篇生物的文章，不太可能就3篇引用啊？ |
d*****3
发帖数: 206 | 3 第一篇是09年下半年出来的
【在 t******y 的大作中提到】
: 你啥时候发的文章啊，8篇生物的文章，不太可能就3篇引用啊？
|
l*****m
发帖数: 507 | 4 WHY original contribution 也没能通过? |
d*****3
发帖数: 206 | 5 我贴下IO的原话，请大家帮我看看，有没有比较好的反驳的方法？
Yet, these and other compliments of the beneficiary notwithstanding, nothing
in the record firmly and documentarily establishes the beneficiary has made
any truly original contributions to any aspect of ***** that is of such
definitely profound significance and on a level expected from an outstanding
researcher that it greatly altered the thinking and/or approach of a very
sizable swath of similarly employed researcher and personnel. Too, nothing
in the record indi
【在 l*****m 的大作中提到】
: WHY original contribution 也没能通过?
|
K**o
发帖数: 906 | 6 contribution就是你工作对别人及这个领域产生的影响;
io一是觉得你citation少,2是觉得你提供的evidence只有potential future
implications.
所以不满足这一条; 建议挖掘出你work已经产生的影响.
contribution对大多数来说应该是必须过的;我claim时把这条放在第一个,因为没
citation, 花了5页论述如何满足这条..找出别人对你work的评价等,任何positive的东
东都往上凑,但不是future的.
nothing
made
outstanding
results
【在 d*****3 的大作中提到】
: 我贴下IO的原话，请大家帮我看看，有没有比较好的反驳的方法？
: Yet, these and other compliments of the beneficiary notwithstanding, nothing
: in the record firmly and documentarily establishes the beneficiary has made
: any truly original contributions to any aspect of ***** that is of such
: definitely profound significance and on a level expected from an outstanding
: researcher that it greatly altered the thinking and/or approach of a very
: sizable swath of similarly employed researcher and personnel. Too, nothing
: in the record indi
|
b*****o
发帖数: 3499 | 7 3个独立引用足够多了，
你可以说，我老的工作绝对top level，无人可比
虽然也有不少傻蛋也做我这方面的，
但是，so far, 除了我，没一个做出来的
丫们怎么可能cite我老的东西 |
c*******g
发帖数: 1048 | 8 certainly not a very constructive advice
【在 b*****o 的大作中提到】
: 3个独立引用足够多了，
: 你可以说，我老的工作绝对top level，无人可比
: 虽然也有不少傻蛋也做我这方面的，
: 但是，so far, 除了我，没一个做出来的
: 丫们怎么可能cite我老的东西
|
b*****o
发帖数: 3499 | 9 o
楼主只有改投eb3了
【在 c*******g 的大作中提到】
: certainly not a very constructive advice
|
c**a
发帖数: 247 | |
|
|
G****4
发帖数: 160 | 11 估计是PP的吧？
不是太强的case尽量不要PP
IO可能都没时间去发掘你case的亮点，看到有明显硬伤就直接做决定了
officially
articles. A
any of
your
considered as
especially true
and
【在 d*****3 的大作中提到】
: claim了authorship, 但是因为引用很少，发了8篇文章，现在才3个独立引用
: 被TSC 0001打回来了，原文如下
: No claim is made as to the number of occasions colleagues have officially
: cited these articles in any of their professionally published articles. A
: check this date of the search engine Google Scholar fails to reveal any of
: these written pieces has ever been so cited.
: The reality is that never having been cited by other professionals in your
: field can not be seen as commensurate with someone who can be considered as
: an outstanding res
|
c*******g
发帖数: 1048 | 12 你的research具体是哪方面的？
看看能不能找到数据说明你的领域整体文章引用就是很少，这样也许还说得通
不过总共3次独立引用确实太少了
1B虽然比1A要求低不少，但毕竟也是outstanding researcher，看着有点玄
祝好运
officially
articles. A
any of
your
considered as
especially true
and
【在 d*****3 的大作中提到】
: claim了authorship, 但是因为引用很少，发了8篇文章，现在才3个独立引用
: 被TSC 0001打回来了，原文如下
: No claim is made as to the number of occasions colleagues have officially
: cited these articles in any of their professionally published articles. A
: check this date of the search engine Google Scholar fails to reveal any of
: these written pieces has ever been so cited.
: The reality is that never having been cited by other professionals in your
: field can not be seen as commensurate with someone who can be considered as
: an outstanding res
|
l******t
发帖数: 2243 | 13 do you have positive comments on your manuscripts from blinded reviewers? |
d*****3
发帖数: 206 | 14 谢谢大家的回复了！现在正在等律师的意见！
【在 l******t 的大作中提到】
: do you have positive comments on your manuscripts from blinded reviewers?
|
h*w
发帖数: 134 | 15 lawyer is a trash . Do not rely on them. I looked at my PL. She claims three
points in a page. Just states the fact nothing else.
I have to rewrite them all. This is a stupid shcool lawyer. |
h*********r
发帖数: 290 | 16 When you submited your papers, the editor gave some comments before
acception. If there are some positive word in these comments, you may use
them as evidences.
as
true
【在 d*****3 的大作中提到】
: claim了authorship, 但是因为引用很少，发了8篇文章，现在才3个独立引用
: 被TSC 0001打回来了，原文如下
: No claim is made as to the number of occasions colleagues have officially
: cited these articles in any of their professionally published articles. A
: check this date of the search engine Google Scholar fails to reveal any of
: these written pieces has ever been so cited.
: The reality is that never having been cited by other professionals in your
: field can not be seen as commensurate with someone who can be considered as
: an outstanding res
|
